First make #RefusalofSex a Criminal offence then talk about #MaritalRape

Lie , lie and Lie , that’s how radical Feminist group and media fool the Indian by Playing the Victim-hood Card smartly.

• A wrong done by wives refuse to have sex without any justified reason and blackmailing Husbands , radical feminist groups termed as marital rape to hide their own wrong doing.

#RefusalofSex and #MaritalRape ( Forced Sex) both had been considered as Mental harrasement by #MiLord of SC and is an Ground for Divorce.

But radical activists want to make criminal offence only #MaritalRape but not the #RefusalofSex in marriage, which is totally #Unfair.

They say in India Husband have right to have forced or violent sex with wife and there is no relief to wives. This is a Blind lie. The truth is in India a Women or wife when rape a Men or Husband the same not termed as crime in Indian LAW.

Would request all read the law Like Dv Act ( Domestic Violence act) , where it had clearly mentioned in case of any sexual assault or Violence even a Name calling is offence . The women can get relief under DV act as protection order, compensations, and residence right. If the Men violate the protection order, he will be jailed immediately.

In addition to that, if women face sexual violence, she can seek relief under CRPC125; she can seek Divorce and alimony.

In addition under 498A also the men is Punished for doing such act.

So, there are 4 special laws exclusive for Women as a relief in case they face any sexual violence or assaults in marriage.

On the other hand , When a woman rapes (sex without mutual consent) our Indian society and law colors the act with terms like loving or affectionate. Sadly some women consider such acts as their birth right over men. If a man tries to fight back or resist or even dreams of speaking the truth, he himself is labeled as rapist instead of being considered a Victim of rape.

So the bottom line is in India , a Women have right to rape not only her Husband to any Men and the same is not crime as per LAW.

Another lie spared in NDTV show by a Feminist that Law commission had recommended to make #MaritalRape is a criminal offense.

But she had not mentioned that:

"The Law Commission in one of its Report dated March, 2000 had recommended that laws relating to rape (Sec 375 IPC) be made gender neutral.

But the recommendation was not accepted.  Why?
 

Will our Lawmaker ever take the moral responsibility and courage to replace the words “Men/women” by the word “Person” and replace words “husband/wife” by the word “Spouse”?

The Question asked why the #MaritalRape should not be termed as other Rape cases and the answer is:

1.     Where the women are not married with Men she had not given any consent to have sex as Legal Obligations.

2.     Other Women can’t seek relief under special 4 LAW which is available for a Wife.

3.     Other Women can’t restrict the man to have sex or re-marry to other women as per Constitutional Right 21 give Live and Liberty. 

4.     The present Rape Law are not gender Neutral, so every Possibility the Victim is not the women, the Victim is men.

5.     In married relation there are Consensual sex also , so you can’t determine the sex was consensual sex or forced sex by DNA or other forensic test.

6.     Most important the evidence act of present Rape law does not seek any medical exemption as prim face evidence. So , every Consual sex also can be termed as rape. 

7. Most important its not only in marriage relationship , any relationship you are in the form of marriage or love or live-in , terming your partner rapist is not only wrong, it is cheating and fraud.

Marriage LAW we have section 9 RCR - restitution of conjugal rights it is your obligations to have sex with your partner and it is the Legal right provided by Law in return it restrict your choice to have sex outside women. Even Supreme court of India mentioned in several Judgments #RefusalofSex without any medical reason is wrong and spouse have right to seek divorce.

As per our survey more than 98% cases Husband had been refused to have sex with their wife without any medical or Justified reason months after months , but feminist say , men have relief under such situation to seek for Divorce. 

Ohhh what logic, a wrong done by wife the solution is Divorce, then why same type relief a wife can’t seek like Divorce than crying foul I had been raped?

Also those feminist had not told you as soon as a Husband will seek Divorce on ground wife refuse to have sex, immediately he along with all his other family members will be termed as criminal under 498A, Dv act. Multiple litigation for maintenance will be filed as interim maintenance under CRP125, Section24 and section25.

So, a wrong done by wife but it is Husband have to pay the price and run from Pillar to Post to get Divorce ? 

So, if you really want to reduce the forced sex or violent sex the first step should be term #RefusalofSex as a Criminal offence, as during marriage it is your legal obligation and consent to have sex and you violate it. Then only there will be Domestic harmony.

No, No, now Feminist will come out with logic it is my body my Choice, I had get married to you does not mean you have right to use my body as Commodity.

100% agree with you all male hatred, but you will you buy the same logic if given by Men? If he refused to have sex with wife, will not you term him Impotent, he had done fraud, Cheating, have relationship to other women and drag him in multiple criminal cases?

Most important , if you buy any costly Diamond set or Beauty Parlor Cost by his hard earned money , why She also should not be send behind the bar under as crime under extortion or Robbery?

 

• So, next time before fall under feminist lie, must understand:

 

1.     In India if a Women face #MaritalRape she can seek relief under DV Act/CRPC125/Divorce/Section24/Section25/498A. But if she raped her Husband her Husband can’t seek any relief or Protection from her.

2. Refuse to have sex by Husband to wife without any justified reason is a offense in India as per Domestic Violence act , but the same not considered as any offense when does by wife.

3.     In India men does not have right to rape wife , if he does have to pay heavy price, but Women have all right to rape any men or her own Husband the same not crime.

3.     During marriage You have given consent to have sex with your spouse and it is your Legal Obligations as in returned you had ended his/her Choice of to have sex with other men/women outside wedlock.

5.     Terming forced Sex or violent sex as per with stranger Sex is nothing but unfair and cheating. 

6. If you are in any relationship in the name of marriage or live-in or love affairs, you can't term your partner a Rapist, first end it than cry foul rape , rape. 

7.     If you believe it is my body my Choice, then stays away from marriage and do not give false promise and obligation of marriage law. No one had put a Gun on your head to get married.

8.     If you use his money without her consent, be ready to go to Jail under extortion and Robbery cases also.

9.     A Husband can't be file rape case against Wife, let she rape you every day and then cut your body in 11 or 17 pieces.

10. A wrong done by wives refuse to have sex without any justified reason and blackmailing Husbands , radical feminist groups termed as marital rape to hide their own wrong doing.

 

 

• So, what is Solution?

 

Read the other LAW of other Country as Whole before compare a appeal to orange,

1.     Rape or Sexual assaults LAW should be Gender Neutral first. There should not be any excuses to support #RapistWomen of India.

2.     The Present relief given under Domestic Violence Law as protection first to be utilized and then see how many cases found true . Let first get the data from Court than depend on per-determined one sided biased study by funded organizations.

3.     To maintain Domestic Harmony the DV act to be made Gender Neutral like other country have.

4.     Abolish special law like 498A, 304B as no other country of the world have such decoration law.

 

The most important before believe unfair demand of #MaritalRape first make #RefusalofSex as criminal offense than only  giving a Lollypop solution to Men of Divorce , which never come without paying heavy price.

 

Related News : 

Making marital rape an offence will lead to false complaints - Deccan Herald

'Making marital rape an offence will lead to false complaints ... Business Standard

 

Refusal of Sex in Marriage : How Many time as Husband You had been refused to have Sex by Your wives without any Justified/Medical reason or in failure 2 purchase of Valuable items 4 her?
P.S. Marriage = Man forced to give up his choice 2 sex with other women Legally, #SpeakUpMan

— SwarupSarkar (@swarup1972) April 10, 2019

66A Scraped what about 498A , 354 and 376 ?

On the eve of SC #Scrap66A , we all welcome the decision and establish that a badly drafted law can only lead to havoc in Society.


There are many such laws like 498A , Molestation ( 354) , Rape(376) also fall in that category .


The Indian constitutions article 15(3) had been misused just for Vote bank in the name of Women or caste , the way in 66A the constitutions 19(2) was misused, but in reality there is no improvement in society for what such provision was made.

As per New Law if a women can term any Men as Molester or rapist without any medical evidence. 

 

Mere on her Verbal allegations, you will be arrested and even after court trail found the same was #Fakecases hardly any Police officer or Judge will evoke CRPC340 or IPC 182.

 

Our Law Makers and women organizations along with some radical Feminist  Ideology Electronic Media always promoted such decoration Law as Non-Bailable , lead to massive Misuse and violation of Constitution article 21-( Live & Liberty) .

 

Now , when SC will wake up and take corrective action against such LAW which had been made under misuse of article 15(3) by violating article 21?

 

One Delhi Girl Almost Ruined The Lives Of 2 Boys With Her False Gang-Rape Testimony. Here's What Happened

Indiatimes has in its possession the formal judgment (dated 28 February 2015) pronounced in the 2012 ‘Amity rape’ incident. The incident dates back to 2012, when a girl had accused two boys of gang-raping her. 3 years later, the incident received a conclusion – the boys were free to go. During this time, the boys served 1 year in prison, and 2 years of regular criminal proceedings.

After 3 years of being labeled criminals by society, friends and family, Prashant and Milind, 2 Amity University boys have been acquitted by a trial court of allegations of raping a fellow student. The court pulled up Delhi Police and the investigating officer (IO) for carrying out a biased probe, cooking up evidence and hiding crucial information in the case which proved the innocence of the accused.

According to the police, the alleged incident took place on the afternoon of June 14, 2012. Prashant called the woman, who was his batch-mate, to Vasant Vihar to watch a movie. He was accused of giving her an alcoholic drink, driving her to a secluded place in Paschim Vihar in his Honda City car, calling his friend Milind to the spot and gang-raping her.

At face value, you can see that the testimony the girl gave was pretty damning – there was the dramatic allegation – intoxication and violently forcing a girl to submit to rape.

And just her statement was enough. Just her testimony led to investigating officers framing charges on the two boys. She also claimed that she had been treated so badly that she "had developed suicidal tendencies". Her statements were treated with even more delicacy particularly in the wake of gruesome attacks on women in the last 3 years after the infamous Nirbhaya incident. 

And then her testimony fell apart.

There was no DNA evidence.

The girl was admitted at New Delhi's AIIMS Hospital for 14 days after the rape, during which NO vaginal examination was conducted. She also said that the boys who gang-raped her had washed her clean to get rid of evidence. However, there was no residual DNA on her clothes. She also made accusations of “unnatural sex” – but evidence didn’t prove it. 

And what about the scene of the crime?

Police didn't actually investigate the scene of the crime, the place where she claimed she was raped. 

And the violence against her?

If they had explored the place, they MIGHT have found traces of her blood that spilled when she cut her leg there. When there were no cut marks on her body, she claimed that she was beaten with an ice bag. 

Which was also false - as Advocate Prashant Mendiretta, counsel for the accused, informed us. How can this ice not have melted in 42 degree temperature, in a room that had no fridge, air conditioning or even a fan? These were the conditions she described of the room she was supposedly raped in.

Psychological trauma?  

The court also rejected the prosecution's claim that the woman was so traumatised that she initially did not report the rape but only spoke about assault. Relying on hospital records and other evidence, the court said the woman was in her senses when she was examined on June 15, 2012, a day after the alleged incident. The court also observed that it appeared that the woman, after the incident, faked psychiatric disorders and was therefore referred a senior psychiatrist at AIIMS. The woman spoke about being gang-raped by the duo only on June 28, 2012, 14 days after the incident.

The evidence that sealed her fate and saved the boys,

Cellphone records obtained show that during the time when she was allegedly being assaulted and raped, there were multiple calls made to her phone.

She spoke 1000 seconds: with her friend
She spoke 300 seconds: with her father
She spoke 400 seconds: with her mother

This is among 50-60 calls she made/received from her number. 

And yet, not once did anyone raise alarm. 

The cellphone tower position logs indicated movement of the cellphone. How can someone get raped, and have someone make/receive 50-60 calls from their phone?

The judge urged the police chief to frame guidelines making it mandatory for IOs to bring to the notice of the accused all evidence in a case, including those that favour the accused.  "She (the IO) has betrayed the trust reposed by the public upon a police official. The aim of the police officer should be to collect evidence and not to create it...(She) committed breach of professional standards by ignoring, disregarding and withholding material evidence which pointed to the innocence of the accused," the court noted while delivering the verdict.

With inputs from Sana Shakil, TNN

Want to #StopAbuseofMen by #Fakecases ? Call 0-8882-498-498 to Join # SaveIndianFamily Movement.

Any law which allow registration of compliant on assumption should be  Bailable only. Let the assumption proved in court and then Arrest them , if required for Investigation .

• #Scrap498a & Stop #Fakecases - YouTube

  ▶ 1:16
  
  
   

 

#HugYourDad & take Vow to Stop Fatherless Child society in India on #FathersDay.

Vicks VapoRub #HugYourDad - YouTube

▶ 1:19

“This father’s day, I am expressing my love towards my dad by participating in the #HugYourDad activity at BlogAdda in association with Vicks.”

 

Only a Father can put his life at risk knowingly or unknowingly for his Child. Many of you would have heard this popular story: 

Once a fatherand his 8 years old daughter was to cross a river. There was only one small damaged bamboo bridge to cross the river. The chances of bridge breaking down were very high if one was to walk through the bridge.

The father asked his daughter to hold his hand tightly, so that she would not fall down.

But the daughter said, “NO”, you hold my hand instead of me holding your hand.

The father was surprised and asked his daughter the reason?

The daughter replied, “I may leave your hand by mistake, but I know you will never leave my hand in any condition”.

That is the trust and confidence a Father gives to his Child.

Recently I witnessed an Advertisement of Gillette Role Model camping, where a 9 year old boy named Rudra, fights with his friend Kush, as Kush was hitting a sixer on every ball Rudra bowled to him. Rudra started using abusive words and they both end up fighting.

When his father questions him, from where he had learned such abusive words, he innocently replied “On TV bowlers use such words for Batsmen”.  

His father then tells him to go and apologise to his friend and congratulate his friends for his success.  

The boy asks his father “Why to congratulate?”

The father asks back, “Who hit the Six?”

The boy replies, “Kush”.

Father asks again “So, should Kush not be congratulated?”

Rudra understands what his father was trying to teach him. He rushes to Kush and apologises and congratulates him. His father later approaches Rudra and tells him that he will teach Rudra new bowling technique, so that he can bowl Kush out in the first ball the next time.

Father is the first teacher any child witnesses from their childhood. 

These all are happy stories that we all remember. But there are hidden truths in Indian society and courts of LAW, where more than 95% fathers are denied the custody of a child although comparatively they are more capable of taking care of their child’s welfare. Their paternal emotions for their own children get smashed day after day in the courtrooms, but Judges continue to use fathers as FREE ATM machines.

With time more and more anti-men, anti-father laws like 498A, DV, CRPC125, adultery laws etc, family harmony is being destroyed and the couple are fighting in court across 6 to 8 cases against each other. Such fathers and husband are treated as guilty till proven innocent.

The verbal statements of a wife are considered as gospel truth, irrespective of the audio/video evidence husbands and fathers provide, irrespective of their heart wrenching distress that is evident to all present in the courtrooms. Everyone, but the judges can see that he is not at fault, and label him a criminal, a worthless, incapable father unless higher courts state otherwise.

On average it takes between 5 to 7 years to prove a man his innocence. Historically and statistically, in more than 90% cases courts eventually find Husbands and fathers not at fault. However by this time he has lost 5 to 7 years of his golden years that he would have lived and shared with his loved child. No court, no society, no sympathy, nobody, not even Almighty God can give back those precious years to a husband, a father. While a father lives in pain during these years, a child misses out on all the love, affection, care, guidance that the child would have received from his father.

The most unbearable pain such fathers get is the pain of being deprived to meet and share moments with their own child or children. Many a times, when such pain crosses a certain threshold, fathers see no choice but to end their lives to stop living with such unbearable pain. In SIF, we have witnessed numerous cases where men have ended their lives silently, but at the same time being apologetic to their children for not having suffered ongoing pain. On various video sharing websites like Youtube, one can find many videos like that of Syed Makhdoom who have left final messages for their children and the world.

As a SIF moderator, in last 10 years, I have seen more than 7000+ cases, where a husband has been treated just like a free ATM machine. To get a basic visiting right for his child, court keeps giving dates after date. After many years of a long painful fight against the rotten, corrupt system, when he does eventually get a legal right, the wife does not obey the court order and poisons the child’s mind against his own father, labelling him as the worst person in the world; as ifDawood Ibrahim would be a better person than his own father.  

Anish Aggarwal, a 38 years old bright Software engineer, has been paying Rs 6000 per month for the past 2 years as maintenance to his child; however he continues to wait to meet his child. He continues to endure this pain in hope. Hope that one day he will be able to meet his child, give him a hug and shower his blessings upon the child. His child and he continue to miss those precious moments that they both deserve and need as humans.

Mr. ShymalVikram, 39 years old, HR manager in a MNC, managed to see his child in the 8^th year after paying Rs 8000 per month for 7 years. He was over the moon when he met his child. However who will return those precious 7 years of love and affection that he wanted to give and his child had right to receive? 

Mr. KunalMitra, had child visiting order in hand for 3 year, but failed to meet his child. When he reached in front of his wife’s home to meet his child, she filed more cases like Domestic violence to threaten him. Why has society given such ludicrous powers to wives that they continue to misuse and destroy a father and his love for his child?

Mr. Ashish Sarkar, 38 years old works in a media house. For the last 2 years he has been fighting in a court to find out if his child is a son or a daughter, let alone see the child. His wife on the other hand seeks maintenance for the child! Where is humanity heading, where is our Indian society moving towards with so much greed and selfishness?  

Mr. Ashish Sarkar, had a judgment, where the judge clearly mentioned in maintenance cases order, that it is totally unfair on part of wife to hide the child’s sex. Unfortunately due to rampant gender bias and blindness towards men and fathers, he cant do anything against such injustice even in a court. Why do we have a judicial system that is so diseased and disabled? 

Similar to such real life situations, such injustice to Indian fathers is rampant. India is heading speedily towards a fatherless society.  

In a recent letter, a Delhi based NGO Save Family Foundation questioned WCD (Women and child Ministry) on Father’s Day - Can a Child get Divorced?( Link )

They also cited statistics on how a Fatherless society is dangerous:

As we know fathers play a vital role in the development of a child. In United States of America, reported statistics inform us that Children from fatherless homes are:

1. 5 times more likely to commit suicide

2. 32 times more likely to run away from home.

3. 20 times more likely to have behavioural disorders

4. 9 times more likely to drop out of high school.

5. 10 times more likely to abuse chemical substances (become drug addicts)

In India, if you were to go through the crime data on Children and Adolescents, you will notice that more than 70 percent are fatherless children while more than 90 percent of call girls under prostitution net, confirm that they don’t have a father.

But will our LAW makers, WCD and Court Judges ever understand this and should they continue to use fathers as Free ATM machine only? If only money were able to provide a good welfare fora child, then all children from rich homes would have good moral characters and would never have any criminal records.

A child needs a teacher, a trusting relationship, a guiding friend, a loving father and a figure who has a God-like nature for blessings. Only a father can provide these as a single entity on this planet. These cannot be bought by money and no other human can give these to a child the way a Father does.

Now a days we witness Supreme Court, LAW makers and radical feminist groups advocating mediation/counselling from women’s cells all across the country. However these women cells have become cells of legal extortion and blackmailing cells for desperate, distressed fathers.

In my opinion as an advocate for Family harmony and child benefit, I suggest that children should have access to both parents irrespective of whether couple are able to reunite or separate amicably. That should be a standard process if we are to keep the child’s welfare at the forefront. Clearly a child cannot express such common-sense desire in women’s cell or Police stations or the NGO heads who are too often blinded in the name of women empowerment.

Please don’t kill the emotion of a Father for his child, an emotion that cannot be created or duplicated by force, law or threats. Biased practices in the courtrooms and society also kill the emotions of a child that are created by nature. Such emotional bonds are needed for a normal development of a child physically, emotionally, morally, spiritually and socially.

Very sadly, many lawyers, judges and others with blinded vision feel proud when a wife gets complete child custody or receives a big fat amount of money in the name of child care. Commonly we hear “A child has been united by his mother”. Nobody says “A child has been separated from his Father”. Such children become and remain fatherless forever.

As responsible adults, we must encourage children to meet separated Father’s home every weekend and whenever there is an opportunity, instead of supervised visitations or meetings limited to family court premises or within a park etc.

We must seek Law makers and Politicians to Grant immediate and equal (child) access to both parents, to legislate laws and make co-parenting mandatory to prevent expanding a fatherless society.