Showing posts with label misuse of dowry law.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label misuse of dowry law.. Show all posts

Wednesday, 9 July 2014

SC:No abuse of arrests under anti-dowry law, time to make 498A bailable


The Committee fears that failure to do so might leave no option except to dilute the law by making the same non-cognizable and bailable. In this context, the Committee recommends certain additional measures as contained in the succeeding paragraphs.




No Dowry arrests till magistrate's nod: SC , why such order made ? Look at the Graph , one hand the arrest of people is increasing in 498a , but after long trail Court found more than 85% people are not guilty. 


From the supreme court July,2014 judgment , it had proved beyond reasonable dought the government and police had failed to check the misuse of 498a and so the time had came to make the same bailable , demand Save Family Foundation and their associated organizations , as from the past experience , we witness such Judgments never followed by Police or by Government.
If we go through the NCRB data of 2013 recently released , the arrest had further incresed from 1.97L to 2.2 L , where as it was expected the same will be reduced as per new provision of CRPC41.

This is the 5th time Supreme Court had highlighted the need of stop the misuse of Dowry law like #IPC498a , but Government or Police had never taken any corrective actions.
In the last Parliament committee report by Rajya Sabah , it was clearly mentioned if the misuse of 498A does not reduced they have no option but to make it bailable.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday said women were increasingly using the anti-dowry law to harass in-laws and restrained police from mechanically arresting the husband and his relatives on mere lodging of a complaint under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
Citing very low conviction rate in such cases, it directed the state governments to instruct police "not to automatically arrest when a case under Section 498A of IPC is registered but to satisfy themselves about the necessity for arrest under the parameters (check list) provided under Section 41 of criminal procedure code".
Section 41 lays down a 9-point check list police to weigh the need to arrest after examining the conduct of the accused, including possibility of his absconding.
Expressing exasperation over rampant misuse of Section 498A, a bench of Justices C K Prasad and P C Ghose said if police arrested the accused, the magistrate should weigh the preliminary evidence against the Section 41 checklist before allowing further detention.
"The magistrate, while authorising detention of the accused shall peruse the report furnished by the police officer in terms of Section 41 and only after recording its satisfaction, the magistrate will authorize detention," the bench said.
It also said that this check-list for arrest and detention would apply to all offences, which are punished with a prison term less than 7 years. Punishment under Section 498A is a maximum of three years but it had been made a cognizable and non-bailable offence, which made grant of bail to the accused a rarity in courts.
But the court singled out the dowry harassment cases as the most abused and misused provision, though the legislature had enacted it with the laudable object to prevent harassment of women in matrimonial homes.

Writing the judgment for the bench, Justice Prasad said there had been a phenomenal increase in dowry harassment cases in India in the last few years. "The fact that Section 498A is a cognizable and non-bailable offence has lent it a dubious place of pride amongst the provisions that are used as weapons rather than shield by disgruntled wives," he said.
"The simplest way to harass is to get the husband and his relatives arrested under this provision. In a quite number of cases, bed-ridden grand-fathers and grand-mothers of the husbands, their sisters living abroad for decades are arrested," he said.
The bench quoted "Crime in India 2012 Statistics" published by National Crime Records Bureau to say that nearly 2 lakh people were arrested in India in 2012 under Section 498-A, which was 9.4% more than in 2011.
"Nearly a quarter of those arrested under this provision in 2012 were women i.e. 47,951 which depicts that others and sisters of the husbands were liberally included in their arrest net. Its share is 6% out of the total persons arrested under the crimes committed under Indian Penal Code. It accounts for 4.5% of total crimes committed under different sections of penal code, more than any other crimes excepting theft and hurt," it said.
"The rate of charge-sheeting in cases under Section 498A is as high as 93.6%, while the conviction rate is only 15%, which is lowest across all heads. As many as 3,72,706 cases are pending trial of which on current estimate, nearly 3,17,000 are likely to result in acquittal," the bench said illustrating the misuse of Section 498A as a tool to harass husband and his relatives.
Describing arrest as a humiliating experience apart from curtailing the freedom, the bench said police have not shed their colonial hangover despite six decades of independence and were still considered "as a tool of harassment, oppression, and surely not considered a friend of public".
The need for caution in exercising the drastic power of arrest had been emphasized time and again by courts but has not yielded results, the court said and tasked the magistrates to check illegal arrests.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1277 OF 2014
date of order: 2 July 2014
LANDMARK JUDGEMENT OF J. CHANDRAMOULI KR. PRASAD ISSUED TODAY
DIRECTION TO POLICE....DON'T JUMP AND ARREST AT DROP OF A HAT....SERVE NOTICE UNDER 41A
Our endeavour in this judgment is to ensure that police  officers do not arrest accused unnecessarily and Magistrate do not authorize detention  casually and mechanically. In order to ensure what we have observed above, we give the following direction:

 (1) All the State Governments to instruct its police officers not to automatically arrest when a case under Section 498-A of the IPC is registered but to satisfy themselves
 about the necessity for arrest under the parameters laid down above flowing from  Section 41, Cr.PC;
(2) All police officers be provided with a check list containing specified sub-clauses
 under Section 41(1)(b)(ii);
(3) The police officer shall forward the check list duly filed and furnish the reasons and materials which necessitated the arrest, while forwarding/producing the accused before the Magistrate for further detention;
(4) The Magistrate while authorising detention of the accused shall peruse the report
 furnished by the police officer in terms aforesaid and only after recording its satisfaction, the Magistrate will authorize detention;
(6) Notice of appearance in terms of Section 41A of Cr.PC be served on the accused  within two weeks from the date of institution of the case, which may be extended by the Superintendent of Police of the District for the reasons to be recorded in writing;
(7) Failure to comply with the directions aforesaid shall apart from rendering the police officers concerned liable for departmental action, they shall also be liable to be punished for contempt of court to be instituted before High Court having territorial jurisdiction.
(8) Authorising detention without recording reasons as aforesaid by the judicial Magistrate concerned shall be liable for departmental action by the appropriate High Court.
We hasten to add that the directions aforesaid shall not only apply to the cases under Section 498-A of the I.P.C. or Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, the case in hand, but also such cases where offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term which may be less than seven years or which may extend to seven years; whether with or without fine.

We direct that a copy of this judgment be forwarded to the Chief Secretaries as also the Director Generals of Police of all the State Governments and the Union Territories and the Registrar General of all the High Courts for onward transmission and ensuring its compliance.


Must watch :


DD NEWS Hindi : http://youtu.be/8_kS_QjzpJ8
DD NEWS English : http://youtu.be/aZCD4wqNch0








Posted by at No comments:
Family problem, Help men, Men Life Style, Men NGO , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, 4 November 2012

Supreme Court quashes rape charges against filmmaker Madhur Bhandarkar


No punishment for Ms. Preeti Jain, for wasting 9 years of government and court resources.. why?

( Link of IBN News)

If Sc want to stop such false/fabricated case, must punish such women, as she is not a "small child"  or "abala Nari"!!

Same type of allegation against Mr. Rahull Gandhi, SC fined 10 Lacks to the petitioner, why she got Scot free for wasting court and other resources 9 years?

Need the amend in rape law , as mutual physical relation can't be termed as rape if one of partner find after wards the relationship does not work out, a lot of women also end the realtiohsip , does that to be termed as Rape?

So, Mr.Jhon Abrham also can file a Rape case against Ms. Bipasha Basu, as she had not married and end the relationship?

Any small child also will say , it is not rape, but our Great Law makers failed to understand the same, result today we witness every day the cry for Rape is increasing by misuse the loophole in the Rape law the physical relation was under consent or without consent.

In the Judgment though Supreme court had Quashed the FIR, but no where they had mentioned any Punishment for those who file such false/fabricated FIR. It is the time Supreme court must start punish such people for making False and Fabricated FIR to give a messages that "Legal Terrorism" also a crime in this country, as government forget about to propose any punishment, they have not ready to even give a small provision of warning to such people, result more and more false/fabricated FIR getting registered every day in and out.

Just read another news where Supreme court fined Rs.10 lacks for making false and Fabricated Rape case against Mr. Rahull Gandhi , but why the same rule do not apply for common people who faced false and fabricated dowry cases?

"In a landmark judgement today, a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India dismissed with heavy cause a false, frivolous and politically motivated petition against Rahul Gandhi. The court found that the petitioner's had abused the process of the court in order to wrongly and deliberately malign and damage the public image and reputation of Gandhi. 16 reasons for abuse of court by the petitioners had been cited by the Supreme Court, including putting forth falsehoods, misstatement of the facts and even filing incorrect affidavits before the Supreme Court," said General Secretary Janardhan Dwivedi.

"Heavy cost of Rs. ten lakh have been imposed against the petitioners by the Supreme Court. There was no illegal detention or rape by Gandhi and the allegations are false, entirely without substance and without an iota of evidence. A CBI investigation into the conspiracy hatched against Gandhi and a CBI investigation against the petitioners is to continue and the CBI is to report to the court within six months, including on the contradictory stand taken by the petitioner Kishore Samrite before the Supreme Court," he added.
The Supreme Court earlier today dismissed a case against Rahul Gandhi, saying 'the allegation is without substance and without an iota of evidence'.

Congress welcomes SC order to dismiss alleged case of rape against Rahul Gandhi

The Supreme Court earlier today dismissed a case against Rahul Gandhi, saying 'the allegation is without substance and without an iota of evidence'.
The apex court, which fined former Samajwadi Party MLA Kishore Samrite Rs. five lakhs, said that Gandhi's reputation and that of his family had been damaged by the lawsuit.

 

Request all to wake up and meet your MP/MLA/Minister and demand :

1. The word "Men/women" should be replaced by the word "Person" immediately. If Women do not rape the Men, means physical relation with out consent of other party, why they afraid to accept the Gender Neutral Rape law?
2. Any Physical relation with promise of marriage or any other benefit should not be termed as Rape, it should resolved as per Fraud/cheating/blackmailing law as per merit of cases.
3. When two adult person living together without marriage the same termed "Live-in-relation" and if any partner want to come out from the same should not be crime, as people have choice to choose live together after marriage or before marriage.
4.Marriage related LAW should be made bailable offense, like all over world have and to be resolved in civil law only. If there is any crime done the same is already covered in IPC by Domestic violence law, attempt to murder law, hurt to injury law, extortion and blackmailing law along with dowry provision act DP3/4.
4.  Such law not only duplication of law , but abuse of natural Justice system of India.Where the women and their family can get whole sale free license to abuse the Mens and do the extortion of money/property in the name of Rape under mutual consent physical realtionship. Why the same should not be termed as crime?
5. By default punishment to misuser should be must when court find the FIR had been registered to hide their own crime or to gain any favor like money/property from other party.

Join SIF Team to Stop this legal terrorism of India and demand to replace the word Husband/wife to Spouse to all marriage related LAW or policy like all over world follow instead of making assumption that all wives born in Raja Harish Chandra family ( never lie) and all husbands born in Criminal family.

N

(Crime Is Crime. Punishment should be irrespective of gender, religion and caste. Let us be honest and fight for truth)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Madhur Bhandarkar: I’m speechless and overwhelmed

The filmmaker says he is relieved after the Supreme Court Monday stayed criminal proceedings against him in a rape charge levelled by actor Preeti Jain

“I am speechless and overwhelmed with the kind of relief I got from the trauma my family and me have been going through from the last eight years,” Bhandarkar told a TV channel after the verdict was announced. While staying the proceedings, an apex court bench headed by Justice HL Dattu issued notice to the Maharashtra government and Jain on Bhandarkar’s plea to quash the case. Bhandarkar had challenged the Bombay High Court order asking him to face trial in the alleged rape case.

“We always said it’s a false case and the case where victim said, ‘Give me the role in 48 hours otherwise I will put a case against you.’ There was no whisper of rape in that whole legal thing. Also, at the same time, she gave notice to another person and said, ‘I am pregnant and you accept the paternity of my child’,” he said.


In July 2004, Jain had lodged a complaint alleging that Bhandarkar had raped her several times between 1999 and 2004 under the pretext of marrying her and casting her as actress in his movies. A Mumbai metropolitan court had, in September last year, found substance in Jain’s complaint, and issued process against Bhandarkar, directing him to face the trial. However, the magistrate’s court in November last year had granted anticipatory bail to the Bollywood filmmaker. “Since then I have been fighting and the police has made a closure report not once but twice saying that it is a false case, as there is no proof. I was still going through this ordeal from so many years. I went to High Court and they said you again go down. Again we wanted to squash the whole matter and that’s the reason we came to the Apex court today and I am glad,” he said.
Bhandarkar says he is fighter and that the trauma never dampened his spirit. “I am the one who believed in fighting. Even in the movie-making also. I received a National Award for Page 3 and Fashion…. My movies have done well at the box office.”
I could not stop crying: Madhur Bhandarkar: HT News

Madhur Bhandarkar’s judgment day seemed to be a scene straight out of one of his films.

“I was standing at a little distance from the place where the proceeding was going on, so I did not hear the judgment clearly. When people started dispersing, my lawyer came up to me and said that the court has quashed the charges. I did not know what to say, how to react, I was shocked … I had become numb and tears rolled down my cheeks,” he told us, describing his emotions as the Supreme Court dropped rape charges against the filmmaker on Monday.
“As everyone was looking at me, I went to an isolated corner and wept for two minutes, which gave me immense relief. My family and I’ve gone through this for more than eight years now,” said Bhandarkar, referring to what he’s had to face ever since starlet Preeti Jain accused him of casting couch.

“I was told my career is finished and I have no way to go, but I decided to deal with it strongly, and the result is for all to see. I made good films, won a National Award, gained respect in the industry, worked with the biggest stars and finally came out victorious,” he said.

A free man now
The Supreme Court on Monday quashed the rape case filed against Madhur Bhandarkar by starlet Preeti Jain eight years ago. Jain alleged that Bhandarkar had raped her 16 times between 1999 and 2004, with a promise to cast her in his films.
Filmmaker Madhur Bhandarkar
The Case Timeline
July 2004: Preeti Jain had lodged a complaint against Madhur Bhandarkar claiming that he had raped her several times between 1999 and 2004 under the pretext of marrying her and casting her as actress in his movies. September 2011: A Mumbai metropolitan court had found substance in Jain's complaint, and issued processes against Bhandarkar, directing him to face the trial.
November 2011: The magistrate court had granted anticipatory bail to the Bollywood filmmaker in the case.
March 2012: The Bombay High Court on Thursday rejected the application of filmmaker Madhur Bhandarkar to stay the process against him in a Mumbai metropolitan court in the Preeti Jain rape case.
Following the Bombay high court’s rejection, Bhandarkar decided to move the Supreme Court seeking relief in the alleged rape case filed by Preeti Jain.
Posted by at No comments:
Family problem, Help men, Men Life Style, Men NGO , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, 2 November 2012

A women hide her first marriage to marry a man, can she File Domestic Violence Act?


Ask any small Child the answer will be "No". Make any opinion pool, a common sense person will say "No"!

But Supreme Court of India need more than 2years time to give the Final decision.

Already LAW commission had advices to make the adultery LAW gender Neutral , still government is sleeping. As per law if a women is not divorced and marry to other man the marriage to be termed as null and void , but in DV act the loop whole they try to manipulate and file domestic violence act to hide their own crime, where as such women should had been punished for cheating and fraud.

But to decide the simple question in a case SC already passed more than two years. Today in SC I witness to observe the argument of Mr. Mahesh Tiwari, a Supreme court Lawyer, make strong argument to dismiss such cases immediately to save the Natural Justice system of India and person can't take advantage of her own wrong doing along with came in court with UN-clean hands.

I thought it is against any natural justice system where a person got cheated and the women done the crime , the Court instead of Punishing her for her wrong doing , accepting a cases in the name of Domestic violence act and harass the man more than 2 years and Sc will do justice to such Husbands who are victim of such cases, but the order not passed and on request the opposite party now Indra Jai Singh will argue the cases, where as she is not involved in this cases since now.

When opposite party unable to give any valid argument divert the issue to the famous anti-male Lawyer Ms. Indra Jai Singh is going to argue in SC in next date with the logic such cases should not be dismissed as that will effect a lot of women, as she drafted the LAW for any women , let she hide her previous marriage 100 times and keep doing so, but she should not be punished.

Let the natural Justice system get killed , let a women do crime, cheat but she should not be punished. Till date Sc had not came under all media trails or the anti-men radical groups pressure as earlier Sc had already clarified :

35. No doubt the view we are taking would exclude many women who have had a live in relationship from the benefit of the DV Act 2005, but then it is not for this Court to legislate or amend the law. Parliament has used the expression `relationship in the nature of marriage’ and not `live in relationship’. The Court in the grab of interpretation cannot change the language of the statute.

Let wait and see who win the Natural Justice System of India or anti-male sentiments with the ideology , a women can't be punished for her any wrong doing in this country and they born in Raja Harish Chandra Family( never lie).

On 21st October 2010, a Supreme Court bench by Justice Markandey Katju and Justice T.S.Thakur ordered that Live-in Partners cannot be equated with legally wedded spouses and a woman in a live-in relationship cannot demand her male partner to maintain her by giving money every month.

Virag Dhulia, India Liaison Officer for National Coalition for Men (NCFM) has made a press statement earlier :
  • The concept of women demanding money from men to maintain their life style is completely unacceptable in this era.
  • Men are not “Economic Slaves” that they have to keep giving money and gifts every month to women, girl friends, Keeps, concubines, part time lovers, sexual partners, mistresses for decades or whole life even after the end of the relationship.
  • Women are no way different than men except few minor physiological differences and they can work to maintain themselves just the way any single man maintains himself.
  • Today, Sexual relationships between men and women are mutual. Only an idiot can assume that in a sexual relationship female is the giver and male is the taker. Law Makers must put an end to this practice of maintenance, alimony, compensations to women just due to some mutual sexual or emotional relationships for short or long periods of time.
  • Society and media must stop encouraging greed and economic parasitism in women. Women are equal to men and women have the freedom and choice to work, earn and maintain their life style.
  • If any child is born out of these sexual relationships, live-in relationships or one night stands, then the child’s proper upbringing is the shared responsibility of both the biological parents.
Today, when many societies in the world are eliminating maintenance/alimony/Palimony to wives and are instead urging women to just work and be financially independent, it is outrageous that our Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaisingh goes on to argue in a non-Government case and demands that a man pay Rs.500 every month to one of his sexual partners for many decades in future just like a “Free ATM Machine”. It appears that 70 year old Indira Jaisingh would like women to lead life as economic parasites.
NCFM hails the Supreme Court judgment, which now corrects many misinterpretations that Domestic Violence Act has created. Incidentally, the domestic violence act was drafted by Indira Jaisingh herself and she made this act to “Demand Money from Men Act”, even when there are separate laws related to maintenance. Nowhere in the world, are Women allowed to demand monthly money indefinitely from partner/spouse, while accusing the partner of domestic violence.
Ravi Kumar (name changed), aged 32, a software Engineer has a part-time lover for last 6 months. Just last week, they had a break up. Will Ravi Kumar have to pay Rs.5000/- per month to his part time lover for rest of his life?
Why Men have to pay money to women? What is the difference between men and women apart from a few physiological differences related to sexual organs? Should these few physiological differences make one a “Free ATM Machine” for the other?
On one hand, we hear daily harangues of “Gender Equality” and on the other hand radical feminists like Indira Jaisingh would like to convert every man into “Economic Slaves” and every woman into “economic parasites”.
The sexual relations between two humans are mutual. How appropriate is it to make one sexual partner maintain and pay to the other like a Slave for decades? It appears the radical feminists like Indira Jaisingh would like to define every sexual relationship between a man and woman as “Marriage” on one hand, while actively promoting live-in relationships in the society on the other hand.
A Live-in relationship or a “one night stand” is not a marriage. It’s absurd if someone mistakes them as marriage. Men must not be forced to pay money indefinitely to women whether it is live-in-relationship or it is a marriage. Its time society stops encouraging economic parasitism and tells women to just work and be financially independent.


Indira Jaisingh was always a male hater. Given a chance, she can also push courts to order men to pay maintenance to their female colleagues at work citing some imaginary office romance. We are heading towards a society where women are independent and men are no longer treated as “Free ATM Machines”. Women in urban and also rural India can just work to maintain themselves. They can become clerks, bus conductors, traffic policewomen, vegetable vendors, soldiers, teachers and they can do almost all jobs that men do and earn their livelihood.

It’s very important to note that in this landmark judgment the Honorable judges have referred to appropriate judgments of courts of United States of America and have told to “Google” for these judgments and terms.
The Judgment says:
In our opinion a `relationship in the nature of marriage’ is akin to a common law marriage. Common law marriages require that although not being formally married:-
(a) The couple must hold themselves out to society as being akin to spouses.
(b) They must be of legal age to marry.
(c) They must be otherwise qualified to enter into a legal marriage, including being unmarried.
(d) They must have voluntarily cohabited and held themselves out to the world as being akin to spouses for a significant period of time.

In our opinion not all live in relationships will amount to a relationship in the nature of marriage to get the benefit of the Domestic Violence Act of 2005. To get such benefit the conditions mentioned by us above must be satisfied, and this has to be proved by evidence. If a man has a `keep’ whom he maintains financially and uses mainly for sexual purpose and/or as a servant it would not, in our opinion, be a relationship in the nature of marriage’.

35. No doubt the view we are taking would exclude many women who have had a live in relationship from the benefit of the DV Act 2005, but then it is not for this Court to legislate or amend the law. Parliament has used the expression `relationship in the nature of marriage’ and not `live in relationship’. The Court in the grab of interpretation cannot change the language of the statute.

Request all honest citizen of India , Join SIF Team to Stop such legal terrorism against Indian men and demand to replace the word "Husband/wife" to "Spouse" and "Men/Women" to "Person"  to all related LAW or policy like all over world follow instead of making assumption that all Women born in Raja Harish Chandra family ( never lie) and all Men born in Criminal family.

PPT to stop the legal terrorism

(Crime Is Crime. Punishment should be irrespective of gender, religion and caste. Let us be honest and fight for truth)

Posted by at 3 comments:
Family problem, Help men, Men Life Style, Men NGO , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, 19 October 2012

Think 10 times Before allow Daughter-in-Law to stay in your Home !




Law makers , #Milord of Supreme court clearly telling Indian Husband & his parents - after marriage if you have given shelter to your Daughter-in-Law in your home, it's you liability to provide her Home for rest of the life - let she herself beat you, abuse you, kill you- but you can't ask her to vacate your home. 

In a country where a Women/Men does not have any right to stay in his/her parental own hard earned property/home without their consent-/just because you born by them - but mere marriage - A women get by default to grab not only Husband hard earned Home - but Husband parents Home Too - but for men forget to get right to stay his wife parent's Home - he is not allowed to stay even if the home he purchased in wife name with his own hard earned money !

Yes that's the Unfair law of India made in the name of  Protection of Women from Domestic Violence i.e. #DVAct , which Indian Husband & his Parents ignored time & again and at the end when any disputes occur - they are loosing their own hard earned purchased home.  



Every day 30 to 40 Delhi Husbands are loosing their Home in protection of Women Domestic Violence Act, 2006. A husband can be thrown out from his own Home, but you can't throw out a Terrorist from their own home, that is called Indian LAW!

The Domestic Violence Act had given the boom to all Lawyer's Business, in Delhi a single lawyers had filed till date more than 60 domestic Violence Act, 2006 against the Indian Husbands. Every day he is filling at least 2 to 3 New case under domestic violence act to throw out the Husband from their own house or ensure the Husband have to pay the rent of his wife , irrespective the wife is right or wrong and for all the process required maximum 90 days activity.

‘Instead of suffering quietly, victims of domestic violence, in the form of Verbal abuse, mental harassment, economical abuse, continuous nagging , relationship cheating ..etc.. should try to look for means to face from such atrocities by face or fighting against it’, said a Indian Husband who himself had been such a victim for 18 years. Indian Husband must take the future Plan seriously , as till date they prefers to live it to their wife's hand only.

After having suffered domestic violence in the hands of his own wife for 18 years just for the sake of his children, Anil Kumar (name changed on request) is today a ‘liberated Men’ in his own rights.Growing up in an urban family, Anil Kumar studied till class XI with Home Science as his optional subject from TG Higher Secondary School, Imphal.



It was in 1977 while he was preparing for appearing in his class XII final examination, he fall in love with his wife and got married to the same lady who is also from urban area.They gave birth to one son and one daughter.However, first child was killed by his wife before she able to take see this world by her Doctor Friends at Kolkata and Anil's cry at bath room , had never noticed by any one , the moment his wife says : "She is not a Child Making Machine and this child she do not want as the same failure of Safety measure Anil used .

Since early childhood, Anil was very efficient in all work and sympathetic of Indian women like millions of Indian Men , though the LAW makers and male hater National Commission of Women ( NCW) think all Indian men by born itself either a Rapist or a Criminal only.

Anil's wife remained most of time away from home and picked up the habit of drinking and spending more time with his new Boss Mr. M K Raiyala , whose wife just end her life due to his desperate love towards his office women staff .The income earned by her was not given for any small support to their family. Most of the money spend on her diamond ring, club party , TIKKLA drink and off course 555 .

Some of his friend do not forget to mention him , that some body builder also seen in their flat , when ever he used to go out of Country for his office Projects.In such a situation, the onus of looking after the family and bringing up their children fell squarely on the shoulders of Anil who took up a 9 to 6 job at Delhi and left the Job of Bangalore as the job demands him to go out of Country frequently.

Despite working , Anil’s wife asked money from his for her sister engagement , mother's club party in the form of high cost Diamond Items and some time Anil' have to Purchase the same by using his Credit card ( still he kept all the bill in his small bag of the office ) , to avoid any unnecessary abuse from his wife in front of thier child.If refused to comply with her demand, Anil would be termed as "Bikahri" , he should not have married a women like her , he had spoiled her life , his mother should teach him before marriage that how to keep happy a Urban Women ..etc. were more than frequent.

And she never forget to mention that in spite of Mr. MK is not her husband, how much care he do for Anil's wife .‘One day, when Anil refused to give the gift to his wife for her his usual demand, she grabbed the knife and say : "I will cut the Hand and will call the 100 and you will be behind the bar . Just think are you ready to give me the gift or not ?"Seeing that Anil's daughter rushed in to save the dispute , between mum and dad."My wife kicked her in the bed's side corner and she started to cry : Please dad give the gift mum want .. please , otherwise she will not stop beat us ."

Anil go to market and purchase the 4th diamond ring for his wife by his credit card.



‘On top of fight in the family, constant fights and domestic violence in the family has induced my daughter to suffer from mental problem. Then one day I decided to send her to a Bording school at Bangalore . Since the day she went to boarding school , never ever came back to home as she prefers to meet me in her friends house at Mumbai in holidays.Instead of visiting her, my wife used to pick up fights and even told her to die, as she used to love her dad a lot.

Her condition improved gradually and able to find a Mr. Right , both got married and went to USA recently. Anil recounted while trying to control his tears at Air port.On one occasion, his son run away from home saying he was fed up with penury of the family and his mother's dirty behavior, as his all friends do not forget to term his mother as a worse than "Whore".

Recounting this incident, Anil said, "After my son did not return home till late night, I went all round looking for him and at last found him laying supine on the dry bed of the river."I held my son close and we both cried’.‘We have spend many nights with empty stomach."I had also spend a lot of Night at Car Back seat instead of bed room .

It was a routine for me after 12.00PM of mid night ."Whenever I tried to say to my office friends , they always blame me and shut my mouth saying I should resign to my fate whether my wife is good or bad."My parents and sister also continuously try to convience Anil that he should not be separated for the sake of the children.

Neither court or society will term him as a responsible father . So he should try to fulfill his wife's demand as much as possible without any objection and one day she will understand her mistake .After having gone through all these harrowing experiences, Anil got the opportunity of attending a programmer of "Commando Training of SIF" organized at Delhi by SIF volunteers .

This particular incident was a turning point in his life.

Anil started having new hope in his life and found new friends and guides who understood his problem.By that time, all are children have also grown up and started earning income.They could ignore the nagging of their Mum and live their life without her nagging.

Today, Anil participates in various Travel tour held in the country as well as abroad with his previous earning , which now he had kept in the Mutual Fund and as last two month he left the job and started his own Travel Business at Bangalore.In recognition of his talent, ITA invites him from time to time to conduct training on crafts and embroidery for the members of various SHGs.

He has also been imparting training on regular basis to the Family members of the NGOs for the welfare of Men in society .A confident looking Anil Kumar said victims of domestic violence should not remain quite and they should lodge complaint to the Police and start use the technology like voice recording, video recording , as Indian Domestic Violence LAW consider that all the Husband are wife beater and all wife are the Victim.

The burden of proof to prove your self innocent onto you , where as your wife's own verbal statement is sufficient to freeze your bank account and thrown from your own house.. yes Indian LAW does not treated like this way with a Hard core "Terrorist " also .


So, A hard core terrorist have better social life than a Indian Husband.

Anti men Domestic Violence Act  has been implemented all over India , so they should not remain quiet and suffering , they must start using the technology , otherwise they are going to be treat like a road Dog as till date we have not find a single Husband Shelter Home.

It is sad ,but that is the reality , Indian husbands have to stay in "Railway Platform" or in "Husband Shelter Home " , in spite of spending all their hard earned money to purchase the Dream Home at city like Bangalore/Delhi/Mumbai or Kolkata .

A terrorist also have the right to stay in their own house or use their own money from their own bank account for their living , but for Indian Husband as per India's Anti-men Domestic Violence Act, he had no right to stay in their own home or spend the their own hard earned money for their own living.



Result every year more than 62000 married man ending their life and all husband killers moving freely in this society as Husband killing is not a crime in India, it is termed as social service by NCW/WCD and their associate partner like CSR, AIWDA, Laywers collective, who are behind to form this anti-men Domestic violence act, where a Man can't file Domestic Violence case against any women of India, let she cut him in 11 or 17 pieces!

This is my Great Indian LAW Makers: A "Terrorist " have better right than an Indian Husband!

Request all honest men/women of India to wake up and demand from your MP/MLA , make the domestic Violence LAW gender Neutral and replace the word Men/women to Person and Husband/wife to Spouse as the pain of a mother or sisters or daughters  is not less when they loss their son, brother or father.

Disclaimer :This is totally writer personnel Views only. You may have different opinion. The name and place changed to protect the Persons Identity.

(Crime Is Crime. Punishment should be irrespective of gender, religion and caste. Let us be honest and fight for truth)


Posted by at 2 comments:
Family problem, Help men, Men Life Style, Men NGO , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, 15 October 2012

Learning to Say ‘No” to your wife illogical Demand!!

Learning to Say ‘No” to your wife illogical Demand!!

Learning to Say ‘No” to your wife illogical Demand!!

Parliament has just passed the Domestic Violence Bill. But the social conditioning and attitudes are different to alter, finds out an Exclusive SIF (Save Indian Family Yahoo Group) survey.

Sushmita and Amit (Names Changed) appeared to be the Ideal Couple. There were “ no issues “ in their relationship , except Amit’s occasional complaint about Sushmita use of abusive language against his parents and sister and some time she will take some money from his money parts without his knowledge . He used to get hurt , but Amit would dismiss it as a once –in –blue-moon behaviors till one day Sushmita kicked his 65 years old mother , when she came to their house for a evening for few hours . Amit was shocked!!!!

Silence and Suffering!!!

“There’s nothing surprising about these behaviors” says a renewed psychiatrist. “This is how things begin “She explains. “Initially he (Amit) doesn’t mind the swearing because he didn’t realize that this was just another form of abuse – She explains. “After all most of us do curse from time to time “She adds.

Then again boy’s who have grown up seeing their families and under stand that a daughter –in –law having a Whole Sale free license to abuse their Mother-in-law and Sister –in –law, as our Government thinks that all our mother and sister are criminal, for them women means only daughter in law, so only 498A, anti dowry law are there, where without any investigation all your relatives will put behind the bar irrespective of the complain is false or true. But in case of Dishonest Daughter-in-law, there is no provision by which you can give a small warning to them.


As a result all husbands believe to continue the relationship despite the violence and abuse, tend to school themselves into thinking that it is accepted behaviors. Indeed for most of the boys in India, abuse is accepted as part and parcel of a relationship – pre or post –marital.

Level of abuse:-

An online yahoo group Survey done at SIF (Save Indian Family) , throw up some interesting results . According to member, 98 % of husband suffers verbal, mental and economical abuse from their wife and in-laws. Only 10 % categorized insulting language by wife as abuse .Then again 90% husband said they were willing to forgive their partners.

Say Supreme Court Lawyer, Mr. Mahesh Tiwari, “Our society is biased . We make our boys more docile and therefore, more prone to verbal and mental as well as Economical abuse. But a girl is never fed on such views. It is because of this attitude that a wife can not take “NO” for an answer, this is where problem begins “

Why take it??

Compulsions – economic, social and emotional. A 38 Years old husband and a victim of abuse by wife confess that he is ready to forgive his partner because he “loves her too much “. A large no of husbands accept that they will continue to a relationship with their abusive partner and will sacrifice their age old parents and sister.

Indian Old Parents and Pregnant Sisters in JAIL?

The question now, in the proposed domestic Violence Bill the word “Verbal “Mental and Economic abuse , really justify and gives the right picture that only women suffers the same , husband never suffer the same ??

Mr. Praveen says , this DV Act will lead India to massive Single parenting System , a lot of Un wanted child will be in our society the way in Us 75 % Child born with out a wed lock , In Ireland only less than 2 % people get married relationship .

Another Step to Kill the Institution of Indian Marriage System - Part -2

On that country, women used to beg to men for a live together, forget a marriage, used to beg for a part time father!!!!

Our government is really concern for our honest women??

When they will understand that killing of Institution of marriage is called a “Legal Terrorism “..

Already Supreme Court of India described regarding the misuse of 498A. This Domestic Violence Bill will totally kill the Institution of Marriage system in India which a lot of outsider country want.

Let wait and watch, when our Government will wake up and do some real women well fare instead of playing this Men vs. Women game.


 Disclimer :This is totally writer personnel Views only. You may have different opinion. The name and place changed to protect the Persons Identity.

Every Men in India are under high risk of #Fakecases at Home, Office, Road due to multiple anti-Men #Unfairlaw - which became Blackmailing/Extortion Tool. To survive or #FightBack knowledge is Key. Law is not any rocket Science. Buy & start Read Law Books Now!



Posted by at 3 comments:
Family problem, Help men, Men Life Style, Men NGO , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, 3 October 2012

Indian Husbands End their life:It Was A Crime That I Was Born As Man ?



“She and her parents asked me to furnish Rs 10 lakh as early as possible. But at that time, I was not in a position to produce the sum. Since I was attached to my son, they prevented me from meeting my son. My wife then made false allegations against me and filed a complaint in the police station under section 498 A. The police without trying to ascertain the truth took me away to the police station. On that day, I died literally. Ever since then I was dying day in and day out for two reasons. One, I was kept away from my son and two; I was harassed by my wife. I was suffering both mentally and physically. It became routine for me to beg for my son. But no one understood me. Finally, I fell at her feet and begged to see my son. But to no avail. I then approached the courts. But they quite simply dragged the case. Everything was mechanical there." - this may be one of a Indian Husband's own confession before end his life had been recorded in his own mobile , the unanswered questions .
Video Link 2
Video Link 3
No. such Video will never be a Breaking News in India as it is from a Man and that also from a Husband!!!

The Husband Killers will move freely in the Society they way more than 64000 husband killers/year are moving freely in this country and every day the same are increasing.


Where as we all can witness the Breaking News in Indian Television as Ms. Fizza tried Suicide or any Women suicide in Mumbai Five Star Hotel also and media trial convert all the cases as Dowry death or Dowry Harassment case without Single evidence, except the Verbal allegations.
Not only on the one hand, the judges/media/society/LAW makers sympathize about only a small verbal allegation "violence against women", make cooked up study reports , on the other hand women's organizations earned a huge money by making each and every "Domestic Dispute" to a Violence or dowry death story and fooled the Judges/media/LAW makers in the very temple of justice itself, but every year more than 56000 married man ending their life , which is 10 times more than terrorist killed in this country , but no one feels the same should be make a concern for this country. 

Seems killing the Husbands to be termed as Social Service in this country and creating a Father less child society is the only solution to reduce all the violence and crime in the society.
In this country a person have right to meet his child even after convicted in Terrorist law, murder law, rape law, but a Husbands do not have any right to meet his child, if his wife do not agree and all the Judges do not forget to treat them as Free ATM machine in the name of child maintenance, but miserably failed to ensure the husband at least get some visiting right of child.
That is the Great LAW of this country and our Judges and LAW makers along with maximum Media Houses believe, Indian wives are 'abala nari" and all born in Raja Harish Chandra Family (never lie) and all the Husbands born in Criminal family.

  •     Do you know who had given the whole sale free licensees to your wife to refuse to visit your own child once in a week at least? – Congress.
  •   Do you know who had given whole sale free License to your wife to beat, abuse, refuse food to your child and you can’t even ask her a single question, as it will be termed as verbal abuse? – Congress.
  •    Do you know if your wife demand 1000 rupees for her kitty party and you give 800, it is a crime by you as per law and who made such law? – Congress.
We asked to all Law makers and even honorable Judges of Supreme court , who one hand they describe the misuse of LAW as "Unleashing of Legal Terrorism" and government should take the necessary step to stop that , but they themselves silently enjoy the suffering of Indian Husbands and failed to make any corrective action or asked a small question to the LAW makers, why more and more duplication of LAW made in this country and violated the Indian Constitutions article 14, 21 and misused the special provision of article 15 by all Political party, specially congress in the name of Caste, religion, weaker sex , women etc but forget  everyone is equal in front of law and a person is innocent till proven guilty, but it does not apply when a wife complain against Husband , the moment a wife will complain, the husband to be treated as Free ATM machine, let the allegations is false or true.

Honorable Supreme court of India along with all LAW makers , still not able to answer : Is the Pain of a Mother or Sister is less or Nil , when they lose their son or brother?

If not then why a wife should not be punished, when the evidence are beyond reasonable doubt the husband end his life due to harassment by wife?

We wonder Whose life is in More Danger in India: Men or Women?

Will Our LAW Maker change the LAW 304B (dowry death) to 304C (Sowry Death) and 498A (harassment to wife) to 498B (Sowry harassment by wife)?

In case when a wife end his life, irrespective of any reason , the husband and all his mother/sisters put behind the bar immediately , but when a Husband end their life, inspite of having the evidence , no one cares or media also do not find the same as news , forget about any Breaking News. We even witness the husbands and all his family members send behind the bar , even when the wife's family falsely claimed the wife is dead, where as the truth is the wife is alive and happily enjoying her life with another man.

Whereas , we have witness in this country , a women sleep with her boyfriend in Mumbai five star Hotel (few month back a Air Hostage women's suicide case) and the moment she suicide , all the News Channel claim the wife had been killed (where as the husband stay in Delhi) and it is to be termed as Dowry Death... wonder , where every suicide of a wife had converted to Dowry death and made more and more laws (as on date more than 6 laws to harass and treat the husbands family as Free ATM machine available in this country).

It is evident, more than 90% Indian Husband totally ignorant about the danger they are in and relax, till the time they hit by those dangerous weapon of Legal Terrorism in the form of one sided law like 498a/DV Act/Crpc125/child custody/adultery/maintenance.

This is called the present Justice system in India and equal right in India, made by congress Government.  

For a wife even adultery also is not a crime (it is a rewarding option and free money earning business for the whole life), but for a man even an allegation of “Name-calling” is crime and not only the man, his mother/sister/age-old father also can be put behind the bar under 498A or DV act.

From the court record it is evident, maximum wives who are well educated, working and healthy to earn themselves rush to the court and want money from the husband, but do not forget to file another criminal case (like 498A DV act), mentioning that their husband ill-treat them for money, but they themselves openly demanding money as a legal extortion and blackmailing in front of Police/Media/Court and that is not a crime in India.  Further to note, if a wife earns the money and husband due to some any reason not able to earn the money, even if he is ill or any other condition, he is not eligible for any maintenance from the working women, irrespective he had earned lacks of rupees and given to his wife earlier. 

So the question arises: Is Indian Husband is a Free ATM Machine for Indian wives?
As per Congress Government the answer is:  Yes, result make more and more duplications of LAW and policy , by violating the basic principal of Justice System and forget every person is equal in front of LAW and a person is innocent till he/she proven to be guilty.

We had repeatedly requested and given all the examples suffering of Indian husbands and demanded all Gender Biased LAW  should immediately to be made crime based instead of any assumption that all women never lie and all the men born as Criminal. "MEN/WOMEN" word to be replaced by word "PER SON" and word wife/husband to be replaced with the word "SPOUSE".

But it all goes in deaf ears of Congress Government.

So, dear Indian Husbands and their family members , you have a great option in your hand , vote for congress and ensure more and more suffering of Indian Husbands , as they all born in criminal family and all Husband killers to be awarded by " Bharat Ratna: , as not only congress all other political party also should  consider increasing the suffering of Husbands and their family members termed in this country as Social service and Indian Husbands and their family members can’t ensure their defeat or reduce their vote share, so make more and more anti-husband, anti-family, anti-child and anti-men biased and lopsided law in this country.

History witness , a Terrorist activity can't give any freedom to any one, it kills only innocent , the same is evidence in India also , in the name of Protection to wife/women or reduce the Domestic violence against women, our LAW Makers made more and more duplications of law, killed the basic foundation of Criminal Justice System and "Unlash open Legal Terrorism", which only kills the innocent and the real objective and freedom still far away and can never be achieved and cry will be continue, Indian women are suffering and need more and more anti-men, anti-family and anti-child law and some are under way in the name of Sexual Harassment law, Child abuse law, every where the basic principal will be do the extortion of money/property from a man and the same will not be termed as crime, as all the women born in this country in Raja Harish Chandra Family ( Never Lie)!!!!!!!!

'It Was A Crime That I Was Born As Man'?
Indian Husbands End their life: (Click for Video live evidence of a Indian Husband ).
Posted by at No comments:
Family problem, Help men, Men Life Style, Men NGO , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)