Friday, 30 November 2012

Supreme Court fumes at arrests on 66A, but what about 498A arrest?

''Do you know what is difference between 66A and 498A? SC earlier termed misuse of 498A as Legal terrorism , but government had not taken any action. So first 498A to be scraped. Make a Google search 498A, who do not know the same.66A At least you need some evidence, 498A you do not need any evidence, only verbal aligation is sufficient to term any tom/dick/harry criminal , let he 3-years old child or 92 yrs old women , let he stay near by your home or stay in Uk or Us or Pakistan.All LAW the arrest should be stopped on the basis of compliant , let you prove your aligation and punish them or hang them, what is the problem? why to arrest some one only on the basis of compliant? Scrab all such law which allow police to arrest any one on the basis of compliant , let the same is false fabricated or true.''

The bottom line is :

Act 66A to register a Man/women need to be write some think which can be assumed offensive, but for 498A to register or arrest some one there is no need to write any think, whatever a wives writes  assumed to be True and the Husbands , his mother , sisters, small child all can be arrested , irrespective their age, location of stay in the name of relative.
Act 66A can be misused against you , but it can't be misused against your father, mothers, sisters, brothers or child, but 498A can be misused against all your relative as mentioned above.

Several time several person bring it , to the Notice of Supreme court and supreme court them self at least 4- times given Judgments about the misuse of 498A and government every time prefer to sleep with the Justification misuse of law is not a ground to amend the law.

Result the misuse of LAW spade like Cancer in society and as Supreme court never interfere to LAW making process, our LAW makers even pass the LAW without any debate as per their wish and common men suffered.

Now as we cant expect any remidey from the Goverment , the Supreme court must review all the LAW where the complint can be registered with assumption and arrest can be possible must be termed nul and Void , let the goverment go back to thier calss room and rewrite the law and stop making duplication of law.

Supreme court must put guidelines and it is time to act as they had given enough chance to govement but they are silent on the ground of misuse of law in this country :

1. A person can't be punished twice for the same offense , so if any law made with duplication to be termed as nul and void.
2. Any law which allow registration of compliant on assumption should be  Bailable only. Let the assumption proved in court and then Arrest them , if required for Investigation .
3. When any case it had proved beyond reasonable dought the compliant came to court in unclean hand and abuse the process of LAW to gain his own other interest, they must be punished by default at any stage of cases.
4. More and more admissible of technology like voice recording, mobile cal details, video recording, any documentary evidence to be consider as evidence than some verbal allegations or witness statements as prima face evidence.
5. Stop misuse of constitution 15(3) in the name of positive discrimination allow any section to do the crime and get Scot free. Law should be gender neutral and crime based instead of any case, religion or sex.


As i already said earlier whole world will make fun of our criminal justice system, where we can't book a real criminal , but can arrest any Tom/Dick/Marry on some assumption based criminal law as the same is Non-bailable.

Join SIF Team to Stop this legal terrorism of India and demand to replace the word Husband/wife to Spouse to all marriage related LAW or policy like all over world follow instead of making assumption that all wives born in Raja Harish Chandra family ( never lie) and all husbands born in Criminal family.

We wonder Whose life is in More Danger in India : Men or Women

  • Crime Bure data 2005 : Married Men Sucide : 52k vs Married Women Sucide 28K.Still there is no LAW to Protect Men why?

  • 2006 Crime Bure Data : Married Men Sucide:55452 vs. Married Women Sucide:29869.

  • 2007 Crime Bure Data : Married Men Sucide:57593 vs. Married Women Sucide:30064.

  • Will Our LAW Maker change the LAW 304B( dowry death) to 304C( Sowry Death) and 498A ( harassment to wife) to 498B ( Sowry harassment by wife)

  • Details of Dowry Law Cases for the year 2007 (Source - NCRB)

    S. No.Description2007%age

    1No. of Person Arrested under (498A +304B)*215733100%

    2Child- Under 18 Years4570.21%

    3Senior Citizen-Above 60 Years67643%


    5No of Persons arrested under 304B*2819313%

    6No of persons arrested under 498A18754087%

    7No of persons chargesheet16504077%

    8No of persons arrested but not chargesheeted88574%

    9Under investigation41836

    10No of persons under trial * in 498A and 304B IPC750736

    11No of persons who have completed the trial (498A + 304B)10474549%

    No of persons completed trial only in 304B16816

    No of persons who have completed trial only in 498A87929

    12No of persons convicted under 498A and 304B1882718%

    13No of persons convicted under only 304B558033%

    14No of persons convicted only in 498A**1324715%

    15No of persons whose case acquitted / discharged only in 498A7468285%

    16Only 498A case of living women court found guilty after trail ( 87-85)%

    17No of persons whose cases have been compounded or withdrawn137396%

    % of Person found not guilty vs Arrest in 498A on average

    *Total no of persons under arrest including those in previous year

    ** Person convicted under 304B are also convicted under 498A

    hence, those convicted only in 498A is 12-13

    Hightlights : 

    1.  94% of the people arrested were found not guilty (pre & post trial).

    2.  85% found not guilty after the completion of the trial - but these 85% were also arrested without any investigation. Maximum convection in 498A in case of 304B( 18827 trial), where the person allready spend more than 1 year Jail, but proved their innocence in 304B, but convected in 498A by defult to neturilise the Jail term.

    Source :

    Wednesday, 28 November 2012

    Boycott Aamir khan movie to Stop Abuse of Men!

    It won't surprise me if it comes as a surprise to you about the title of the Blog.  But it is true. 

    Men's Right Activists to boycott Aamir's Talaash - YouTube

    Men's Rights Activists have decided to boycott Aamir Khan's upcoming movie "Talaaash". This boycott is a mark of protest against Aamir Khan's show Satyamev Jayate in which he and the showmakers left no stone unturned in projecting men in bad light. They even went to the extent of showing scripted cases and false statistics of "so-called abuse of women" and hiding true statistics of abuse of men by women and society.

    Aamir Khan indulged in spreading male hatred in the society and contributed to creating an atmosphere averse to distressed and victimized men. Such an atmosphere is a breeding ground for male suicides and Aamir, through his show, just contributed to the growth of such a ground. In short he is directly responsible for the large number of growing suicides by men, especially by married men.
    The question Mr. Aamir Khan never answered , as we witness maximum women abused mentally, physically, sexually in his own Bollywood Film industry , but why he is silent and never shown any guts to clean up the same?  Instead of clean up his own profession industries why he prefer to point fingers to others in scripted show? 
    Some people term him : He is not a Aamir Khan, he is Mr. Farzi Khan!!!

    Here are some of the gory facts about suicides by men and some other issues faced by men.

    As per reports by the Honorable Union Home Ministry, more than 62000 married men are ending their life by committing suicides and Mr. Aamir khan is so blind that he is never able to see that and even justified the slapping of husband on television. He is directly responsible for all husbands' suicide and has promoted the domestic violence against men. 

    He is not a honest man as per me and I will never going to see his movie, which promotes violence and disharmony in society.

    Men’s rights activists to get back at Aamir - Bangalore Mirror,Bangalore Mirror »

    Full News :Men’s rights activists across India have decided to boycott Aamir Khan’s upcoming movie Talaash to protest against the Bollywood actor’s portrayal of men as villains in his TV show Satyameva Jayate. They have launched an SMS and online campaign to urge men not to watch the movie.
    “We are not against this movie but against Aamir Khan who portrayed husbands and men as culprits in Satyameva Jayate,” said Virag Dhulia, a techie and head of gender studies at men’s rights organisation Confidare Research.
    Virag added, “Aamir has given false statistics in his episodes about women’s suicide and domestic violence. According to union home ministry’s data, 62,000 men commit suicide in the country every year. He has not shown the truth about male suicides. He should have also called us and we would have explained the truth. ”
    He alleged that Aamir showed false statistics that one in every two women was a victim of dowry harassment and domestic violence. In Bangalore, the boycott is being spearheaded by organisations like Save Indian Family (SIF). Across India, there are about 10,000 men’s rights activists.


    Our Demands:

    1)     The time has come to establish “Ministry for Men Welfare”. We demand on this day to the Govt of India to establish the “Ministry for Men Welfare”

    2)     All gender biased laws like IPC 498A, DV Act, Proposed Sexual Harassment at Workplace Bill”, Proposed “Marriage Law Bill 2010 (Amendment)”, Adultery Law (IPC 497) should be made Gender Neutral.

    3)     End the "legal terrorism" perpetrated through the misuse of anti-male, anti-family laws. Make IPC 498A bailable and non-congnizable.

    4)     Make provisions to punish those who abuse the judicial process irrespective of gender.

    5)     Confer protection upon men against verbal, emotional, economic, physical and sexual         abuse at home and in the work place.

    6)     Grant joint child custody to both spouses upon dissolution of marriage.

    Other News Link:

    15000 men to boycott all Aamir Khan's films until he apologises!

    Times of India ‎- 1 hour ago
    Men's rights activists give out clarion call to arms against Khan and Talaash. Say they won't rest until he stops demonising men.

    Aamir Khan's films to be boycotted by 15000 families?
    26 minutes ago – Seems like actor/activist Aamir Khan's TV show 'Satyamev Jayate' has compelled several men into boycotting the actor's latest release, 'Talaash'.

    आमिर की 'तलाश' का बॉयकॉट - Navbharat Times »
    Men's Rights Activists to boycott Aamir Khan's Movie Talaash देश भर में कई लोग आमिर से इतने नाराज हैं कि उन्होंने...

    some social organization will reject film talash
    तलाश का बहिष्कार करेंगे सामाजिक संगठन
    मुंबई,[चेतना येरुनकर]। टीवी शो सत्यमेव जयते में महिलाओं पर होने वाली घरेलू हिंसा में सिर्फ ससुराल पक्ष को ही जिम्मेदार ठहराने के विरोध में कई सामाजिक संगठनों ने शो के होस्ट आमिर खान की आने वाली फिल्म तलाश का बहिष्कार करने का फैसला किया है। इन संगठनों के मुताबिक घरेलू हिंसा पर आधारित एपिसोड में कई अहम तथ्यों को भी छुपाया गया था। आइएफएफ (इंडियन फैमली फाउंडेशन), पीआइएफएफ (प्रोटेक्ट इंडियन फैमली फाउंडेशन) और एमएएसएचएएएल (मदर्स एंड सिस्टर्स ऑफ हसबैंड अगेंस्ट अब्यूज ऑफ लॉ) संयुक्त रूप से इस अभियान को आयोजित कर रहे हैं।
    इन संगठनों से मुंबई में जुड़े 10 हजार से ज्यादा पुरुष फिल्म तलाश के बहिष्कार में हिस्सा लेंगे। पीआइएफएफ के सदस्य अमित देशपाडे ने बताया कि सत्यमेव जयते से जुड़े लोगों ने उनका भी साक्षात्कार किया था। इसमें उन्होंने (देशपाडे) बताया था कि किस तरह पुरुष भी घरेलू हिंसा के शिकार हैं, लेकिन इस एपिसोड को प्रसारित नहीं किया गया। देशपाडे के अनुसार, मुद्दा यह नहीं है कि पुरुषों के पक्ष को प्रसारित नहीं किया गया, बल्कि असल बात यह है कि लोगों को पता चलना चाहिए कि महिलाएं किस तरह ऐसी परिस्थितिया पैदा कर देतीं हैं कि पति या ससुराल पक्ष को ऐसा कदम उठाना पड़ता है। देशपाडे ने भारत सरकार के एक आकड़े का ब्योरा देते हुए बताया कि पिछले साल 62 हजार से ज्यादा विवाहित पुरुषों को आत्महत्या के लिए विवश होना पड़ा। (मिड-डे)

    Talaash: zoOm review - Video | The Times of India › Videos
    New20 hours ago
    Men's right activists boycott Aamir Khan's movie 'Talaash'. Men's right activists ... Aamir Khan meets ...

    Thursday, 22 November 2012

    Workplace Harassment bill to be made gender neutral

    This press release is by a coalition of NGOs under the umbrella of the Save Indian Family (SIF).

    All NGOs are non-funded , non-profit NGOs fighting for , Gender Equality, Judicial accountability and balanced laws by creating awareness towards the creation of balanced gender neutral laws so that they are both constitutional and provide justice to all individuals irrespective of gender and sexual orientation. This press release has been sent to highlight the undemocratic law making process of India and expose the fascist nature of the same.

    Workplace Harassment at Workplace Bill is in its current form is unacceptable for a sane and just society because

    1.         Women and Child Ministry(WCD) is desperately trying to sneak in an highly anti male bill by hook or crook. The fact that in India the definition of Sexual assault incorporates males but the definition of sexual harassment refuses to consider men as victims is lunacy compounded with ministerial arrogance at best. When challenged with facts WCD minister states that they will conduct a survey of men later which they did not conduct for the past 15 years, but would pass another draconian anti-male biased bill anyways now?  Is this behavior lunacy and fascism?
    2.         Women and Child Development ministry's internal committee which is expected to conduct the survey is nothing more than a kangaroo court when to come to men's issues will conduct a survey if men are being harassed at the workplace. Why is the WCD  not using the Economic times and Synovate Survey on sexual harassment. Is it because when the data does not back their preconceived agenda then the Kangaroo courts at WCD prefer doing their own surveys. Economic times is India's premier business paper and Synovate is one of the worlds most credible research organization. Below is the link to the news item and survey findings.

    As part of this very credible and extensive research 527 people queried in the survey across seven cities in the country -Bangalore, Chennai, Delhi, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Mumbai and Pune. Below are excerpts from the report to expose how often Males are sexually harassed.
    a) Bangalore: - Half of who agreed that they have been sexually harassed at their workplace said they have been harassed by their female colleagues. Only 32% said that they were harassed by Male colleagues.
    b) Hyderabad: - 29% of said they have been sexually harassed by their female bosses while 48% accused their male bosses.

    c) Delhi: - Numbers are even, with 43% pointing a finger at their female colleagues and an equal number accusing their male colleagues of sexual harassment.

    d)  38% of the respondents agreed that in today's workplaces, even men are as vulnerable to sexual harassment as women. In Hyderabad and Mumbai, 55% of the respondents agreed to this point.

    e) Many of the corporate and PSUs, ET spoke to, agree to this new trend and point out that many male employees do not come out in the open and file complaints because they feel they will not be believed, considering India's social beliefs. They usually seek a transfer to get out of the situation or find a new job.
    From the above facts of the report it can be concluded that Sexual Harassment of Males at Workplace in India is more than that of women since in most cases males do not even file complaints for the fear of Social ridicule.
    3.               Indian industry, media and people alike have overwhelmingly demanded a gender neutral workplace harassment bill and country’s gender laws cannot be determined by a few radical feminist organizations in collusion with the WCD.
    4.               The bill was gender neutral to begin with till the intervention of the WCD and militant   womens NGO’s after which the name of the bill was changed to The Protection of Women from Sexual Harassment at Workplace Bill, 2010.
    5.                  WCD Ministry which stated in 2010 that “Protection of men is also not the mandate of Ministry of WCD” as the justification for not to include men under the ambit of the Sexual harassment bill now states that it will conduct a study on men’s sexual harassment. This clearly points to the severe desperation and the dubious nature of gender lawmaking in India. Removal of WCD of law making is now extremely urgent given the extremely poor credibility of this organization as a gender law making body.
    6.                  Over 35 countries in the world have gender neutral sexual harassment policies, a fact that was presented many times to the WCD only to be dubiously ignored each time.
    7.               It out-rightly violates the essence of article 15 of Indian constitution which prohibits discrimination against any citizen on the grounds of religion and sex. Positive discrimination of women does not men absolving them for punishment for committing offences because of their gender. It has been acknowledged the world over that workplace harassment is gender neutral crime and women have equal or more propensity of committing it. Vishaka judgment nowhere mentioned that women must be absolved of the offence of sexual harassment because they are women.
    8.            The Drafting committee arrogantly ignored overwhelming public opinions asking for the bill to made gender neutral and thereby exposed the fascist law making attitude with which gender laws are drafted in India.
    Demands :

    The coalition of multinational NGOs supporting this press conference strongly opposes the Bill in the present form and demands that the current draft prepared by the WCD be discarded and a fresh draft be created taking into consideration the following points.
    a)      The Sexual Harassment at Workplace Bill must be reviewed and amended immediately to make it Gender Neutral. The word Men/women to be replaced by person or employee.
    b)      No direct money should be given to the person who complaint, all fine should be go to an employee welfare fund. This will reduce the instances of misuse and extortion.
    c)      If the case is found the false/fabricated or filed with an intention derive personal benefit, the person should be fined or sacked summarily without any discretion.
    d)      No outsiders must e allowed into the committees .  No women’s rights NGO;s or NGO working for the cause of women must be allowed to earn revenue from sitting in these committees and converting normal cases into cases sexual harassment.
    e)      The offence to be categorized into to 5 levels and the fine or disciplinary action should be as per level of then offence found in enquiry.
    f)        If any person is not satisfied with the committee’s findings and conclusions they will have the right  approach the court, but no way the employer or enquiry committee member should be involved in that case to defend the accuser.
    Supported By 

    MenSeekJustice USA, Save Family Foundation Delhi, All India Men's Welfare Association, Indian Affiliate Chapter of Association for International Men's Rights Activism and Welfare