But unfortunately our Law Makers , Judiciary, Media and Feminist Gang never consider the same as Crime.
Result all the Rapist Women are moving freely in our Society. They have no fear of law , first they rape men/boys and if the Men/boys #SpeakUp , such Rapist Women are terming the men/boys are rapist to hide their own Crime.
Don’t Fool Yourself๐
— Anupam Dubey (@iAnupamDubey) July 26, 2020
Via @swarup1972 pic.twitter.com/8GpyjAcjVd
#CrimeByWomen : A 19 yr boy have been harassed, threatened for #FakeRape cases by A 29 Yrs Women if he refuse to marry ! Boy compliant to Police, but no FIR done. https://t.co/zQrjEBpvME
— SwarupSarkar (@swarup1972) August 2, 2020
Law makers @rsprasad @HMOIndia @PMOIndia will never term such women criminal #SpeakUpMen
#CrimeByWomen : เคฏुเคตเคคी เคจे เคเคชเคก़े เคซाเคก़เคเคฐ เคूเค े เคเคฐोเคช เคฎें เคซंเคธाเคจे เคी เคงเคฎเคी เคฆी เคฅीhttps://t.co/pAgUTM9Ms2
— SwarupSarkar (@swarup1972) August 6, 2020
เคूเคนिเคคा เคจे เคเคชเคก़े เคซाเคก़เคจे เคเคฐ เค เคถ्เคฒीเคฒ เคนเคฐเคเคค เคเคฐเคจे เคा เคเคฐोเคช เคฒเคाเคคे เคนुเค เคเคซเคเคเคเคฐ เคฆเคฐ्เค เคเคฐाเคจे เคी เคงเคฎเคी เคฆी। เคฒांเคเคจ เคธे เคชเคฐेเคถाเคจ เคนोเคเคฐ เคंเคจเคฆ เคจे เคธुเคธाเคเคก เคเคฐ เคฒिเคฏा। #UnfairLaw like #Rape making Men life Hell !
The foundation of the Movie, about a fake allegation of rape that is foisted on a hapless young man, beggars belief. But this is Incredible India, where fact trumps fiction every single day and the media throws up levels of bizarreness that are beyond the imagination of the average screenwriter.
The pradhan and his cohorts Bhima (Ravi Kishen) and a charlatan priest (Sanjay Mishra) dream up with the preposterous idea of framing Arjun for the alleged rape of the pradhan’s prized female buffalo, which is fresh from winning a recent bovine fashion show and hence known as Miss Tanakpur. Om Puri’s greasy-palmed police officer is happy to let the farce make its way into the courtroom, and even the judge plays along instead of consigning the case into the rubbish bin.
Anil, a property dealer from West Delhi, was last week honorably acquitted by a Delhi court in a rape case lodged by his sister-in-law following a long-pending monetary dispute.
Even as the court acquitted him honorably, Anil says his “honor can never be restored”. “My life and my face in the society can never be the same. Only I know how I am alive. Accusation of rape is a punishment in itself, even if false,” he says.
This and many similar cases show a vast shift from the times when it was a common ground that no women would make false allegation of rape given the social stigma attached to it.
Maximum time we get reply, it’s a women issue, and we can’t do that as a male feminist or female.
It’s not that only women abuse the rape law, for every fake cases filed by women, at least 2 or 3 men who are victim of Misandric Virus ( male hatred) Mindset cheers behind the seen.
When a person is accused to rape to a Buffolo can go through all such trauma and suffering, one can understand when women #CryRape, what extend a man has to suffer.
History witness, when somewhere Injustice happened, threat of Justice occurred everywhere.
#CrimeByWomen : เคฏुเคตเคคी เคจे เคเคชเคก़े เคซाเคก़เคเคฐ เคूเค े เคเคฐोเคช เคฎें เคซंเคธाเคจे เคी เคงเคฎเคी เคฆी เคฅीhttps://t.co/pAgUTM9Ms2
— SwarupSarkar (@swarup1972) August 6, 2020
เคूเคนिเคคा เคจे เคเคชเคก़े เคซाเคก़เคจे เคเคฐ เค เคถ्เคฒीเคฒ เคนเคฐเคเคค เคเคฐเคจे เคा เคเคฐोเคช เคฒเคाเคคे เคนुเค เคเคซเคเคเคเคฐ เคฆเคฐ्เค เคเคฐाเคจे เคी เคงเคฎเคी เคฆी। เคฒांเคเคจ เคธे เคชเคฐेเคถाเคจ เคนोเคเคฐ เคंเคจเคฆ เคจे เคธुเคธाเคเคก เคเคฐ เคฒिเคฏा। #UnfairLaw like #Rape making Men life Hell !
Indiatimes has in its possession the formal judgment (dated 28 February 2015) pronounced in the 2012 ‘Amity rape’ incident. The incident dates back to 2012, when a girl had accused two boys of gang-raping her. 3 years later, the incident received a conclusion – the boys were free to go. During this time, the boys served 1 year in prison, and 2 years of regular criminal proceedings.
After 3 years of being labeled criminals by society, friends and family, Prashant and Milind, 2 Amity University boys have been acquitted by a trial court of allegations of raping a fellow student. The court pulled up Delhi Police and the investigating officer (IO) for carrying out a biased probe, cooking up evidence and hiding crucial information in the case which proved the innocence of the accused.
According to the police, the alleged incident took place on the afternoon of June 14, 2012. Prashant called the woman, who was his batch-mate, to Vasant Vihar to watch a movie. He was accused of giving her an alcoholic drink, driving her to a secluded place in Paschim Vihar in his Honda City car, calling his friend Milind to the spot and gang-raping her.
At face value, you can see that the testimony the girl gave was pretty damning – there was the dramatic allegation – intoxication and violently forcing a girl to submit to rape.
And just her statement was enough. Just her testimony led to investigating officers framing charges on the two boys. She also claimed that she had been treated so badly that she "had developed suicidal tendencies". Her statements were treated with even more delicacy particularly in the wake of gruesome attacks on women in the last 3 years after the infamous Nirbhaya incident.
And then her testimony fell apart.
There was no DNA evidence.
The girl was admitted at New Delhi's AIIMS Hospital for 14 days after the rape, during which NO vaginal examination was conducted. She also said that the boys who gang-raped her had washed her clean to get rid of evidence. However, there was no residual DNA on her clothes. She also made accusations of “unnatural sex” – but evidence didn’t prove it.
And what about the scene of the crime?
Police didn't actually investigate the scene of the crime, the place where she claimed she was raped.
And the violence against her?
If they had explored the place, they MIGHT have found traces of her blood that spilled when she cut her leg there. When there were no cut marks on her body, she claimed that she was beaten with an ice bag.
Which was also false - as Advocate Prashant Mendiretta, counsel for the accused, informed us. How can this ice not have melted in 42 degree temperature, in a room that had no fridge, air conditioning or even a fan? These were the conditions she described of the room she was supposedly raped in.
Psychological trauma?
The court also rejected the prosecution's claim that the woman was so traumatised that she initially did not report the rape but only spoke about assault. Relying on hospital records and other evidence, the court said the woman was in her senses when she was examined on June 15, 2012, a day after the alleged incident. The court also observed that it appeared that the woman, after the incident, faked psychiatric disorders and was therefore referred a senior psychiatrist at AIIMS. The woman spoke about being gang-raped by the duo only on June 28, 2012, 14 days after the incident.
The evidence that sealed her fate and saved the boys,
Cellphone records obtained show that during the time when she was allegedly being assaulted and raped, there were multiple calls made to her phone.
She spoke 1000 seconds: with her friend
She spoke 300 seconds: with her father
She spoke 400 seconds: with her mother
This is among 50-60 calls she made/received from her number.
And yet, not once did anyone raise alarm.
The cellphone tower position logs indicated movement of the cellphone. How can someone get raped, and have someone make/receive 50-60 calls from their phone?
The judge urged the police chief to frame guidelines making it mandatory for IOs to bring to the notice of the accused all evidence in a case, including those that favour the accused. "She (the IO) has betrayed the trust reposed by the public upon a police official. The aim of the police officer should be to collect evidence and not to create it...(She) committed breach of professional standards by ignoring, disregarding and withholding material evidence which pointed to the innocence of the accused," the court noted while delivering the verdict.
With inputs from Sana Shakil, TNN
Any law which allow registration of compliant on assumption should be Bailable only. Let the assumption proved in court and then Arrest them , if required for Investigation .
Recently in SIF we are getting many complaints that even age old ladies are filling molestation cases against young boys secondary to trivial disputes such as Parking of cars or bikes.
But a big surprise awaited him the next day morning. He received a call from local Police station, that he and his 22 year old brother were accused of Molesting the neighbor who was a 45 year old woman.
Mr. Arun is not alone, every day in SIF we witness such cases and find that young guys are totally ignorant and unaware of the dangers of #IPC354. This law was created in a way, that any women irrespective of her age can send any man behind bars by a simple verbal allegation.
 |
| Photo Courtesy by Mark |
Although the woman was at fault, she started to be abusive towards him. In order to seek justice Mr Gupta contacted Police at 100. Police officer took both of them to the local Police Station.
Ironically the court gave bail to that woman straightaway despite the Video evidence to support #IPC182.
A mere allegation by a 45 years old women, without any evidence, sent two young men behind bars for 9 days. On the other hand, despite video evidence of false molestation charges, a woman got bail in 2 minutes.
Any FIR/complaint on the basis of Verbal statement of women which leads to #IPC354 must be made bailable.
 |
| Photo Courtesy by Mark |
"The Law Commission in one of its Report dated March, 2000 had recommended that laws relating to rape (Sec 375 IPC) be made gender neutral.
Will our Lawmaker ever take the moral responsibility and courage to replace the words “Men/women” by the word “Person” and replace words “husband/wife” by the word “Spouse”?
Or
Do we continue to suffer and support the ideology/wisdom and action planning of radical Feminist groups “It is the turn to suffer of men ”.
