Supreme court: Make rape laws Gender neutral

Law commission Report clearly suggested to make #RapeLaw by replacing the word Men/Women to person .

Lawmakers totally ignored the same due to pressure from WCD NCW and Women organisations of India !

Result all the Rapist Women are moving freely in our Society. They have no fear of law , first they rape men/boys and if the Men/boys #SpeakUp , such Rapist Women are terming the men/boys are rapist to hide their own Crime.

Stop to be a #Mangina and stop protecting criminal #RapistWomen of India ! Time to make #IPC375 gender neutral by replacing the word Men/Women to person .

Injustice Some where is direct threat of Justice Every where - all must keep in Mind !

• Consensual Sex = Rape & How? - Panel Discussion

Don’t Fool Yourself😕

Via @swarup1972 pic.twitter.com/8GpyjAcjVd

— Anupam Dubey (@iAnupamDubey) July 26, 2020

#CrimeByWomen : A 19 yr boy have been harassed, threatened for #FakeRape cases by A 29 Yrs Women if he refuse to marry ! Boy compliant to Police, but no FIR done. https://t.co/zQrjEBpvME

Law makers @rsprasad @HMOIndia @PMOIndia will never term such women criminal #SpeakUpMen

— SwarupSarkar (@swarup1972) August 2, 2020

#CrimeByWomen : युवती ने कपड़े फाड़कर झूठे आरोप में फंसाने की धमकी दी थीhttps://t.co/pAgUTM9Ms2
जूहिता ने कपड़े फाड़ने और अश्लील हरकत करने का आरोप लगाते हुए एफआईआर दर्ज कराने की धमकी दी। लांछन से परेशान होकर आंनद ने सुसाइड कर लिया। #UnfairLaw like #Rape making Men life Hell !

— SwarupSarkar (@swarup1972) August 6, 2020

#TaslimaNasreen at her Best to spread #MaleHatered in #LockDown

Taslima Nasrin is a Bangladeshi-Swedish writer &  feminist, presently given shelter by Indian Government- never felt ashamed & never got any punishment for her advocacy that a Women deserve to have sex with 72 virgin Men in the earth . After all Women have Special privilege in India ! 

Muslim Women deserve to Sex with 72 Virgin Men in Earth !

Now on the eve of #LockDown due to Corono Virus in India , she came up with her another Tweet to spread extreme #MaleHatered  advocacy. After all how she can let it go the Golden opportunity to defame & demean  Men  ? She feel Lucky that there is no Men in her Home !

If this had been said by any Men that he is Lucky that No Women in his House , he had been termed as ............!!! Mo need to mention !

In a country where the married Men Suicide more than 64000+ every year which are double than married Women , a country where when Men face Domestic Violence in hand of Women, there is no remedy available in the Law, but on mere allegation by women -let it be true/false men had been made Homeless, Jobless , Jailed , but when after years of trial at court he prove his innocence, he had not been compensated for his loss of Life, Dignity or financial loss,

In such a situation, we welcome & hope all Feminist must take inspiration from Women like Taslima Nasreen and prefer to stay alone , than making life miserable of their Men at Home . #LiberateMen from their Provider Role and amend all Laws too. Stop force Men to pay abusive Women into heir life for Life Long .

We feel at least feminist gang should strictly follow the advocacy of Ms. Taslima , so that many Men can be allowed to be Live Alive .

Men have to silently suffer the emotional, economical, verbal & Physical #DomesticViolence at Home, but authority like @UN @UNICEFIndia @WHO totally failed to acknowledge the pain and suffering of men.

#LiberateMen from Domestic Violence at home & #MakeHomeSafe4Men Too !

Save Family Foundation Commando Training Sessions: Who and How - COMMANDO TRAINING

Save Family Foundation Commando Training Sessions: Who and How - COMMANDO TRAINING: COMMANDO TRAINING SESSION NEW DELHI, 13th OCTOBER 2012 NARAYAN DUTT TIWARI BHAWAN #219, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU YOUTH CENTER, DEEN DAYAL ...

PPT to stop the legal terrorism

PPT to stop the legal terrorism

• 1. Supreme Court on 498 A Sushil Kumar Sharma Vs Union of India and Ors (Writ Petition (civil) 141 of 2005) “The object of the provision is prevention of the dowry meance. But as has been rightly contended by the petitioner many instances have come to light where the complaints are not bonafide and have filed with obligue motive. In such cases acquittal of the accused does not in all cases wipe out the ignomy suffered during and prior to trial. Sometimes adverse media coverage adds to the misery. The question, therefore, is what remedial measures can be taken to prevent abuse of the well-intentioned provision. Merely because the provision is constitutional and intra vires, does not give a licence to unscrupulous persons to wreck personal vendetta or unleash harassment. It may, therefore, become necessary for the legislature to find out ways how the makers of frivolous complaints or allegations can be appropriately dealt with. Till then the Courts have to take care of the situation within the existing frame work. As noted the object is to strike at the roots of dowry menace. But by misuse of the provision a new legal terrorism can be unleashed. The provision is intended to be used a shield and not assassins‘ weapon. If cry of "wolf" is made too often as a prank assistance and protection may not be available when the actual "wolf" appears.”

  
  

  Why hasn’t Government acted to prevent misuse even when Supreme Court asked them to ?

• 2. Supreme Court of India Term “Legal Terrorism”• 
• The Supreme Court with a Bench comprising Justices Arijit Pasayat and H K Sema has agreed with petitioner Sushil Kumar Sharma that Section 498A of Indian Penal Code, which seeks to protect women from being harassed for dowry, was being misused through frivolous cases filed by women to trouble their in-laws.
•  By misuse of the provision a new “Legal Terrorism” can be unleashed, says Bench Merely because the provision is declared constitutional, it does not give license to unscrupulous persons to wreak personal vendetta.• 
• Justices Arijit Pasayat and H K Sema added a word of caution, saying, "Merely because the provision is constitutional, it does not give a license to unscrupulous persons to wreck personal vendetta or unleash harassment."• 
• The judges called upon the legislature to refine the Section and "find out ways how frivolous complaints or allegations can be appropriately dealt with".• 
• But till date our Government /legislature have not shown any concern to stop this “Legal Terrorism” is best Known to them.
• 3. Supreme Court of India Term “Legal Terrorism”• 
• "In such cases acquittal of the accused does not wipe out the ignominy suffered during and prior to trial. Sometimes adverse media coverage adds to the misery". Merely because the provision was declared constitutional and intra vires, it did not give license to unscrupulous persons to wreak personal vendetta or unleash harassment, the judges said.• 
• "The object is to strike at the root of dowry menace. But by misuse of the provision a new legal terrorism can be unleashed. The provision is intended to be used as a shield and not an assassins weapon. If [the] cry of "wolf" is made too often as a prank, assistance and protection may not be available when the actual wolf appears", the Bench said.• 
• The investigating agencies could not follow a straitjacket formula in matters of dowry torture, deaths and cruelty.• "
• The role of the investigating agencies and courts is that of a watchdog and not of a bloodhound. It should be their effort to see that an innocent person is not made to suffer on account of unfounded, baseless and malicious allegations," the Bench said.
• 4. Who Are We …
• Victims of Legal Terrorism in India• 
• We are working professionals( IIT/IIM/Engineer/Doctors/MBA/IT Engineers/Media Journalist/Judge/Police all except Politicians) and are were working for family harmony.• 
• We want Domestic Harmony Act , but Government refuse the same.• 
• We want gender Equal Law , men/women to be replace by the word Person and Wife/Husband to be replace by Spouse in all Indian IPC Law.• 
• Till Date no Politicians/Ministers had been arrested in 498A or DV act case, but common people arrested without any investigation and more than 98% face the money extortion the way a Terrorist do with Common people.• 
• When ever any Politician of Ministers accused of 498A or DV act, even women ministers also come out openly to give him Clean Chit.• Why different law for Politicians/Ministers in India? 
•  
• Stop Legal Terrorism and Save your Life 
•  

• Request all to wake up and meet your MP/MLA/Minister and demand :

  1. The word "Men/women" should be replaced by the word "Person" immediately. If Women do not rape the Men, means physical relation with out consent of other party, why they afraid to accept the Gender Neutral Rape law?
  2. Any Physical relation with promise of marriage or any other benefit should not be termed as Rape, it should resolved as per Fraud/cheating/blackmailing law as per merit of cases.
  3. When two adult person living together without marriage the same termed "Live-in-relation" and if any partner want to come out from the same should not be crime, as people have choice to choose live together after marriage or before marriage.
  4.Marriage related LAW should be made bailable offense, like all over world have and to be resolved in civil law only. If there is any crime done the same is already covered in IPC by Domestic violence law, attempt to murder law, hurt to injury law, extortion and blackmailing law along with dowry provision act DP3/4.
  4.  Such law not only duplication of law , but abuse of natural Justice system of India.Where the women and their family can get whole sale free license to abuse the Mens and do the extortion of money/property in the name of Rape under mutual consent physical realtionship. Why the same should not be termed as crime?
  5. By default punishment to misuser should be must when court find the FIR had been registered to hide their own crime or to gain any favor like money/property from other party.

   
•  

When a women rape a man it called Love as per LAW, Society and media..right?

When i read the News article in Times of India : When live-in turns sour, man becomes ‘rapist’: Times of India News.

CHENNAI: Instances of long-time companions turning against their boyfriends, and accusing them of rape, are on the rise. Affairs gone sour, break-ups and failed live-in relationships are being taken to police by women, who charge their ex-boyfriends with rape, police say, conceding that such complaints are being lodged more frequently than before.
"We do try to strike a compromise between the man and woman, who are mostly young, but we are left with no choice if a woman sticks to her stance," a senior police officer said.

Recent examples include an IT company boss who was slapped with rape charges by his former employee, one year after she quit the job. There was also the case of a hearingimpaired man who was booked for rape after he broke up with his long-time companion. She complained to the police that he deserted her after they had lived together virtually as man and wife.
Once an FIR is registered, the prospect of arrest gets real for the man in such cases. "An arrest can ruin his self-esteem , his business and public profile," said former special public prosecutor for human rights court V Kannadasan. "Of course police have no choice but to register a case, but arrest is entirely their discretion and it should be exercised most judiciously," he said, pointing out that a couple's intimacy for a prolonged period should be taken into account by police while probing such cases.
In the recent past, police have registered a case against controversial godman Nithyananda based on allegations made by an exdevotee . It is for the police to unearth the truth, given the fact she had claimed that the godman raped her 45 times. Another incident involves a private company boss, who was arrested on charges of rape. Interestingly, here too, the two complaints from as many ex-employees came more than a year after the alleged rape took place.
In a few of these cases, the alleged perpetrator of the crime and his victim may have shared an emotional or intimate relationship , thus blurring the line between sexual exploitation and a consensual affair.
The social context remains the fact that a large number of young professionals are increasingly living together or close to each other, say police. Sharing a roof or living-in as partners too is common in this age group, they say. But sometimes, such arrangements are brought to an end without mutual consent, leaving the couple bitter.
Treasurer of the Madras High Court Advocate Association T K S Sudha, admits that some women do lodge rape complaints with the motive of exacting revenge after a relationship sours. "The Supreme Court has approved live-in relationships to an extent, as it has held that the girl is entitled to claim maintenance from her live-in partner. But, to allege rape after being in such a relationship is taking the liberty too far. It is abuse,"
CASE HISTORY
Hearing impaired man gets arrested on rape charges after partner accuses him of going back on his promise to marry her A rape case was registered against controversial godman Nithyananda after a devotee claimed that she was raped 45 times Managing director of a private firm was arrested after two rape cases were filed by ex-employees , a year after the incident.

THE FINE PRINT

Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code lays down six circumstances to qualify for a rape. Of this, three are about consent, two about 'misconception' , and one is about the statutory age limit Poilce invoke Section 417 of IPC along with Section 376 (punishment for rape) while a man is arrested for rape. Section 417 deals with punishment for cheating and it prescribes a maximum imprisonment of one year with or without fine IF THE ALLEGED RAPE CONTINUED FOR DAYS OR TOGETHER WEEKS OR , MONTHS AT MOST IT COULD BE A CASE OF CHEATING OR BREACH OF TRUST.

We had witness several cases where a women dump men and go to another men , does on that cases a MAN can cry he had been Raped? The answer is no , then why the same is reversed when a women cry for rape? If dumping your partner is crime, why the same is not crime for women?

The bottom line is :

When a women rape a man it called Love as per LAW, Society and media..right?

 Any small child also can say such law or act is not only unfair , it is a clear injustice to men and to be termed as Blackmailing and extortion by greedy women. When two adult person stay together as per their own wish and after some time the relationship breaks, how the same can be termed as Rape?

But LAW makers prefer to keep Blind eye and promote such injustice against men and if they do not stop such biased view and promote the extortion and legal terrorism in the name of Rape, the false and fabricated Rape cases will only increase and then one more law will be made or NCW/WCD will demand increase the punishment in Rape cases .

First convert every break up as Rape case , then increase the crime against women statistics and then demand another new law , increase the punishment , which our great law makers, Supreme court of India and media often failed to understand .

Consensual sex is not rape: Supreme Court , but Police/Lower court and media never ready to accept the same. and misuse the Rape LAW qs a whole sale free lincence in this country.

Recent Judgement of Delhi Sesson Court , terming that "A man having sex with a women on promise of Marriage and then refuse to be termed as rape" reported in Hindustan times.

This is total violation of Supreme court's earlier Gudie line, which neither the Judge or Hindustan time's Jurnalsit who had reported the News , seems aware:

Consensual sex is not rape: Supreme Court

New Delhi, August 29: A man having sex with a girl after obtaining her consent on the promise of a marriage does not necessarily constitute rape even if he retracts on his pledge, the Supreme Court has ruled.

Such retraction by the accused would amount to rape only if the consent was obtained by coercion or threat, a bench of Justices Arijit Pasayat and D K Jain said while upholding an appeal filed by the accused Pradeep Kumar. The apex court maintained that there was no straitjacket formula for determining whether consent given by the girl was voluntary or given under a misconception of fact as it has to be decided on the basis of the circumstances and surrounding factors which led to the alleged consensual sex.
"The court must consider the evidence before it and the surrounding circumstances before reaching a conclusion, because each case has its own peculiar facts which may have a bearing on the question whether the consent was voluntary or was given under a misconception of fact," the apex court observed.

Pradeep Kumar had filed the appeal against the orders of a sessions court and the Patna High Court which rejected his plea for discharge from a case filed against him by a girl who got him booked under IPC Sections 376 IPC (rape) and 406 (breach of trust) for "retracting" on his promise to marry her.

In his appeal before the apex court, the accused claimed that the victim had consensual sex with him and hence the charge of rape or breach of trust cannot be entertained.

( Refer the Supreme court Judgement Appeal (crl.) 1086 of 2007)

---

But Delhi season court had failed to consider why she had been in a sexual relationship before marriage, is it her birth right to term any Tom/Dick or harry a rapist, if the guy do not find she is suitable for his rest of the life?

When she is so concern about protection of virginity, why they go for sexual relationship before marriage?

If at all a Promise of Marriage made , maximum it can be termed as Cheating or Breach of trust, but how it became a Rape?

Further we witness a number of cases the girls( so called lovers) are dumping the boys also and do not marry after college, specially in those cases where the girls get better earning man in their life after ward to fulfill their dream of lavish lifestyle through marriage, so do those boys have any right in the law to file Rape case against their cheater Girls friends?

One hand as per Domestic Violence LAW, our LAW makers and all radical women activists already made live-in-relationship women had got all the legal rights ( even a one night relationship) , among the college we witness maximum young boys and girls are having per-marriage sex in the name of women and sexual liberation, strong avocation by WCD ministers that in the School itself we should teach sex education among the child to stop the AIDS, continuous provocation that do not marry a unknown man, first know each other form all the aspects, as marriage is a eye opener and love is blind.. etc, on the other hand terming some one a Rapist only on the basis that the guy had refused to marry a girl after consensual sex , how much justified , only our LAW makers can answer.

One hand a women will be raped by a gang of people and then will be killed and police/media will continue to search to find the real rapist years to years , on the other hand so called living greedy women will file false Rape cases , if they feel the man do not find suitable her for a real life partner due any reasons.

So , in this country as a women you have all the wholesale free lincence to term any man a "Rapist" , let you rape the him, that does not matter!!!!

When a women rape a man it called Love as per LAW, Society and media..right?

Wonder why Rape law should not be made Gender Equal, if we fell women do not rape the man and instead of hide behind a gender biased law , let the so called radical women forces come forward to prove that they do not rape the man.

Can they have such honesty or it is White lie to protect their own crime and refuse to accept the LAW commissions long back recommendations to make the Rape LAW Gender Equal.

We know if the rape law made gender equal , every year at least 5 times more women will be convected than man, as per present definition of Rape and if we have Judges like this , who think sex with the promise of marriage is Rape in this country.

Request all honest Media guys, Law makers and common citizen, wake up and make the law sensible, logical and gender neutral instead of any assumption that all women born in "Raja Harish Chandra family" and all men born in criminal family. 

or

Be ready tomorrow WCD/NCW will demand no punishment for women in murder case, drink and drive cases as the same crime done by few women, what a logic!!

Men too are victims of sexual harassment: Times of India

Photo by Mark : Stop Abuse of Men at Work Place

Men too are victims of sexual harassment: Times of India

With the government contemplating whether men should be included in the Sexual Harassment at Workplace Bill, we wonder why they were left out in the first place.

If this law does not made Gender Neutral, it will destroy any men in profession let it be Police, lawyers, doctors, Judges, Politicians also, as per law any women can visit your office for her own will and then file a case and demand money in the name of Harassment!!!!!

Protection of Men from Workplace Harassment: Join Today


In spite of more than 35+ country all over the world have Gender neutral law, Indian government's LAW minister failed to make the same law Gender Neutral and all our request/data submitted to Parliament
committee had been ignored. So, it is we man have to give the moral and helping hand to such men , so that they should not silently leave the job or end their file in Suicide or suffer injustice.

Join hand together to rise your voice against such one sided biased law proposed by WCD.

MAKE GENDER NETURAL WORK PLACE HARRASEMENT LAW

MAKE GENDER NEUTRAL WORK PLACE HARASSMENT LAW (LIKE ALL OVER WORLD
MORE THAN 35 COUNTRY HAVE)

Following will happen if the PRESENT ANTI-MEN Bill is passed in its
current form:

1)      Men loose minimum 25 TO 50% monthly salary and the same will go to women employee if man refuses to give leave, promotion, and increment to a women employee.
2)      Any Women can file the case and sit at home and company have to pay her salary irrespective she is right or wrong.
3)      If the case is false, the same can’t be disclosed to any one even the same information will not be available through RTI also.
4)      Any outside women can visit your work place for meeting or promotion of their sales items like credit card/holiday trips and if you refuse to purchase the same they can file case against you for blackmailing.
5)      If you are a customer and you have any problem, you can’t question to company if the same attended by women, she can file a case against you and you have to pay her the money as compensation along with
criminal case.
6)      If any women harassed to other women or men, they can’t file any complaint against the women, only a women can file complaint against men.
7)      Company can’t ask resign from any Women employee, if her performance is not up to mark, she will file the complaint and will get salary without coming to office.
8)      Women NGO heads will get a Job in all Company irrespective of her qualification or integrity in the name of “Sexual Harassment Committee members”.

Injustice some where is direct thread of Justice every where. Stop this extortion/blackmailing Law in the name of WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT BILL otherwise it will be misused like left/right and
center.

MEET YOUR MP AND DEMAND:

1.      The word Men/women to be replaced by person or employee.
2.      No direct money should be given to the person who complaint, all fine should be go to some employee welfare fund.
3.      If found the same filed false/fabricated or to get some personnel benefit, the person should be fined or sacked. Presently it is may, the word may should change to Shall.
4.      The committee members should not be outsider, they should be the company HR/admin personnel.
5.      The offense to be cauterized to 5 levels and the fine or disciplinary action should be as per level of offense found in inquiry.
6.      If any person is not satisfied to inquiry committee finding, can approach the court, but no way the employer or inquiry committee member should be involved in the case.

Women and Child Development ministry's internal committee which is nothing more than a kangaroo court when to come to men's issues will conduct a survey if men are being harassed at the workplace.  Why are
they not using the Economic times and Synovate Survey. Economic times is India's premier business paper and Synovate is one of the worlds most credible research organization.

When the data is not in their favor then the Kangaroo courts at WCD prefer doing their own surveys.

• Survey findings Economic Times News .

As part of this very credible and extensive research 527 people queried in the survey across seven cities in the country -Bangalore, Chennai, Delhi, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Mumbai and Pune.

Below are excerpts from the report to expose how often Males are sexually harassed.

a) Bangalore: - Half of who agreed that they have been sexually harassed at their workplace said they have been harassed by their female colleagues. Only 32% said that they were harassed by Male colleagues.

b) Hyderabad: - 29% of said they have been sexually harassed by their female bosses while 48% accused their male bosses.

c) Delhi: - Numbers are even, with 43% pointing a finger at their female colleagues and an equal number accusing their male colleagues of sexual harassment.

d) 38% of the respondents agreed that in today’s workplaces, even men are as vulnerable to sexual harassment as women. In Hyderabad and Mumbai, 55% of the respondents agreed to this point.

e) Many of the corporate and PSUs, ET spoke to, agree to this new trend and point out that many male employees do not come out in the open and file complaints because they feel they will not be believed, considering India’s social beliefs. They usually seek a transfer to get out of the situation or find a new job.

From the above facts of the report it can be concluded that Sexual Harassment of Males at Workplace in India is more than that of women since in most cases males do not even file complaints for the fear of Social ridicule.

Result the increasing rate of Suicide of working Men( refer crime bure data working men suicide vs working women suicide) and as there is no Men well fare ministry, WCD refuse to accept the hard reality that the work place harassment bill all over more than 44 country is Gender Neutral.

If LAW minister can't convince to WCD, there is no point to make such law at all , which will promote the misuse Left, right and center and workplace will became a gender war and extortion of money hub without
any work result the workplace harmony will be totally destroyed.

If women do not harasses men, why WCD afraid to make the same Gender Neutral? If women do not harasses the men they will not be Punished, very simple.

Workplace harassment is a crime and under no Constitution which any gives power to give any protection any specific gender/caste/religion to do the crime and not get punished. Stop misuse the Indian Constitution in the name of Positive discrimination.

If this law does not make gender Neutral, tomorrow WCD will demand, remove women from Murder Law, remove Women from Drink & drive law.

Will our LAW minister will agree to that also on the same logic of Positive discrimination theory?

News Must read :

Mens rights activists upset over Workplace Harassment Bill!- Times of India