Rishton Ka Vyapaar | Karan B Oberoi | #MenToo

Constitution Article 21 : Live & Liberty of A person with dignity , had been snatched way by Law makers , #MiLord of Judiciary from Indian Men. They abused/misused the #Article15 (3) for their vote bank policy and common Men are suffering in #Fakecases.

Time to #SracpArticle-15_3 to restore the Article 21 . #SpeakUpMen as #MenToo are Human.

Pyaar Ka Punchnama 2 : Review of Love-Relationship of 21st Century

Don't get fooled by Feminist and Alpha Men groups . They will intentionally give low rating, but can't hide the harsh reality under carpet any more.

Cast: Kartik Aaryan, Nushrat Bharucha, Sunny Singh,Sonalli Sehgall,Ishita Raj,Omkar Kapoor

Director: Luv Ranjan

Rating: 4.5/5

Luv Ranjan’s directorial debut--Pyar Ka Punchnama was not a surprise hit of 2011, the film went on to develop the harsh reality of #FeministWorld how the worth of a man in today . The film was appreciated by many as it shows courage to picture out in their loved movie, how man used to suffer in a relationship.

The sequel to PKP is based on similar premise with different treatment with the story, the film once again highlights the plight of  man in a so called #MansWorld where perceived that only women are claimed to be victims in gender inequality war.

The film traces the life of three friends – Gogo (Karthik Aryan), Siddharth (Sunny Singh) and Thakur (Omkar Kapoor), who get into a relationship as soon as they meet their girls. After their initial fling, the trio is seen getting deep into a mess rather than a relationship.

Gogo's love interest Chiku (Nusrat Bharucha) never fails to dig about his boyfriend’s past but finds it okay to share bed with her male best friend, thanks to ideology of  #MyChoice #MyBody should be acceptable only for women.

While Siddharth gets fed up of performing household chores of his girlfriend to impress her parents, Thakur struggles with an utterly overbearing and pretentious girlfriend Kusum (Ishita Sharma) who has her eyes set on his bank accounts.

These are the story of almost every Boy friend’s of today’s #FeministWorld. Women had liberated themselves from their traditional roles and men had welcome the same with open heart, but they had never allowed men themselves to liberated from their traditional role of provider and protector for family and society. 

Witness many Laws and Sc judgments , where it says Jobless can’t be a ground to deny maintenance to your wife or Girlfriend , but the same Job loss can be ground for your well educated, healthy wives or girlfriends to claim maintenance from Husband or Boyfriend.

PKP-2 has some genuine rib-tickling moments with a blend of dark humor and a balanced performance from most of the cast.

The dialogues by Rahul Mody, Tarun Jain and Luv Ranjan takes a swipe at the conventional notion of love and commitment in a fast changing world where love has become a self interest in disguise. It’s like girls or women had already reached to 22^nd century when it comes to choose their partner but men still sleeping in 16^th century love story.

Maximum boy or men victim of strong believe that without a wife or Girlfriend his life is totally useless. The magic key of success or failure in life caged in their wife or Girlfriends hand only.   

PKP-2 is basically an 21^st century harsh reality of  love-relationship , which many boys or men are un-aware  or don’t know , except  sharing jokes on wives or girlfriends in closed WhattsApp group.

Like its prequel, PKP-2 once again offers a bursting soliloquy by a brilliant Karthik Aryan on impossibility of understanding a woman. Only this time Karthik Aryan has replaced Kartikeya Tiwari.

PKP-2 a movie which has courage to show the truth and harsh reality of 21^st century and hope many men will come in reality that today Love-relationship or marriage for women no more  like 16^th century love story.

PKP-2 could be an eyesore for the radical feminist brigade as the film has unabashedly exposes the harsh reality of #FeminsitWorld and is totally unapologetic, unlike many other film try to justify the wrong doing of Women. Fact is such relationship does not have a happy ending and can’t be, so why to be apologetic?

Keeping in mind it’s a low budget film ( 9crs) and maximum movie reviewer will take side of feminist world , you will find low rating , but I will give 4.5 out of 5 instead of 5 , as the film failed to give the true messages at end about future of such relationship .

One short fall of the film is it had failed to bring another important harsh reality, if such love-relationship failed it’s the men have to go to jail , that's  #UnFairlaw of India. There should have been at least one of them termed as rapist and send to Life imprisonments.

In any disturb love-relationship, if the boys break up, he had been termed as Rapist and if Girls break up, still the Boy termed as Stalker or Mental or Pervert .

If such love-relationship failed it’s the men have to go to jail. 

It’s no more a #MensWorld, it’s #FeministWorld who force men or Boys to behave like a just Free ATM machine or became a Robot without heart and humanity.

The early you accept truth , is better for yourself .

 

#HugYourDad & take Vow to Stop Fatherless Child society in India on #FathersDay.

Vicks VapoRub #HugYourDad - YouTube

▶ 1:19

“This father’s day, I am expressing my love towards my dad by participating in the #HugYourDad activity at BlogAdda in association with Vicks.”

 

Only a Father can put his life at risk knowingly or unknowingly for his Child. Many of you would have heard this popular story: 

Once a fatherand his 8 years old daughter was to cross a river. There was only one small damaged bamboo bridge to cross the river. The chances of bridge breaking down were very high if one was to walk through the bridge.

The father asked his daughter to hold his hand tightly, so that she would not fall down.

But the daughter said, “NO”, you hold my hand instead of me holding your hand.

The father was surprised and asked his daughter the reason?

The daughter replied, “I may leave your hand by mistake, but I know you will never leave my hand in any condition”.

That is the trust and confidence a Father gives to his Child.

Recently I witnessed an Advertisement of Gillette Role Model camping, where a 9 year old boy named Rudra, fights with his friend Kush, as Kush was hitting a sixer on every ball Rudra bowled to him. Rudra started using abusive words and they both end up fighting.

When his father questions him, from where he had learned such abusive words, he innocently replied “On TV bowlers use such words for Batsmen”.  

His father then tells him to go and apologise to his friend and congratulate his friends for his success.  

The boy asks his father “Why to congratulate?”

The father asks back, “Who hit the Six?”

The boy replies, “Kush”.

Father asks again “So, should Kush not be congratulated?”

Rudra understands what his father was trying to teach him. He rushes to Kush and apologises and congratulates him. His father later approaches Rudra and tells him that he will teach Rudra new bowling technique, so that he can bowl Kush out in the first ball the next time.

Father is the first teacher any child witnesses from their childhood. 

These all are happy stories that we all remember. But there are hidden truths in Indian society and courts of LAW, where more than 95% fathers are denied the custody of a child although comparatively they are more capable of taking care of their child’s welfare. Their paternal emotions for their own children get smashed day after day in the courtrooms, but Judges continue to use fathers as FREE ATM machines.

With time more and more anti-men, anti-father laws like 498A, DV, CRPC125, adultery laws etc, family harmony is being destroyed and the couple are fighting in court across 6 to 8 cases against each other. Such fathers and husband are treated as guilty till proven innocent.

The verbal statements of a wife are considered as gospel truth, irrespective of the audio/video evidence husbands and fathers provide, irrespective of their heart wrenching distress that is evident to all present in the courtrooms. Everyone, but the judges can see that he is not at fault, and label him a criminal, a worthless, incapable father unless higher courts state otherwise.

On average it takes between 5 to 7 years to prove a man his innocence. Historically and statistically, in more than 90% cases courts eventually find Husbands and fathers not at fault. However by this time he has lost 5 to 7 years of his golden years that he would have lived and shared with his loved child. No court, no society, no sympathy, nobody, not even Almighty God can give back those precious years to a husband, a father. While a father lives in pain during these years, a child misses out on all the love, affection, care, guidance that the child would have received from his father.

The most unbearable pain such fathers get is the pain of being deprived to meet and share moments with their own child or children. Many a times, when such pain crosses a certain threshold, fathers see no choice but to end their lives to stop living with such unbearable pain. In SIF, we have witnessed numerous cases where men have ended their lives silently, but at the same time being apologetic to their children for not having suffered ongoing pain. On various video sharing websites like Youtube, one can find many videos like that of Syed Makhdoom who have left final messages for their children and the world.

As a SIF moderator, in last 10 years, I have seen more than 7000+ cases, where a husband has been treated just like a free ATM machine. To get a basic visiting right for his child, court keeps giving dates after date. After many years of a long painful fight against the rotten, corrupt system, when he does eventually get a legal right, the wife does not obey the court order and poisons the child’s mind against his own father, labelling him as the worst person in the world; as ifDawood Ibrahim would be a better person than his own father.  

Anish Aggarwal, a 38 years old bright Software engineer, has been paying Rs 6000 per month for the past 2 years as maintenance to his child; however he continues to wait to meet his child. He continues to endure this pain in hope. Hope that one day he will be able to meet his child, give him a hug and shower his blessings upon the child. His child and he continue to miss those precious moments that they both deserve and need as humans.

Mr. ShymalVikram, 39 years old, HR manager in a MNC, managed to see his child in the 8^th year after paying Rs 8000 per month for 7 years. He was over the moon when he met his child. However who will return those precious 7 years of love and affection that he wanted to give and his child had right to receive? 

Mr. KunalMitra, had child visiting order in hand for 3 year, but failed to meet his child. When he reached in front of his wife’s home to meet his child, she filed more cases like Domestic violence to threaten him. Why has society given such ludicrous powers to wives that they continue to misuse and destroy a father and his love for his child?

Mr. Ashish Sarkar, 38 years old works in a media house. For the last 2 years he has been fighting in a court to find out if his child is a son or a daughter, let alone see the child. His wife on the other hand seeks maintenance for the child! Where is humanity heading, where is our Indian society moving towards with so much greed and selfishness?  

Mr. Ashish Sarkar, had a judgment, where the judge clearly mentioned in maintenance cases order, that it is totally unfair on part of wife to hide the child’s sex. Unfortunately due to rampant gender bias and blindness towards men and fathers, he cant do anything against such injustice even in a court. Why do we have a judicial system that is so diseased and disabled? 

Similar to such real life situations, such injustice to Indian fathers is rampant. India is heading speedily towards a fatherless society.  

In a recent letter, a Delhi based NGO Save Family Foundation questioned WCD (Women and child Ministry) on Father’s Day - Can a Child get Divorced?( Link )

They also cited statistics on how a Fatherless society is dangerous:

As we know fathers play a vital role in the development of a child. In United States of America, reported statistics inform us that Children from fatherless homes are:

1. 5 times more likely to commit suicide

2. 32 times more likely to run away from home.

3. 20 times more likely to have behavioural disorders

4. 9 times more likely to drop out of high school.

5. 10 times more likely to abuse chemical substances (become drug addicts)

In India, if you were to go through the crime data on Children and Adolescents, you will notice that more than 70 percent are fatherless children while more than 90 percent of call girls under prostitution net, confirm that they don’t have a father.

But will our LAW makers, WCD and Court Judges ever understand this and should they continue to use fathers as Free ATM machine only? If only money were able to provide a good welfare fora child, then all children from rich homes would have good moral characters and would never have any criminal records.

A child needs a teacher, a trusting relationship, a guiding friend, a loving father and a figure who has a God-like nature for blessings. Only a father can provide these as a single entity on this planet. These cannot be bought by money and no other human can give these to a child the way a Father does.

Now a days we witness Supreme Court, LAW makers and radical feminist groups advocating mediation/counselling from women’s cells all across the country. However these women cells have become cells of legal extortion and blackmailing cells for desperate, distressed fathers.

In my opinion as an advocate for Family harmony and child benefit, I suggest that children should have access to both parents irrespective of whether couple are able to reunite or separate amicably. That should be a standard process if we are to keep the child’s welfare at the forefront. Clearly a child cannot express such common-sense desire in women’s cell or Police stations or the NGO heads who are too often blinded in the name of women empowerment.

Please don’t kill the emotion of a Father for his child, an emotion that cannot be created or duplicated by force, law or threats. Biased practices in the courtrooms and society also kill the emotions of a child that are created by nature. Such emotional bonds are needed for a normal development of a child physically, emotionally, morally, spiritually and socially.

Very sadly, many lawyers, judges and others with blinded vision feel proud when a wife gets complete child custody or receives a big fat amount of money in the name of child care. Commonly we hear “A child has been united by his mother”. Nobody says “A child has been separated from his Father”. Such children become and remain fatherless forever.

As responsible adults, we must encourage children to meet separated Father’s home every weekend and whenever there is an opportunity, instead of supervised visitations or meetings limited to family court premises or within a park etc.

We must seek Law makers and Politicians to Grant immediate and equal (child) access to both parents, to legislate laws and make co-parenting mandatory to prevent expanding a fatherless society.

A women hide her first marriage to marry a man, can she File Domestic Violence Act?

Ask any small Child the answer will be "No". Make any opinion pool, a common sense person will say "No"!

But Supreme Court of India need more than 2years time to give the Final decision.

Already LAW commission had advices to make the adultery LAW gender Neutral , still government is sleeping. As per law if a women is not divorced and marry to other man the marriage to be termed as null and void , but in DV act the loop whole they try to manipulate and file domestic violence act to hide their own crime, where as such women should had been punished for cheating and fraud.

But to decide the simple question in a case SC already passed more than two years. Today in SC I witness to observe the argument of Mr. Mahesh Tiwari, a Supreme court Lawyer, make strong argument to dismiss such cases immediately to save the Natural Justice system of India and person can't take advantage of her own wrong doing along with came in court with UN-clean hands.

I thought it is against any natural justice system where a person got cheated and the women done the crime , the Court instead of Punishing her for her wrong doing , accepting a cases in the name of Domestic violence act and harass the man more than 2 years and Sc will do justice to such Husbands who are victim of such cases, but the order not passed and on request the opposite party now Indra Jai Singh will argue the cases, where as she is not involved in this cases since now.

When opposite party unable to give any valid argument divert the issue to the famous anti-male Lawyer Ms. Indra Jai Singh is going to argue in SC in next date with the logic such cases should not be dismissed as that will effect a lot of women, as she drafted the LAW for any women , let she hide her previous marriage 100 times and keep doing so, but she should not be punished.

Let the natural Justice system get killed , let a women do crime, cheat but she should not be punished. Till date Sc had not came under all media trails or the anti-men radical groups pressure as earlier Sc had already clarified :

35. No doubt the view we are taking would exclude many women who have had a live in relationship from the benefit of the DV Act 2005, but then it is not for this Court to legislate or amend the law. Parliament has used the expression `relationship in the nature of marriage’ and not `live in relationship’. The Court in the grab of interpretation cannot change the language of the statute.

Let wait and see who win the Natural Justice System of India or anti-male sentiments with the ideology , a women can't be punished for her any wrong doing in this country and they born in Raja Harish Chandra Family( never lie).

On 21^st October 2010, a Supreme Court bench by Justice Markandey Katju and Justice T.S.Thakur ordered that Live-in Partners cannot be equated with legally wedded spouses and a woman in a live-in relationship cannot demand her male partner to maintain her by giving money every month.

Virag Dhulia, India Liaison Officer for National Coalition for Men (NCFM) has made a press statement earlier :

• The concept of women demanding money from men to maintain their life style is completely unacceptable in this era.
• Men are not “Economic Slaves” that they have to keep giving money and gifts every month to women, girl friends, Keeps, concubines, part time lovers, sexual partners, mistresses for decades or whole life even after the end of the relationship.
• Women are no way different than men except few minor physiological differences and they can work to maintain themselves just the way any single man maintains himself.
• Today, Sexual relationships between men and women are mutual. Only an idiot can assume that in a sexual relationship female is the giver and male is the taker. Law Makers must put an end to this practice of maintenance, alimony, compensations to women just due to some mutual sexual or emotional relationships for short or long periods of time.
• Society and media must stop encouraging greed and economic parasitism in women. Women are equal to men and women have the freedom and choice to work, earn and maintain their life style.
• If any child is born out of these sexual relationships, live-in relationships or one night stands, then the child’s proper upbringing is the shared responsibility of both the biological parents.

Today, when many societies in the world are eliminating maintenance/alimony/Palimony to wives and are instead urging women to just work and be financially independent, it is outrageous that our Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaisingh goes on to argue in a non-Government case and demands that a man pay Rs.500 every month to one of his sexual partners for many decades in future just like a “Free ATM Machine”. It appears that 70 year old Indira Jaisingh would like women to lead life as economic parasites.

NCFM hails the Supreme Court judgment, which now corrects many misinterpretations that Domestic Violence Act has created. Incidentally, the domestic violence act was drafted by Indira Jaisingh herself and she made this act to “Demand Money from Men Act”, even when there are separate laws related to maintenance. Nowhere in the world, are Women allowed to demand monthly money indefinitely from partner/spouse, while accusing the partner of domestic violence.

Ravi Kumar (name changed), aged 32, a software Engineer has a part-time lover for last 6 months. Just last week, they had a break up. Will Ravi Kumar have to pay Rs.5000/- per month to his part time lover for rest of his life?

Why Men have to pay money to women? What is the difference between men and women apart from a few physiological differences related to sexual organs? Should these few physiological differences make one a “Free ATM Machine” for the other?

On one hand, we hear daily harangues of “Gender Equality” and on the other hand radical feminists like Indira Jaisingh would like to convert every man into “Economic Slaves” and every woman into “economic parasites”.

The sexual relations between two humans are mutual. How appropriate is it to make one sexual partner maintain and pay to the other like a Slave for decades? It appears the radical feminists like Indira Jaisingh would like to define every sexual relationship between a man and woman as “Marriage” on one hand, while actively promoting live-in relationships in the society on the other hand.

A Live-in relationship or a “one night stand” is not a marriage. It’s absurd if someone mistakes them as marriage. Men must not be forced to pay money indefinitely to women whether it is live-in-relationship or it is a marriage. Its time society stops encouraging economic parasitism and tells women to just work and be financially independent.

Link to the judgment

Indira Jaisingh was always a male hater. Given a chance, she can also push courts to order men to pay maintenance to their female colleagues at work citing some imaginary office romance. We are heading towards a society where women are independent and men are no longer treated as “Free ATM Machines”. Women in urban and also rural India can just work to maintain themselves. They can become clerks, bus conductors, traffic policewomen, vegetable vendors, soldiers, teachers and they can do almost all jobs that men do and earn their livelihood.

It’s very important to note that in this landmark judgment the Honorable judges have referred to appropriate judgments of courts of United States of America and have told to “Google” for these judgments and terms.

The Judgment says:

In our opinion a `relationship in the nature of marriage’ is akin to a common law marriage. Common law marriages require that although not being formally married:-

(a) The couple must hold themselves out to society as being akin to spouses.

(b) They must be of legal age to marry.

(c) They must be otherwise qualified to enter into a legal marriage, including being unmarried.

(d) They must have voluntarily cohabited and held themselves out to the world as being akin to spouses for a significant period of time.

In our opinion not all live in relationships will amount to a relationship in the nature of marriage to get the benefit of the Domestic Violence Act of 2005. To get such benefit the conditions mentioned by us above must be satisfied, and this has to be proved by evidence. If a man has a `keep’ whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a relationship in the nature of marriage’.

35. No doubt the view we are taking would exclude many women who have had a live in relationship from the benefit of the DV Act 2005, but then it is not for this Court to legislate or amend the law. Parliament has used the expression `relationship in the nature of marriage’ and not `live in relationship’. The Court in the grab of interpretation cannot change the language of the statute.

Request all honest citizen of India , Join SIF Team to Stop such legal terrorism against Indian men and demand to replace the word "Husband/wife" to "Spouse" and "Men/Women" to "Person"  to all related LAW or policy like all over world follow instead of making assumption that all Women born in Raja Harish Chandra family ( never lie) and all Men born in Criminal family.

PPT to stop the legal terrorism

(Crime Is Crime. Punishment should be irrespective of gender, religion and caste. Let us be honest and fight for truth)

Are LAW Maker failed to save family?

FAMILY Court lawyers and counselors who see the break-up of every kind of human relationship, say that relationships between human beings are a complex phenomenon beyond the ken of logic. Not surprisingly, even the best legal minds in the country have been able to barely give a meaning to the word 'family', but no legal status. "The family, believe it or not, has no legal persona," says the energetic Supreme Court Lawyer Mr. Mahesh Tiwari , who is Legal Advisor of Save Family Foundation , Delhi( SFF), an Foundation which works to save the family as a social institution and associate with the movement "Save Indian Family ( SIF)",

"Thus, the inherent conflict between the individual rights of a member and the collective rights of the family is apparent in every litigation in the Family Court.

Strangely, though a major objective of the Family Court Act of 1984 is the preservation of the family as the foundation of society, it offers relief in every case by determining the rights and liabilities of individuals in biased way towards wives only and treated the Husband as a Free ATM machine only, rather than of the family.

The gray areas between the rights of the individuals and the welfare of the family become the battleground for concerned parties, due to one sided biased law like 498A,DV act , Child custody LAW, maintenance and alimony LAW under IPC125, who feel that matrimonial laws should be amended to suit right women or men, instead of pitting the two sexes against one another.

"The Family Court is a theater of unimaginable conflicts. The usual issues behind these conflicts are: feminists vs. anti-feminists; individuals vs. society and the legal system vs. the right to privacy of an individual. The Family Court Act of 1984 was passed by the Central Government because of the pressure built up by various non-governmental organizations, which unanimously felt that matrimonial and family law cases were suffering from long delays in the civil courts. Special courts were required for quick disposal of such cases so that the parties to a divorce or separation could go on with their lives and redesign their destinies. The Act encouraged and empowered various state governments to set up Family Courts in all cities with a population of over one million people.

"The first state to set up a Family Court was Rajasthan. Maharashtra followed in 1989. Today, Family Courts function in nearly 60 cities of India. Their objectives, according to the Act, include the preservation of the family as an institution, speedy disposal of cases and a re-conciliatory approach while handling human relationships. Hence, the Court is obliged to provide the services of counselors for couples seeking a separation of divorce." But the biased criminal Act like 498A, DV act and IPC 125 totally destroyed the basic aim of the family court's function.

The work of the Family Court invariably centers on the rights of a wife only, irrespective she is right or wrong. This is assumption that marriage or its break-up seriously affects her status and property rights, as their own parents also refuse them to give any property right in spite of the well settle LAW of this country.

Factors such as religion, community, custom, tradition or family views determine or affect her rights. Though a court or law itself can determine the legal view, it is very difficult — almost impossible — to change the mindset of people who have lived according to the tenets of a conception that a women can never lie or never break the family for her selfish motive, which is totally wrong in 21 st century.

For example, according to the 1974 Maintenance Laws, Rs 500 per month was the standard allowance for a divorced or separated wife. Rs 750 per month was allotted to each child. In 2000, this was changed to Rs 1,500 per month and in 2002, the upper limit of maintenance was totally removed. Result, money and property matters are so fluid and amenable manipulation in the court, that many wives, well educated and earning, prefers to show in the court they are not working, in spite of capable to do so.

Most of the divorce cases, which come to Family Courts, are based on three major reasons: Cruelty, desertion for two years or more and adultery. Of these, adultery is extremely difficult to prove. Cruelty, too, has to have a physical manifestation to be admissible as evidence in court.

Therefore, desertion remains the most common cause apart from mutual consent, where the two parties have an agreement on the terms and conditions of their separation.

But LAW like 498A , DV act and IPC 125 biased towards wives , change the whole equation and result a long litigation for both.

Social researchers regret however, that though Family Courts have been in existence for over a decade, there are no records, statistics of figures, which can point in the direction of the future of the family as the basic unit of society. Several NGOs continue to fight for the creation of a fact-and-figures bank, which could be a barometer of the health of the family in Indian society. They believe that family courts were created in the first place because of their relentless efforts, but failed to make any study about the Husband's health of conditions, result we witness more and more married men are ending their life, in 2011 as per Crime bure, 62000 more men had end their life compared to 30000 married women.

"There are media reports that the number of divorces in Indian cities — specially in Mumbai and Delhi — is increasing by leaps and bounds," but some famous women activists are arguing that it is the women's right and women empowerment, result child's are force to live under a "Father less Society" and the husband treated as a "Free ATM machine" only.


However, women wanting a larger slice of life today are a major reason for marital break-ups. They are aware of their rights and tolerate less injustice. Parents of women also support the break-up when they see the benefit they will get in terms of money and sympathy form the society.

Further, there is hardly any stigma attached to the word divorce today. We had witness, a lot of women remarried not twice , even trice also , as a example take case of Noida ,telecasted in Star News , a women married 3 times in 3 years span and fighting the third divorce case . This is not a mare exceptional case , like that a number of cases are going on in the court.


Even elders believe in the right of a woman to have a worthwhile life rather than rot in a no-win relationship. More and more families show that even one caring person can do the job of rearing a balanced, healthy child. The definition of a family is changing fast.

"Also, marriages now break at any age. People decide to separate after a few months of marriage or when they are older. And more women seek counseling or dissolution of a marriage because there are more support systems available to them rather than the husband alone. Women can choose to experience motherhood through adoption (Sushmita Sen) or through relationships with their beloveds without marriage (Neena Gupta, Sanjana Kapoor and many others). In the foreseeable future, they may become mothers through assisted reproductive technologies too."

It is natural that marriages and love relationships in celebrity-land are under more stress than others. Here, one partner may be successful beyond imagination and the other may be required to play the second-fiddle eternally.

A husband may be far more successful or popular and hi-profile compared to the wife or lover. The family or a wife may not 'approve' of the attitude of a husband who sets goals for himself and follows them single-minded. In most hyped-up industries, celebrities work constantly with equally attractive members of the opposite sex. Attractions happen and marital or loyalty vows are broken more easily than is common. Celebrity break-ups become worse when they attract publicity, leaving no room for privacy. Success, the need to hang on at the top and money — as well as personal grooming and fitness — are top priorities in most celebrity lives today. There is no time or patience of the spouse, children or other relatives.

As one prominent actress says, "People don't change. Circumstances change and force the person to go with the tide of time."

So at the end the question remained unanswered Are LAW Maker failed to save family?

A men established himself as Best Son , great Brother, but why he had termed as Criminal when it comes to as a role of Husband, why? Does to be a best son or great Brother is crime in India for a man?

If the answer is No, are they ready to review the whole marriage related LAW towards "Save family" or it is their hidden agenda to convert this country to a "Father less society" by killing the institution of marriage in India?

PPT to stop the legal terrorism

Join SIF Team to Stop this legal terrorism of India and demand to replace the word Husband/wife to Spouse to all marriage related LAW or policy like all over world follow instead of making assumption that all wives born in Raja Harish Chandra family ( never lie) and all husbands born in Criminal family.

(Crime Is Crime. Punishment should be irrespective of gender, religion and caste. Let us be honest and fight for truth)

Learning to Say ‘No” to your wife illogical Demand!!

Learning to Say ‘No” to your wife illogical Demand!!

Learning to Say ‘No” to your wife illogical Demand!!

Parliament has just passed the Domestic Violence Bill. But the social conditioning and attitudes are different to alter, finds out an Exclusive SIF (Save Indian Family Yahoo Group) survey.

Sushmita and Amit (Names Changed) appeared to be the Ideal Couple. There were “ no issues “ in their relationship , except Amit’s occasional complaint about Sushmita use of abusive language against his parents and sister and some time she will take some money from his money parts without his knowledge . He used to get hurt , but Amit would dismiss it as a once –in –blue-moon behaviors till one day Sushmita kicked his 65 years old mother , when she came to their house for a evening for few hours . Amit was shocked!!!!

Silence and Suffering!!!

“There’s nothing surprising about these behaviors” says a renewed psychiatrist. “This is how things begin “She explains. “Initially he (Amit) doesn’t mind the swearing because he didn’t realize that this was just another form of abuse – She explains. “After all most of us do curse from time to time “She adds.

Then again boy’s who have grown up seeing their families and under stand that a daughter –in –law having a Whole Sale free license to abuse their Mother-in-law and Sister –in –law, as our Government thinks that all our mother and sister are criminal, for them women means only daughter in law, so only 498A, anti dowry law are there, where without any investigation all your relatives will put behind the bar irrespective of the complain is false or true. But in case of Dishonest Daughter-in-law, there is no provision by which you can give a small warning to them.


As a result all husbands believe to continue the relationship despite the violence and abuse, tend to school themselves into thinking that it is accepted behaviors. Indeed for most of the boys in India, abuse is accepted as part and parcel of a relationship – pre or post –marital.

Level of abuse:-

An online yahoo group Survey done at SIF (Save Indian Family) , throw up some interesting results . According to member, 98 % of husband suffers verbal, mental and economical abuse from their wife and in-laws. Only 10 % categorized insulting language by wife as abuse .Then again 90% husband said they were willing to forgive their partners.

Say Supreme Court Lawyer, Mr. Mahesh Tiwari, “Our society is biased . We make our boys more docile and therefore, more prone to verbal and mental as well as Economical abuse. But a girl is never fed on such views. It is because of this attitude that a wife can not take “NO” for an answer, this is where problem begins “

Why take it??

Compulsions – economic, social and emotional. A 38 Years old husband and a victim of abuse by wife confess that he is ready to forgive his partner because he “loves her too much “. A large no of husbands accept that they will continue to a relationship with their abusive partner and will sacrifice their age old parents and sister.

Indian Old Parents and Pregnant Sisters in JAIL?

The question now, in the proposed domestic Violence Bill the word “Verbal “Mental and Economic abuse , really justify and gives the right picture that only women suffers the same , husband never suffer the same ??

Mr. Praveen says , this DV Act will lead India to massive Single parenting System , a lot of Un wanted child will be in our society the way in Us 75 % Child born with out a wed lock , In Ireland only less than 2 % people get married relationship .

Another Step to Kill the Institution of Indian Marriage System - Part -2

On that country, women used to beg to men for a live together, forget a marriage, used to beg for a part time father!!!!

Our government is really concern for our honest women??

When they will understand that killing of Institution of marriage is called a “Legal Terrorism “..

Already Supreme Court of India described regarding the misuse of 498A. This Domestic Violence Bill will totally kill the Institution of Marriage system in India which a lot of outsider country want.

Let wait and watch, when our Government will wake up and do some real women well fare instead of playing this Men vs. Women game.


Disclimer :This is totally writer personnel Views only. You may have different opinion. The name and place changed to protect the Persons Identity.

Every Men in India are under high risk of #Fakecases at Home, Office, Road due to multiple anti-Men #Unfairlaw - which became Blackmailing/Extortion Tool. To survive or #FightBack knowledge is Key. Law is not any rocket Science. Buy & start Read Law Books Now!

When a women rape a man it called Love as per LAW, Society and media..right?

When i read the News article in Times of India : When live-in turns sour, man becomes ‘rapist’: Times of India News.

CHENNAI: Instances of long-time companions turning against their boyfriends, and accusing them of rape, are on the rise. Affairs gone sour, break-ups and failed live-in relationships are being taken to police by women, who charge their ex-boyfriends with rape, police say, conceding that such complaints are being lodged more frequently than before.
"We do try to strike a compromise between the man and woman, who are mostly young, but we are left with no choice if a woman sticks to her stance," a senior police officer said.

Recent examples include an IT company boss who was slapped with rape charges by his former employee, one year after she quit the job. There was also the case of a hearingimpaired man who was booked for rape after he broke up with his long-time companion. She complained to the police that he deserted her after they had lived together virtually as man and wife.
Once an FIR is registered, the prospect of arrest gets real for the man in such cases. "An arrest can ruin his self-esteem , his business and public profile," said former special public prosecutor for human rights court V Kannadasan. "Of course police have no choice but to register a case, but arrest is entirely their discretion and it should be exercised most judiciously," he said, pointing out that a couple's intimacy for a prolonged period should be taken into account by police while probing such cases.
In the recent past, police have registered a case against controversial godman Nithyananda based on allegations made by an exdevotee . It is for the police to unearth the truth, given the fact she had claimed that the godman raped her 45 times. Another incident involves a private company boss, who was arrested on charges of rape. Interestingly, here too, the two complaints from as many ex-employees came more than a year after the alleged rape took place.
In a few of these cases, the alleged perpetrator of the crime and his victim may have shared an emotional or intimate relationship , thus blurring the line between sexual exploitation and a consensual affair.
The social context remains the fact that a large number of young professionals are increasingly living together or close to each other, say police. Sharing a roof or living-in as partners too is common in this age group, they say. But sometimes, such arrangements are brought to an end without mutual consent, leaving the couple bitter.
Treasurer of the Madras High Court Advocate Association T K S Sudha, admits that some women do lodge rape complaints with the motive of exacting revenge after a relationship sours. "The Supreme Court has approved live-in relationships to an extent, as it has held that the girl is entitled to claim maintenance from her live-in partner. But, to allege rape after being in such a relationship is taking the liberty too far. It is abuse,"
CASE HISTORY
Hearing impaired man gets arrested on rape charges after partner accuses him of going back on his promise to marry her A rape case was registered against controversial godman Nithyananda after a devotee claimed that she was raped 45 times Managing director of a private firm was arrested after two rape cases were filed by ex-employees , a year after the incident.

THE FINE PRINT

Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code lays down six circumstances to qualify for a rape. Of this, three are about consent, two about 'misconception' , and one is about the statutory age limit Poilce invoke Section 417 of IPC along with Section 376 (punishment for rape) while a man is arrested for rape. Section 417 deals with punishment for cheating and it prescribes a maximum imprisonment of one year with or without fine IF THE ALLEGED RAPE CONTINUED FOR DAYS OR TOGETHER WEEKS OR , MONTHS AT MOST IT COULD BE A CASE OF CHEATING OR BREACH OF TRUST.

We had witness several cases where a women dump men and go to another men , does on that cases a MAN can cry he had been Raped? The answer is no , then why the same is reversed when a women cry for rape? If dumping your partner is crime, why the same is not crime for women?

The bottom line is :

When a women rape a man it called Love as per LAW, Society and media..right?

 Any small child also can say such law or act is not only unfair , it is a clear injustice to men and to be termed as Blackmailing and extortion by greedy women. When two adult person stay together as per their own wish and after some time the relationship breaks, how the same can be termed as Rape?

But LAW makers prefer to keep Blind eye and promote such injustice against men and if they do not stop such biased view and promote the extortion and legal terrorism in the name of Rape, the false and fabricated Rape cases will only increase and then one more law will be made or NCW/WCD will demand increase the punishment in Rape cases .

First convert every break up as Rape case , then increase the crime against women statistics and then demand another new law , increase the punishment , which our great law makers, Supreme court of India and media often failed to understand .

Consensual sex is not rape: Supreme Court , but Police/Lower court and media never ready to accept the same. and misuse the Rape LAW qs a whole sale free lincence in this country.

Recent Judgement of Delhi Sesson Court , terming that "A man having sex with a women on promise of Marriage and then refuse to be termed as rape" reported in Hindustan times.

This is total violation of Supreme court's earlier Gudie line, which neither the Judge or Hindustan time's Jurnalsit who had reported the News , seems aware:

Consensual sex is not rape: Supreme Court

New Delhi, August 29: A man having sex with a girl after obtaining her consent on the promise of a marriage does not necessarily constitute rape even if he retracts on his pledge, the Supreme Court has ruled.

Such retraction by the accused would amount to rape only if the consent was obtained by coercion or threat, a bench of Justices Arijit Pasayat and D K Jain said while upholding an appeal filed by the accused Pradeep Kumar. The apex court maintained that there was no straitjacket formula for determining whether consent given by the girl was voluntary or given under a misconception of fact as it has to be decided on the basis of the circumstances and surrounding factors which led to the alleged consensual sex.
"The court must consider the evidence before it and the surrounding circumstances before reaching a conclusion, because each case has its own peculiar facts which may have a bearing on the question whether the consent was voluntary or was given under a misconception of fact," the apex court observed.

Pradeep Kumar had filed the appeal against the orders of a sessions court and the Patna High Court which rejected his plea for discharge from a case filed against him by a girl who got him booked under IPC Sections 376 IPC (rape) and 406 (breach of trust) for "retracting" on his promise to marry her.

In his appeal before the apex court, the accused claimed that the victim had consensual sex with him and hence the charge of rape or breach of trust cannot be entertained.

( Refer the Supreme court Judgement Appeal (crl.) 1086 of 2007)

---

But Delhi season court had failed to consider why she had been in a sexual relationship before marriage, is it her birth right to term any Tom/Dick or harry a rapist, if the guy do not find she is suitable for his rest of the life?

When she is so concern about protection of virginity, why they go for sexual relationship before marriage?

If at all a Promise of Marriage made , maximum it can be termed as Cheating or Breach of trust, but how it became a Rape?

Further we witness a number of cases the girls( so called lovers) are dumping the boys also and do not marry after college, specially in those cases where the girls get better earning man in their life after ward to fulfill their dream of lavish lifestyle through marriage, so do those boys have any right in the law to file Rape case against their cheater Girls friends?

One hand as per Domestic Violence LAW, our LAW makers and all radical women activists already made live-in-relationship women had got all the legal rights ( even a one night relationship) , among the college we witness maximum young boys and girls are having per-marriage sex in the name of women and sexual liberation, strong avocation by WCD ministers that in the School itself we should teach sex education among the child to stop the AIDS, continuous provocation that do not marry a unknown man, first know each other form all the aspects, as marriage is a eye opener and love is blind.. etc, on the other hand terming some one a Rapist only on the basis that the guy had refused to marry a girl after consensual sex , how much justified , only our LAW makers can answer.

One hand a women will be raped by a gang of people and then will be killed and police/media will continue to search to find the real rapist years to years , on the other hand so called living greedy women will file false Rape cases , if they feel the man do not find suitable her for a real life partner due any reasons.

So , in this country as a women you have all the wholesale free lincence to term any man a "Rapist" , let you rape the him, that does not matter!!!!

When a women rape a man it called Love as per LAW, Society and media..right?

Wonder why Rape law should not be made Gender Equal, if we fell women do not rape the man and instead of hide behind a gender biased law , let the so called radical women forces come forward to prove that they do not rape the man.

Can they have such honesty or it is White lie to protect their own crime and refuse to accept the LAW commissions long back recommendations to make the Rape LAW Gender Equal.

We know if the rape law made gender equal , every year at least 5 times more women will be convected than man, as per present definition of Rape and if we have Judges like this , who think sex with the promise of marriage is Rape in this country.

Request all honest Media guys, Law makers and common citizen, wake up and make the law sensible, logical and gender neutral instead of any assumption that all women born in "Raja Harish Chandra family" and all men born in criminal family. 

or

Be ready tomorrow WCD/NCW will demand no punishment for women in murder case, drink and drive cases as the same crime done by few women, what a logic!!