Showing posts with label Workplace Harassment.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Workplace Harassment.. Show all posts

Monday, 3 August 2015

Facing False IPC498A, rape, dowry, molestation, DV case, how to fight back?



Before start you must know the basic of criminal justice system:

          Cases WIN or lost depend on ground contradictory statements, creating doubt against any allegations, abuse the process of LAW or for coming to court with unclean hands is the major key factor.

           Go through all FIR/ Complaint/ Charge sheet or any other cases documents, then note down the contradictory statements, hiding of Important Fact.

           On Facts of cases, prepare the questions for complainant and witness for Cross.
           Bring out the fact in court and also try to find reference Judgments of SC or HC like your cases.

           Use of CrPC 340 should not be missed at any stage, let judge dismiss it or keep pending for trial to end.

           90% preparation should be from your side, as you know the fact better than your lawyers.

           Avoid any contradictory statements or allegations without evidence from your side.

           Highlight all the good things you have done for her, like purchase of any items / home / FD / education / photos of outings etc.

           Identify the motive of her filling such cases, MOST IMPORTANT.


  • Never ever try to close the Complaint at Police station:

We have witness many cases, people think such cases can be closed by police station itself by compromise or a simple apology etc. The fact such cases are non-compoundable and non-cognizable and as per Complaint if the allegations levelled revel cognizable offence, police have no option but to register the FIR, let the allegation fake or you have evidence to prove it wrong.

So, don’t waste money and time to stop conversion of complaint to FIR. Your job starts once FIR get registered , then try to close the FIR by providing any evidence you have to Investigation officer to file final closer reports to court. Wherever without FIR police had tried to close the complaint, the accused had faced much trouble. Any type of compromise dead or apology etc will be used to file second time Complaint with stronger prima face evidence and none will be able to save you.


  • No self confession at Police stations or in Court:


Anything you say WILL be used against you, what you do not consider a "confession" police or social workers are likely to. Never try to explain why you have done this for her to help or come out form depression, learn from Sooraj Panchali case. It will be used against you as prima face evidence to build the case and the same act done for  good intention or bad intention up to court to decide and you will be dragged in court room years after years.

When we go through various judgments of Supreme Court of India witness more than 90% cases  where ever some men failed to prove their innocence, it is due to the self confession by accused was the prime reason for his convection.

We have seen many thousands of cases that would never have seen a courtroom had it not been for the things the accused said that were twisted into being a confession.

REMAIN SILENT! You HAVE that right, USE IT!

Yes police will try their best to play good and bad cope to get your confession by hook or crook, but always remember those are temporary torture, mentally prepare to face it.

  • Demand advocate to be present

If you demand an advocate, and you cannot afford one, police can’t continue to question you if you want one appointed free for you. If they persist they risk contaminating a case.

They have to produce you in court and that time seeks again an advocate and brings the truth of their physical torture if any.

You have to understand the level of Trouble you are going to face.

  • Finding the right advocate or LAW firm to represent you

There are many good advocates available, but that does not grantee hiring a good advocate will save you. There is nothing called good or bad advocate, it is how you and he make the relationship and understand each other’s requirement, start form fees to your capacity to pay.

Always avoid negotiating with advocate about their fees, asking their fees and if you can afford it go with it or avoid. It’s always better to fix fees per date than one time amount, it is a win win situation for both keeping in mind our Indian judiciary’s back log of cases.

First you have to understand the meaning of advocate. In legal terms he is representative of you. Why you need a representative for you? The reason is you have faced such cases first time, but an advocate witnesses such cases many times, so some experience he had which you don’t have. 

Maximum cases we witness people run behind costly advocates and end up with a situation, instead the advocate represent him, he became representative of advocate.

It is often best to find the best advocate reference from the various court judgements where they had past experience of success.


If at all you don’t find a suitable advocate for your case as per your budget, it is better to fight as party –in-person than try to find a re-negotiated advocate.



It’s time to start update your own knowledge. You might have seen in movies, how an honest advocate brings all the evidences or witness in court room and in last minute turn the table.

But in reality it does not happen. 90% hard work, like collecting evidence, protecting your defence, you have to do it. Your advocate job to make the same in legal language and his job is only 10%. To understand various Law and judgements one need maximum 3 months for an average IQ guy, as it is not a rocket science.

The more you will start reading various SC or HC judgements, you will find more loop hole in your FIR or in her statements.

You can select any one as advocate to represent you, but should never rely solely on anyone, not even yourself. You must start to meet others who also facing such cases learn from their success and failure story. You can't help to defend yourself from a place of ignorance. You'll need to educate yourself on the subject area of the allegations you are facing.

When your advocate tells you that you need to do "X" it is important that you understand why you need to do that. Lots of time can be wasted trying to explain every step to you, and often the effort spent "selling" you on the need to do "X" or "Y" becomes so tiresome that anyone will decide to stop trying.

You need to understand why the things are necessary and not just be a cash cow and a passenger along for the ride. The best results come from a fully involved advocate and client relationship.
Many advocates don't like that, but the successful ones demand it. Beware and don't snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory.


  • Build your resources, may have to look for some Loan

No one wants to hear that this kind of case will be expensive and takes long time. Actually such cases had been filed against you keeping in mind that only. On the fear of arrest, on the fear of social reputation, on the fear of cases will drag years after years, you will surrender to their illegal demands.

If you had faced such cases, as your earlier brothers also done the same mistakes by surrendering in front them, it’s called Legal Terrorism. So, first you have to mentally prepare what ever happened to me already happened, but will not allow her to bite another innocent and for that if required will sell my own body parts also , but will not surrender in blackmailing or extortion.

Then only you will able to take right steps.


  • You have to begin by realizing the level of trouble you are in

Understand the consequences if you underestimate the legal ramifications for your life lead you to make the wrong decisions. Unfortunately most people go into some level of denial and minimize the trouble they are in. As a consequence they fail to do things they must and find themselves in much deeper legal troubles than they started out with. 

For an example, say child sexual abuse allegations or sexual abuse to wife had been added during a divorce case, and you feel they mean little as how can such allegations to be taken seriously by court or your advocate says "such cases does not stand in court" . So you prefer to take such allegations lightly and ignore to concentrate to break their allegations and then find in no man’s land during trial. If you had reacted properly the eventual cost would be a fraction of what it will cost if things get out of hand.


You must start learning various technological product like , CCTV, SPY Cameras , good recording device for Mobile Phone , latest voice recording software , as during the process of all investigation, you may en-countered many threat , blackmailing , extortion demand . Don't loose the opportunity to capture the same always keep safe the original .

  • Avoid running away from court date:

We know maximum people hate to attend the court date, but the fact is as per criminal law, as an accused you are suppose to be present in court date. If you unable to present an exemption must be filed. But maximum cases we witness, when judge call, neither accused or advocate present and opposite party take un-due advantages to issue NBW and again you have to run form pillar to post and loose all advantages of your hard earned earlier bail or AB.


  • Start working with witness list:

You will need to start working on lit of witness. Include the people's name, addresses, phone information, as well as their employment and a brief biography. And also a brief bit on what they can testify to. Many time seen the witness you think is not important became key witness in your case.

You know best your case, so first identify truthfulness of witness and concentrate to bring truth in court room via cross exemptions. So, don’t limit yourself on one or two witness, use bad witnesses as well as ones on your side all, bring them in court notice. Let us decide who is important and who isn't. Witnesses are key evidence in any criminal cases fate. Always insist first all evidence of all wittness completed then only cross should start . Otherwise depend on your cross other wittness may add more aligation. If judge do not agree file application under CRPC 242/3 , let judge reject it at least it will help in higher court the evidence was after thought.

  • Prepare for Final arguments:


          Depending on FIR, Charge sheet, Witness statements, you have made the question of cross exemptions and your aim to get maximum contradictory statements, creating doubt against any allegations, abuse the process of LAW or for coming to court with unclean hands.

          Summaries all and Present all the same, preferably as written statements.

          Enclose some SC or HC judgements if any, same like your cases.

          Prepare yourself to fight Up to Sc than surrender against any Legal Terrorism.


90% is your mental battle and 10% is legal battle in all such cases. Start networking with people in advance than crying foul after wards and keep blaming, advocates and judges as biased.


All are suppose to be behave as biased ( the way you also was till you got hit by any false cases in India )  as law itself is biased on assumption that a women never lie or  a women never cheat .





Tuesday, 15 July 2014

Stop Abuse of Boys from WCD's malicious proposal


Crime done by Child is not UN-common , but after all consideration , UN had made rule instead of punish them like adult , such child to be reformed as their development of Brain is still under construction. Many child get abused , ill treated , forced to Child labor , their child hood had been taken away by our society , we failed to provide a basic home to many home less child . 
Cores of Fund , shelter home provided under WCD , but the same never taken seriously that if a Child had done any crime , means it is our society failed to reform him or able to provide the necessary education to them and such child instead of punishment to be send to reform home or school and bring them in flow of Normal society .

Photo by Mark : Stop de-humanizing Men or Boys for their Gender


Now for well fare of child in India also have a ministry , but it is clubbed with Women and termed as WCD ( Women and child department).
We had witness several time , WCD failed to do the real welfare of child and now the most in-human act they are doing is abuse the boys by various fake cases.

A 40 year old women and 17 year old boy have some physical relation , the whole world term the women as rapist and send her to jail, but in India , it is the Boy termed as rapist , which WCD failed to understand. 


Save Family Foundation and their associated organizations had cautioned about the loop hole in anti-rape law, where the consented relationship had been converted to rape cases and increased the rape statistic in police record. At a time when various court asked:  “Tougher rape law leading to increase in false cases?”
When Gujarat CM termed the poor uneducated boys as Rejected mall , as a WCD minister she had preferred to keep her silence , proved beyond reasonable dought, she had no concern for child in the form of boys in this country and totally doing injustice to lacks of Homeless Child's of India.
Unfortunately the same facts and figures could not get into public and before that came another burning issue pertaining to Juvenile crime.
Minister for Women and Child Development Maneka Gandhi advocating treating juveniles accused of heinous crimes like rape on par with adult offenders.
She said according to the police, 50 per cent of all sexual crimes were committed by "16-year-olds who know the Juvenile Justice Act so they can do it." But now for premeditated murder, rape, if we bring them into the purview of the adult world, then it will scare them.
We have already filed so many objections stating the facts and figures of gross misuse and utter neglect of the WCD ministry in addressing them. However, when it has become eminent to the world that that the sections of law which were formulated for the protection of women have been grossly misused, the WCD has got no options to turmoil the brains of society addressing with new agenda and in short “ABUSE OF BOYS”.

WCD minister came out with a proposal by citing a totally malicious, unclean hand, hiding the real fact of statistics without applying any fair thought, behind such statistics. Does WCD unaware that any consented relationship with a girl’s vs Boys aged below 18 years , by default the boy had termed as rapist and the same added in rape cases statistics ?
We would bring to notice of WCD : When any girl or women have any physical relationship with a boy aged less than 18years, do you term the same as rape?
If the answer is no, then why a Boy had been termed as rapist by you, when he had any physical relationship with any girl aged less than 18 years?
WCD citing the report of Police that more than 40 % cases boys are involved, without any court order, how can she term all cases as true? Why she ignored the same police report when it had says more than 90% cases are mutual consent only, which latter converted to rape?

Instead of dealing with the figures of misuse and work on it, they are preparing another platform of misuse. This can be clarified with the simple example.
A boy and a girl fall in love in a co-ed school. They had some intimate sharing with the consent of each other.  Later the girl’s parents file a rape case on the boy. This innocent who has no count of IPC and CrPC is rigorously punished. Is it justified? Even when the police figures clarify the same as 90% of cases of juvenile rape are actually a consented sex, Maneka Gandhi is hurried to get Juvenile law amended.
So, the formula used by all radical groups along with WCD, first create a loop-sided Rape LAW by which massive false/fabricated cases can be filed to increase the statistics crime against women and then again demand to amend further law saying crime is increasing, crime is increasing.
The cycle continues and the crime against women never gets reduced and their demand/funds never get stopped.
We have severe objections and lay it down as below:
  • If Juvenile Law can be changed, change age for passport, driving license and bank account, etc. If a child can be termed as adult, as he has committed a crime which he doesn’t know, then in general a juvenile can be termed adult for all these.
  • If juvenile can be termed adult, why shall he not given voting rights at early age.
  • Age for consensual sex, drinking, etc to be reduced.
  • Age for marriage and conceiving is to be reduced as the juvenile is matured enough.
  • There have been numerous cases where boys have been used as a toy for pleasure by some nymphomaniac, however no such protection of child exists. Such acts should also be considered heinous and such women termed rapist.
  • WCD ministry has failed to curb the menace of child labor which has risen by 6% in a year for boys and is at its Apex, but is ready to turn a juvenile an adult bypassing all the biology doctors’ study for years. This clearly indicates their soiled intentions and unclean hands towards ABUSE OF BOYS.
  • Before implementing the amendment, it must be ensured that juveniles know all the 511 sections of IPC and 484 sections of CrPC, which Meneka Gandhi assumes that a juvenile has knowledge before committing such a heinous crime.
With all the above, it is quite eminent that the WCD ministry is not capable of handling child issues in a gender balanced thought process and thus the Women and Child Development shall break into two different entities.
The Supreme Court and various high courts have often stressed on the need to check the rampant misuse of such gender biased laws, basis this Maneka Gandhi has come up with new solutions of breaking families and promoting misuse and targeting boys only with hiding the real fact to hide their own failure to provide a safe, healthy education to poor Childs.
In a country the Child labor is banned, but every year 6% increase of boys in child labour, but WCD had not taken any corrective action, on the other hand the Sex between girls vs Boys below 18 years not banned, but WCD want to term boys rapist for a consented sex also.

Save Family Foundation, along with all their associated NGO all over India, once again demand to Prime minister to immediately stop such malicious act by WCD by separating the Child ministry from present set up as they had no concern for poor, uneducated boys or we should be ready to pay a heavy price as such step will increase only heinous crime in society, as we witness earlier also.



Wednesday, 9 July 2014

SC:No abuse of arrests under anti-dowry law, time to make 498A bailable


The Committee fears that failure to do so might leave no option except to dilute the law by making the same non-cognizable and bailable. In this context, the Committee recommends certain additional measures as contained in the succeeding paragraphs.




No Dowry arrests till magistrate's nod: SC , why such order made ? Look at the Graph , one hand the arrest of people is increasing in 498a , but after long trail Court found more than 85% people are not guilty. 




From the supreme court July,2014 judgment , it had proved beyond reasonable dought the government and police had failed to check the misuse of 498a and so the time had came to make the same bailable , demand Save Family Foundation and their associated organizations , as from the past experience , we witness such Judgments never followed by Police or by Government.
If we go through the NCRB data of 2013 recently released , the arrest had further incresed from 1.97L to 2.2 L , where as it was expected the same will be reduced as per new provision of CRPC41.

This is the 5th time Supreme Court had highlighted the need of stop the misuse of Dowry law like #IPC498a , but Government or Police had never taken any corrective actions.
In the last Parliament committee report by Rajya Sabah , it was clearly mentioned if the misuse of 498A does not reduced they have no option but to make it bailable.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday said women were increasingly using the anti-dowry law to harass in-laws and restrained police from mechanically arresting the husband and his relatives on mere lodging of a complaint under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
Citing very low conviction rate in such cases, it directed the state governments to instruct police "not to automatically arrest when a case under Section 498A of IPC is registered but to satisfy themselves about the necessity for arrest under the parameters (check list) provided under Section 41 of criminal procedure code".
Section 41 lays down a 9-point check list police to weigh the need to arrest after examining the conduct of the accused, including possibility of his absconding.
Expressing exasperation over rampant misuse of Section 498A, a bench of Justices C K Prasad and P C Ghose said if police arrested the accused, the magistrate should weigh the preliminary evidence against the Section 41 checklist before allowing further detention.
"The magistrate, while authorising detention of the accused shall peruse the report furnished by the police officer in terms of Section 41 and only after recording its satisfaction, the magistrate will authorize detention," the bench said.
It also said that this check-list for arrest and detention would apply to all offences, which are punished with a prison term less than 7 years. Punishment under Section 498A is a maximum of three years but it had been made a cognizable and non-bailable offence, which made grant of bail to the accused a rarity in courts.
But the court singled out the dowry harassment cases as the most abused and misused provision, though the legislature had enacted it with the laudable object to prevent harassment of women in matrimonial homes.

Writing the judgment for the bench, Justice Prasad said there had been a phenomenal increase in dowry harassment cases in India in the last few years. "The fact that Section 498A is a cognizable and non-bailable offence has lent it a dubious place of pride amongst the provisions that are used as weapons rather than shield by disgruntled wives," he said.
"The simplest way to harass is to get the husband and his relatives arrested under this provision. In a quite number of cases, bed-ridden grand-fathers and grand-mothers of the husbands, their sisters living abroad for decades are arrested," he said.
The bench quoted "Crime in India 2012 Statistics" published by National Crime Records Bureau to say that nearly 2 lakh people were arrested in India in 2012 under Section 498-A, which was 9.4% more than in 2011.
"Nearly a quarter of those arrested under this provision in 2012 were women i.e. 47,951 which depicts that others and sisters of the husbands were liberally included in their arrest net. Its share is 6% out of the total persons arrested under the crimes committed under Indian Penal Code. It accounts for 4.5% of total crimes committed under different sections of penal code, more than any other crimes excepting theft and hurt," it said.
"The rate of charge-sheeting in cases under Section 498A is as high as 93.6%, while the conviction rate is only 15%, which is lowest across all heads. As many as 3,72,706 cases are pending trial of which on current estimate, nearly 3,17,000 are likely to result in acquittal," the bench said illustrating the misuse of Section 498A as a tool to harass husband and his relatives.
Describing arrest as a humiliating experience apart from curtailing the freedom, the bench said police have not shed their colonial hangover despite six decades of independence and were still considered "as a tool of harassment, oppression, and surely not considered a friend of public".
The need for caution in exercising the drastic power of arrest had been emphasized time and again by courts but has not yielded results, the court said and tasked the magistrates to check illegal arrests.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1277 OF 2014
date of order: 2 July 2014
LANDMARK JUDGEMENT OF J. CHANDRAMOULI KR. PRASAD ISSUED TODAY
DIRECTION TO POLICE....DON'T JUMP AND ARREST AT DROP OF A HAT....SERVE NOTICE UNDER 41A
Our endeavour in this judgment is to ensure that police  officers do not arrest accused unnecessarily and Magistrate do not authorize detention  casually and mechanically. In order to ensure what we have observed above, we give the following direction:

 (1) All the State Governments to instruct its police officers not to automatically arrest when a case under Section 498-A of the IPC is registered but to satisfy themselves
 about the necessity for arrest under the parameters laid down above flowing from  Section 41, Cr.PC;
(2) All police officers be provided with a check list containing specified sub-clauses
 under Section 41(1)(b)(ii);
(3) The police officer shall forward the check list duly filed and furnish the reasons and materials which necessitated the arrest, while forwarding/producing the accused before the Magistrate for further detention;
(4) The Magistrate while authorising detention of the accused shall peruse the report
 furnished by the police officer in terms aforesaid and only after recording its satisfaction, the Magistrate will authorize detention;
(6) Notice of appearance in terms of Section 41A of Cr.PC be served on the accused  within two weeks from the date of institution of the case, which may be extended by the Superintendent of Police of the District for the reasons to be recorded in writing;
(7) Failure to comply with the directions aforesaid shall apart from rendering the police officers concerned liable for departmental action, they shall also be liable to be punished for contempt of court to be instituted before High Court having territorial jurisdiction.
(8) Authorising detention without recording reasons as aforesaid by the judicial Magistrate concerned shall be liable for departmental action by the appropriate High Court.
We hasten to add that the directions aforesaid shall not only apply to the cases under Section 498-A of the I.P.C. or Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, the case in hand, but also such cases where offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term which may be less than seven years or which may extend to seven years; whether with or without fine.

We direct that a copy of this judgment be forwarded to the Chief Secretaries as also the Director Generals of Police of all the State Governments and the Union Territories and the Registrar General of all the High Courts for onward transmission and ensuring its compliance.


Must watch :


DD NEWS Hindi : http://youtu.be/8_kS_QjzpJ8
DD NEWS English : http://youtu.be/aZCD4wqNch0








Sunday, 13 April 2014

Why you should vote My PARTY NOTA than Modi’s BJP?




Modi sold tea in train I sold chocolates in train! 

Modi feel pain for beti(daughters) I also feel pain when a beti (daughters) loose her son or brother!

Modi helped Gujarat to develop I also helped Gujarat to develop by working there and give special discounts to Surat/Ahmadabad textile mills!

Modi is fighting in two seats; I am fighting in all 545 Seats.

But Modi do not include SC order to check misuse of law in manifesto but my manifesto obey SC order to check misuse of Law!

( In this issue if you Vote for SP I don't mind as in their Manifesto also mention they will Check Misuse of LAW)

Modi do not have any concern as per NCRB data every year in India more than 65000 husband suicide , but I have concern for them and provide a special Men help line : 0-8882-498-498.

A Husband cut in 17 pieces in Gujarat by his wife and her friends , Modi do not feel pain or demand hang to death punishment for such wives, but I feel the pain even sitting at Delhi and protest against such crime and demand hang to death punishment. 

Modi's Party sitting in Opposition  join hands in parliament with Congress to pass Anti-male , Husband killer Law without any punishment to misuser of law , But I demand strong punishment and strict misuse LAW for every Strict LAW .

So this time no vote for Modi’s BJP party vote for my party NOTA!

Even my Surname also SARKAR, but Modi does not have Surname Sarkar.

This time NOTA SARKAR.

Stop Abuse of Men.