Showing posts with label men organizations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label men organizations. Show all posts

Wednesday, 9 July 2014

SC:No abuse of arrests under anti-dowry law, time to make 498A bailable


The Committee fears that failure to do so might leave no option except to dilute the law by making the same non-cognizable and bailable. In this context, the Committee recommends certain additional measures as contained in the succeeding paragraphs.




No Dowry arrests till magistrate's nod: SC , why such order made ? Look at the Graph , one hand the arrest of people is increasing in 498a , but after long trail Court found more than 85% people are not guilty. 


From the supreme court July,2014 judgment , it had proved beyond reasonable dought the government and police had failed to check the misuse of 498a and so the time had came to make the same bailable , demand Save Family Foundation and their associated organizations , as from the past experience , we witness such Judgments never followed by Police or by Government.
If we go through the NCRB data of 2013 recently released , the arrest had further incresed from 1.97L to 2.2 L , where as it was expected the same will be reduced as per new provision of CRPC41.

This is the 5th time Supreme Court had highlighted the need of stop the misuse of Dowry law like #IPC498a , but Government or Police had never taken any corrective actions.
In the last Parliament committee report by Rajya Sabah , it was clearly mentioned if the misuse of 498A does not reduced they have no option but to make it bailable.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday said women were increasingly using the anti-dowry law to harass in-laws and restrained police from mechanically arresting the husband and his relatives on mere lodging of a complaint under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
Citing very low conviction rate in such cases, it directed the state governments to instruct police "not to automatically arrest when a case under Section 498A of IPC is registered but to satisfy themselves about the necessity for arrest under the parameters (check list) provided under Section 41 of criminal procedure code".
Section 41 lays down a 9-point check list police to weigh the need to arrest after examining the conduct of the accused, including possibility of his absconding.
Expressing exasperation over rampant misuse of Section 498A, a bench of Justices C K Prasad and P C Ghose said if police arrested the accused, the magistrate should weigh the preliminary evidence against the Section 41 checklist before allowing further detention.
"The magistrate, while authorising detention of the accused shall peruse the report furnished by the police officer in terms of Section 41 and only after recording its satisfaction, the magistrate will authorize detention," the bench said.
It also said that this check-list for arrest and detention would apply to all offences, which are punished with a prison term less than 7 years. Punishment under Section 498A is a maximum of three years but it had been made a cognizable and non-bailable offence, which made grant of bail to the accused a rarity in courts.
But the court singled out the dowry harassment cases as the most abused and misused provision, though the legislature had enacted it with the laudable object to prevent harassment of women in matrimonial homes.

Writing the judgment for the bench, Justice Prasad said there had been a phenomenal increase in dowry harassment cases in India in the last few years. "The fact that Section 498A is a cognizable and non-bailable offence has lent it a dubious place of pride amongst the provisions that are used as weapons rather than shield by disgruntled wives," he said.
"The simplest way to harass is to get the husband and his relatives arrested under this provision. In a quite number of cases, bed-ridden grand-fathers and grand-mothers of the husbands, their sisters living abroad for decades are arrested," he said.
The bench quoted "Crime in India 2012 Statistics" published by National Crime Records Bureau to say that nearly 2 lakh people were arrested in India in 2012 under Section 498-A, which was 9.4% more than in 2011.
"Nearly a quarter of those arrested under this provision in 2012 were women i.e. 47,951 which depicts that others and sisters of the husbands were liberally included in their arrest net. Its share is 6% out of the total persons arrested under the crimes committed under Indian Penal Code. It accounts for 4.5% of total crimes committed under different sections of penal code, more than any other crimes excepting theft and hurt," it said.
"The rate of charge-sheeting in cases under Section 498A is as high as 93.6%, while the conviction rate is only 15%, which is lowest across all heads. As many as 3,72,706 cases are pending trial of which on current estimate, nearly 3,17,000 are likely to result in acquittal," the bench said illustrating the misuse of Section 498A as a tool to harass husband and his relatives.
Describing arrest as a humiliating experience apart from curtailing the freedom, the bench said police have not shed their colonial hangover despite six decades of independence and were still considered "as a tool of harassment, oppression, and surely not considered a friend of public".
The need for caution in exercising the drastic power of arrest had been emphasized time and again by courts but has not yielded results, the court said and tasked the magistrates to check illegal arrests.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1277 OF 2014
date of order: 2 July 2014
LANDMARK JUDGEMENT OF J. CHANDRAMOULI KR. PRASAD ISSUED TODAY
DIRECTION TO POLICE....DON'T JUMP AND ARREST AT DROP OF A HAT....SERVE NOTICE UNDER 41A
Our endeavour in this judgment is to ensure that police  officers do not arrest accused unnecessarily and Magistrate do not authorize detention  casually and mechanically. In order to ensure what we have observed above, we give the following direction:

 (1) All the State Governments to instruct its police officers not to automatically arrest when a case under Section 498-A of the IPC is registered but to satisfy themselves
 about the necessity for arrest under the parameters laid down above flowing from  Section 41, Cr.PC;
(2) All police officers be provided with a check list containing specified sub-clauses
 under Section 41(1)(b)(ii);
(3) The police officer shall forward the check list duly filed and furnish the reasons and materials which necessitated the arrest, while forwarding/producing the accused before the Magistrate for further detention;
(4) The Magistrate while authorising detention of the accused shall peruse the report
 furnished by the police officer in terms aforesaid and only after recording its satisfaction, the Magistrate will authorize detention;
(6) Notice of appearance in terms of Section 41A of Cr.PC be served on the accused  within two weeks from the date of institution of the case, which may be extended by the Superintendent of Police of the District for the reasons to be recorded in writing;
(7) Failure to comply with the directions aforesaid shall apart from rendering the police officers concerned liable for departmental action, they shall also be liable to be punished for contempt of court to be instituted before High Court having territorial jurisdiction.
(8) Authorising detention without recording reasons as aforesaid by the judicial Magistrate concerned shall be liable for departmental action by the appropriate High Court.
We hasten to add that the directions aforesaid shall not only apply to the cases under Section 498-A of the I.P.C. or Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, the case in hand, but also such cases where offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term which may be less than seven years or which may extend to seven years; whether with or without fine.

We direct that a copy of this judgment be forwarded to the Chief Secretaries as also the Director Generals of Police of all the State Governments and the Union Territories and the Registrar General of all the High Courts for onward transmission and ensuring its compliance.


Must watch :


DD NEWS Hindi : http://youtu.be/8_kS_QjzpJ8
DD NEWS English : http://youtu.be/aZCD4wqNch0








Posted by at No comments:
Family problem, Help men, Men Life Style, Men NGO , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, 29 May 2014

Men as victims of Marital Rape




Rape is Rape. It is not a gender issue. When a woman rapes (sex without mutual consent) our Indian society colors the act with terms like loving or affectionate. Sadly some women consider such acts as their birth right over men. If a man tries to fight back or resist or even dreams of speaking the truth, he himself is labelled as rapist instead of being considered a Victim of rape.
 
Rape is rape, regardless of the relationship between the rapist and the victim. It can be a total stranger; someone you recognize by sight, but have never really communicated with; someone you know superficially, a neighbor or a colleague; a friend, a Girl-friend or a former Girlfriend; a live-in partner, or a former partner; someone you are married to or have been married to in the past.
 
As per Rape law, any sex without mutual consent should be considered as “Rape”. However the blinded Indian LAW assumes that the Victim of Rape can only be a woman and men are never “Raped”.
 
Rape is a very personal and intimate traumatic experience. Our experiences of and reactions to rape may differ widely. Although there are many similarities in the way that we feel about being the victim of rape, regardless of the relationship between us and the rapist, there are differences between stranger and intimate rape. In this section we are trying to describe and offer an understanding of some of the specific problems regarding marital rape (or rape by an intimate) as opposed to stranger rape.
 
Please note that in this page we refer to wives and husbands, however, it can be understood to refer to all rapes perpetrated by an intimately related person. Also, we are only looking at rape and sexual assault on men, since this is by far the most common situation but never recognized by Government or LAW makers. The result of such heinous crimes is that every year, we witness twice as many Husbands committing suicide than wives. This statistic is clear from the National Crime Records Bureau report (2005). Rape and sexual abuse also occur with similar frequency in same-sex relationships.

Historically, all cultures have had a concept of a spouses' conjugal right  to sexual intercourse with each other to curb illegitimate children and also to start apart from being an animal. The proposition of Christian teachings which influence Western culture need be considered; in particular, St. Paul's teaching: "For the wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does; likewise the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does. Do not deprive one another except perhaps by agreement for a set time, to devote yourselves to prayer". Such teachings led to the institution of marriage.

However with time, women raised their voice, created new laws to shut men up and gained a wholesale free license to rape husbands. We have often heard Feminist, male hating ministers openly telling media “It is the turn to suffer the men”, “Do not trust men, trust condom”.. but still Indian men prefer to keep silence than object to such comments openly.

·        Different types of rape

Marital rape is generally sub-divided into three categories: those rapes, which involve a degree of violence, those that use enough force to control the victim, known as 'force-only' rapes, and sadistic rapes.
·         Violent rape occurs, as the name suggests, when the abuser uses enough physical violence to cause injury to the victim (biting, digging nails in, damaging private parts). Examples would include the wife punching his Husband or injuring him with her nails or teeth, as he is too tired after hard work in office and wants some rest when he comes home rather than satisfy his wives sexual lust. Such rapes either become part of a violent assault, or the violence becomes part of marital rape on husband. Many rapist wives will also force their Husbands to submit to sexual acts after a physical assault, either to prove her power to him or to further intimidate and humiliate him. Commonly in such instances if the Husband should refuse such an act, the threat of further violence (or another assault on him!) will soon lead him into compliance.
·         'Force-only' rape is usually termed when a wife uses just enough force to control or hold her husband in specific position, eg holding him down by his arms or wrists to prevent him defending himself or escaping. This form of rape is common where there is a larger contrast between the age difference and strength of abuser and victim, or in abusive relationships where physical violence is infrequent or non-existent (insofar as one does not categories sexual assault itself as a violent act). In most cases of 'force-only' rape, coercion plays a large part. The victim may also be so confused and numbed by constant emotional abuse, that he simply does not know how to act or react when sex is forced on him.
·         Sadistic rape is gradually increasing in frequency. In such rapes, in addition to the rape itself, the victim is either forced to comply with or undergo deeds designed to further humiliate him. Examples of this would be the abuser/rapist forces the husband to watch a pornographic movie, making threats of seeking sexual pleasure from her ex or new-boyfriend if he does not comply. She would often demean the husband as ‘good for nothing’ in bed, while acting out a fantasy of torturer, or using repeated sex in spite of repeated requests by husband to get some rest or sleep since he has to go to work the next day. Sadistic rape may or may not involve further violence. Some people consider buggery as a sadistic form of rape, since its effect on victim is often particularly humiliating.
It is difficult to clearly separate one form of rape from another, since rape can involve a combination of above mentioned types. For instance, the rapist may use coercion tactics and enough force to control the victim initially, but then will use increased violence if the victim struggles. Many victims of marital rape feel guilty for not having struggled more, or have been told that if they did not try to physically fight their abuser and thereby sustained injuries, they have not suffered 'real rape'. This can be extremely distressing and adds to the emotional, psychological, physical and moral trauma already experienced. What has to be remembered is that when you are living with your abuser, you are often very finely tuned to her, employing numerous coping mechanisms to limit the damage to yourself. You may realize either consciously or subconsciously that if you struggle, she is likely to get violent or take her anger out on you in other ways or abuse your child, ill treat your parents or relatives, make false police complaints of Domestic Violence and make attempts to abuse you financially etc.
 
Other reasons why men do not fight back are fear of disturbing children in the household, lest they should witness their father being raped; a sense of shock or confusion at what is happening which paralyses him; and real concern for his abuser, which results in him not wanting to do anything which may harm or injure his rapist even to the determent of himself. But by far the most common and compelling reason is the fear that if he tries to fight back, everyone including the law and society will term him as “Rapist” rather than acknowledging him as a Victim of “Rape”.
 
It appears that as per Rape LAW and Domestic Violence Act, all Indian women are born in Raja Harish Chandra’s family i.e. they never lie. Whereas all laws and our society believe all men to be rapists and born in Rapist families. Even a Supreme Court Judgment says, a women’s verbal statement is sufficient to term any Tom, Dick and Harry as Rapist. This is possible even if she doesn’t undergo a medical examination to examine whether a rape has even happened or not.

The Unanswered Questions:

Does Rape/Sexual harassment happen at Workplace or Home? Why do we think only women can face sexual assault? Do Men Never face "Sexual Harassment at Workplace or home" as per the wording/action as per proposed Act by WCD?


It is another truth that even: 

"The Law Commission in one of its Report dated March, 2000 had  recommended that laws relating to rape (Sec 375 IPC) be made gender  neutral.


 
It had deliberated about widening the scope of offence under Section 375 & Section 376 IPC, and for these to be made more comprehensive to bring it in tune with current times.

But the recommendation was not accepted.  Why?
  
 
Sex or comment of sex, without mutual consent is termed as rape/sexual harassment as per LAW, then why it considered that men do not face the these situations?"


 
Will our Lawmaker ever take the moral responsibility and courage to replace the words “Men/women” by the word “Person” and replace words “husband/wife” by the word “Spouse”?

Or
Do we continue to suffer and support the ideology/wisdom and action planning of radical Feminist groups “It is the turn to suffer of men ”.
Posted by at 2 comments:
Family problem, Help men, Men Life Style, Men NGO , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, 15 March 2013

Men’s Rights Activists are dismayed at lack of political will to protect men or Boys.

Men are Victim of Work Place Sexual Harassment


Activists fighting for men’s rights have expressed extreme amount of displeasure and dismay at the Cabinet’s decision on the rape law.
Background:
The discussion around the rape law gained ground after all media channels unanimously hyped a single case of Delhi gang-rape (December 16, 2012) and made it a national issue inciting public emotions against the male gender and accusing the Government not doing enough to protect women. This was despite the already existing toughly anti-male rape laws and 15 other laws targeted specifically against men which were draconian, barbaric and unconstitutional in nature.
Bowing down to the pressure from the feminist dominated media, the Govt. formed a committee under retired judge Justice Verma whose recommendations sought to convert every intra-gender (male-female) transaction into a non-bailable offense, punishable at the whim and fancy of the woman. All this was done under cute names like stalking, voyeurism, eve-teasing etc. Every definition of crime was not only vague but one-sided. None of the definitions included abuse of men by women.
However, on 3rd February 2013, the Government passed an Ordinance called the Rape Ordinance which identified a wide variety of sexual assaults affecting both the genders and passed a gender neutral ordinance which covered male victims of sexual assault as well. This was a historic move wherein, for the first time in the history of India, a gender neutral law was passed which recognized the abuse of men as well and sought to protect them.
The Shocker:
However, the feminist and the feminist dominated media were extremely unhappy about men being protected and created a lot of hue and cry over the Ordinance being gender neutral and sought to nullify it calling it anti-women.
And the shocker came on the 11th of March 2013, whence the Government actually did a U-Turn, reverting back the bill being gender biased and anti-male, renaming it as the “Anti-Rape Law” instead of erstwhile “Sexual Assault Bill”, leaving male victims of such offenses high and dry.
The consequences:
While, as we all know, it won’t be the case that with the passage of this yet another anti-male law, which does not cater to the problems of the male world, the lives of men are suddenly going to become risky.
Lives of men have always been risky as primarily it is the men who undertake huge risks in order to ensure cultural, technological and societal progress and selflessly men have lost their lives for the same, be it war or adventure or scientific inventions.
Whether it is a case of 5 army-men losing their lives attempting to safeguard the borders of India or a couple of fishermen losing their lives accidentally as they undertake daily risk of fishing in troubled waters in order to eke out a livelihood.
It’s just that, with this law, the lives of men are going to become riskier as now the streets have become extremely dangerous for men as now,
  1. Any man who gets entangled with a woman in any sort of argument, which can be due to the woman’s fault or provoked by her will be converted into a false case of stalking or voyeurism and the man would be immediately arrested. For no fault of his, the man would be fighting a frivolous criminal battle.
  2. Male victims of feminine sexual aggression, female sex offenders and female rapists would be embroiled in false rape cases wherein the perpetrator of the crime and the victim of the crime would just swap roles.
  3. Boys facing sexual assault, inappropriate touch, and sexual oppression from girls and adult female relatives including Ayaahs would continue to face the horror and grow up with an impaired psychology which will affect their quality of life at every stage. It may potentially increase criminal bent of mind in such boys as they grow up to become men and this could rather increase the crime in the society than decreasing it.
  4. Small political parties like Maharastra Navnirman Sena, Samajawadi Party, Bahujan Samajwadi Party will face greater risks as their male political cadre could be trapped in false cases of stalking and eve-teasing by opposite parties, especially big and powerful political parties, and this could be a serious blow to the political roadmap of these small parties, who now have no option but to listen to UPA 2.
  5. Increase of false cases of rape, molestation, stalking, voyeurism, etc. and the subsequent jailing and harassment of innocent men would contribute towards the growing element of Gynophobia (fear of women). This would result in men shying away from women and mingling with them. In fact, already the helplines of men’s rights activists have started ringing with queries like, “Is it OK to refuse to escort a woman at night?”, “Is it OK to refuse to a movie with a woman at night?”, etc.
  6. This will also affect the voting pattern as men’s rights activists have vowed not to vote and to discourage others from voting for either anti-male MPs or for those political parties who did not support the gender neutrality of the bill. They’d rather people to vote for independents or for parties like SP, BSP and the Trinamool Congress.
  7. As per World News in UK along more than 64000 women had been convected for sexually abuse/rape the child . As India government failed to make the Rape law gender Neutral , will not massive women from such countries like UK will come to India and abuse the child , gang rape other women/men , as in India the same is not recornised as crime? Will not India became a safe heaven for such women as there is no punishment for rape the child, gang rape to other women and man by a women?
The Problems:
It was extremely disheartening to see that the Government was bowing down before a few women organizations and backed out on its decision to provide the society with a gender neutral law. It is pertinent to mention here that the electorate of India has not voted for these women organizations, whosoever they may be.
The electorate of India has voted the UPA 2 Government to power and wrested the power of law-making in their hands and it becomes the duty of the UPA 2 Government to ensure a safe and free society for all citizens irrespective of caste, religions, sex and creed. Even the constitution of India, vide Article 14, guarantees the same. And hence, this regressive step of removing gender neutrality from the law is an unconstitutional step by UPA 2 in the event of its failure to contain the anti-male women organizations filled with male hatred.
Demands:
  1. The Houses must not pass the gender-biased version of the bill and must send it back to the Standing Committee for further review.
  2. As the Justice Verma Committee totally ignored the presentations sent by the various men’s rights groups, the said Standing Committee should invite these groups and take their views into consideration.
  3. The bill must not be passed in the absence of a strong misuse clause to prevent false cases from becoming yet another industry of extortion and revenge.
  4. Government must form National Commission for Men and Men Welfare Ministry in order to avoid such last minute hassles and rushes in law making.
  5. Only Gender Neutral laws must be passed.
  6. Women organizations with vested interests and partisan agenda must not be encouraged to such an extent that they can literally hijack the law-making process.
We end this press release with an end-note of caution that more and more anti-male laws will lead to rise in crime in the society, choice belies with the Government whether to heed to the warning or face the consequences.
Election 2014: Vote for any party, but not to Anti-Men MP.

News for Reference :

Cop's son ends life over alleged sexual harassment by woman ...

Jun 12, 2013 - NAGPUR: A five-page suicide note left by traffic cop's son Rahul Khandare, who committed suicide on May 24, says that he took the extreme ...

Wake up to the woes of sexually harassed men!

All those feminists, who had been screaming over the male atrocities, were shocked into silence reading the recent reports wherein a ...
 

Posted by at No comments:
Family problem, Help men, Men Life Style, Men NGO , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, 12 March 2013

Election 2014: Vote for any party, but not to Anti-Men MP.



Dear Citizens of India, especially husbands and their family members, I urge you to vote for any party, but NOT to vote any politician who is against men. 





Today we have more than 6 crore families suffering due to misuse of 498a that came into existence in 1983. Hon’ble Supreme Court labelled this law as ‘Legal Terrorism’ in 2005; however government has done nothing to stop this misuse. The recent Law Minister has stated that he cannot do anything to stop the misuse of 498A. His lame excuse is that any steps to curb this menace will generate ire from Women’s organisations. I ask the learned Law Minister: Is the country governed by Women Organisations? So he believes that votes of men have no value at all?

Statistics from NCRB (National Crime Records Bureau) clearly show that more than 64,000 Indian husbands end their lives every year. These are due to lack of support and due to government's anti-male, anti-family, anti-child, biased and lopsided LAWS like 498A, Domestic Violence act, CRPC125, Adultery LAW and 4 other maintenance laws. The entire Husbands’ family is deemed as a Free ATM machine and they get worse treatment than animals in India. These are due to Congress’s gender biased and one-sided gender laws and policies.

Although Supreme Court of India termed Misuse of 498A as “Unleash Legal Terrorism” and Domestic Violence act as the “most clumsily drafted LAW”. In India, as per the Domestic Violence law, irrespective of the truth, an allegation by the wife can get you, your mother, your father, sister thrown out of your own house. All it requires is a single complaint by wife. This is applicable even if any women shows apprehension “I anticipate Domestic violence against me”. It does not matter if you are a husband or a boyfriend, you will be thrown out from the house where you co-habit. Your bank accounts will be frozen. It will be upto you then to prove your innocence. She would not be expected to prove anything; a woman’s words are taken as gospel truth in India. Congress government considers all wives and daughter-in-laws to be born in Raja Harish Chandra’s family. Although lakhs of families have suffered, Congress government had not taken any corrective action and hence husbands and their families continue to suffer on a daily basis.

•Do you know who have given the wholesale free license to your wife to commit adultery and still not be classed as a crime? Anti-Men MPs.

•Do you know who have given the whole sale free license to your wife to abuse your old age parents and sisters and still not be classed as crime? Anti-Men MPs.

•Do you know who have given the whole sale free license to your wife to throw you and your elderly, frail parents from your own home? Anti-Men MPs.

•Do you know who have given the whole sale free license to your wife to kill your Unborn child and still not be classed as crime? Anti-Men MPs.

•Do you know who have given the whole sale free license to your wife to stop you from seeing your own child? Anti-Men MPs.

•Do you know that even a terrorist has the right to stay in his own home, but an Indian husband does not have any right to stay in his own home, if his wife demands the same under DV act; and who have made this law? Anti-Men MPs.

•Do you know who gave whole sale free license to your wife to beat, abuse, refuse food to your child, while you cant even question this, since questioning her will be classed as abuse? Anti-Men MPs.
•Do you know if your wife demands Rs10,000 for her kitty party and you give Rs8000, you have committed a crime by giving her less. And who drafted this law? Anti-Men MPs.

•A man or child cannot file a case of rape against a woman. However she can continue to rape you every day or cut your body into a dozen pieces. Who has drafted laws to protect such women? Anti-Men MPs.

This is the sad state of affairs in the current Legal system in India, a system created by Anti-Men Congress government.

Adultery for a wife is not a criminal offence. If anything, it is a rewarding option that generates free money for the rest of her life. However for a man, even questioning her intentions is labelled “Name calling” and is a crime as per Indian law. In such instances, the husband, his sister, his elderly mother and father can also be put behind bars under the DV act.

We have researched court records and identified that women who rush to courts to extort money from innocent husbands are often well educated, working, physically able to earn. They not only file one, but many cases such as 498A, mentioning that they were ill-treated by their husbands’ for money. However they shamelessly ask for money openly in front of Police, media and courts. Supreme court recognised these patterns and hence labelled ‘Legal terrorism’. It is also worth noting that if a wife earns money and a husband is unable to earn due to any physical disability, husband is not eligible for maintenance from the working woman. It does not matter if he had previously earned lakhs/crores and given it all to his wife.


So the question arises: Are Indian Husbands a Free ATM Machine for Indian wives? As per Anti-Male MPs and politicians, the answer is: Yes. 

In the current legal system, a wife can claim maintenance from 4 different laws, like Section24, Crpc125, section18 and Domestic Violence act. This leads to a horrifying abuse and mockery of the Indian Judiciary System. Such greedy wives file 3 to 4 different cases in different courts, in different states. I ask, is this not wastage of Judicial resources? Is this not a violation of Indian constitution, which clearly states that a person cannot be convicted for the same offence more than once? If so, why are 4 different maintenance cases allowed against a Husband, even if the husband has committed an offence?

Gender wise, Statistics of number of victims of Murders, Suicides and Accidents all over India, in Year 2009 (courtesy: Ministry of Home Affairs, Indian Government) to understand whose life in more danger: men or women?

Murder:
http://ncrb.nic.in/CII-2009-NEW/cii-2009/Table%203.3.pdf
Male Victims-24,441, Female Victims-8,718 Total Victims-33,159
Culpabale Homicide Not Amounting To Murder (Sec.304 and 308 IPC) During 2009
http://ncrb.nic.in/CII-2009-NEW/cii-2009/Table%203.4.pdf
Male Victims=3,529, Female Victims=753 Total Victims=4282
Dowry Death Convictions (75% dowry death cases are false and lead to no convictions)
http://ncrb.nic.in/CII-2009-NEW/cii-2009/Table%204.9.pdf
http://ncrb.nic.in/cii2008/cii-2008/Table%204.9.pdf
http://ncrb.nic.in/cii2007/cii-2007/Table%204.9.pdf
In 2009, 2008 and 2007 the dowry death convictions are 1882, 1948 and 1946 respectively.
These dowry deaths are too small a number for a country of 1.2 billion people.
Accidental Deaths:
http://ncrb.nic.in/CD-ADSI2009/table-1.4.pdf
Male Victims=276,333(77.4%) Female Victims=80,688 (22.6%) Total Victims=357021
Suicides:
http://ncrb.nic.in/CD-ADSI2009/table-2.5.pdf
Male Victims=81,471 Female victims=45,680 (Total Victims=127151)
(Male Victims=64.1%, female Victims=35.9%)
Total Victims of Suicide, Murder and Accidents:
Male Victims=361,333(73%) Female Victims=135,839 (27%)

Despite these statistical facts, there is no LAW to Protect Men- Why?

Will Our LAW Makers ever change the LAW 304B (dowry death) to 304C (Sowry Death) and 498A (Dowry harassment to wife) to 498B (Sowry harrasement by wife)?

Our Proposal :

If you really want the LAWS not to be misused left, right and center; if you want the laws 498A/DV act to change to prevent their misuse: "Vote for any Party but not to Anti-Men Politicians.

or

Be ready to watch Rape statistics doubling in next two years and becoming yet another extortion, blackmailing and easy money earning business for all Advocates, Policemen and greedy women.

Summary of our Recommendations:

We Request that you meet your MP/MLA/Ministers and demand:

1)    Make Rape Law/498A/DV act/CRPC125/Proposed IRBM- Gender Neutral as in other countries across the globe
2)    Relationship cheating/ending cases should not be allowed to be converted into rape cases which drain the scarce resources from genuine rape cases.
3)    Those filing/alleging false complaints of Rape cases should be severely punished, so that genuine cases like ‘Nirbhaya, get justice.
4)    Introduce the much required police reforms to increase conviction rates of rape cases
5)    Introduce the much required judicial reforms for speedier justice and to increase conviction rates of rape cases.

·        All references to “Man” or “Woman” must be replaced with the word “Person” or “Whosoever”
·        All references to the words “His” or “Her” to be must be replaced with the word “His or Her”
·        All references to the words “He” or “She” must be replaced with the word “He or She”
·        All references to the words ‘Husband” or “Wife” must be replaced with the word “Spouse”

Live-in-relationship or marriage disputes should not be included in the Sexual Assault as the same is already covered under Domestic Violence act.

Danger for Future Children & Men:

Justice Verma Committee had seen only one side of the coin with biased view. The committee give a big lecture of International law and Justice system, but failed to identify the real problem and totally remained blind to the suffering Men and children face at the hands of a "Rapist women". They also completely ignored to take into account cases of "False/Fabricated Rape".

The final punch:

Indian Women say: Murder any man and demand immunity under IPC 100 saying “He was trying to rape me”. When they do they thank #justiceverma

We had repeatedly requested and given all the examples suffering of Indian husbands and demanded all Gender Biased LAWS should immediately to be made gender neutral rather than assuming that women never lie and all men are born Criminals. "MAN/WOMAN" word to be replaced by word "PERSON" and word wife/husband to be replaced with the word "SPOUSE".

Despite our efforts, it fell on deaf ears of Government. In return the Ex-WCD minister shamelessly said: It’s the turn of Indian men to suffer, as women have suffered for long”. This is like saying Muslim Kings had destroyed lots of temple, so let demolish all Mosques in India.

·         Don’t trust Your Men, trust Condom, and this statement is given to reduce the incidence of AIDS. How can people ignore the fact that AIDS spreads by having sex with multiple partners and condoms can be used for multiple sex partners. We term married couples as single partners and encourage trust in them. 

·         A Diwali Gift to Indian women. (Within two weeks, four women were send behind bars under first DV act case in Pune and one elderly woman had to leave her own house since her daughter-in-law walked into her house with her all friends and parents.

There is another option: Vote for congress and ensure more and more suffering takes place. Not only congress, all other political parties will consider increasing the suffering of Husbands and their family members. Such husbands and their families cannot ensure defeat or reduction in vote share of such parties, so let them create more and more anti-husband, anti-family, anti-child and anti-men biased and lopsided laws in this country.


Choice is yours; you must remember “The crying baby gets the milk”. 

Anti-Men government has converted the Indian Criminal Justice system as a whole sale, free money earning business though Legal Extortion from Husbands and their families.

Vote for any party, but not to Anti-Men Politicians/MPs. By doing this you will give a clear message that anti-husband, anti-men, anti-family and anti-child laws and policies will no more be tolerated by Indian citizens.


Save Family Foundation, Men Right Associations along with more than 40 NGOs all over India request you to Send the "Anti-Men-MP" Name in Comment section with reason. We will publish the final list of all such MPs after review with all 40 NGO heads.

If any MP feels he/she is not Anti-Men they can give their justification and explain what they have done with our Proposals.


Election 2014: Vote for any party, but not to Anti-Men MP.




Posted by at 13 comments:
Family problem, Help men, Men Life Style, Men NGO , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)