Friday, 18 July 2014

Husband Burnt Alive in India Not termed #DowryDeath

Crime does not have any Gender , which every one know , but due to biased media and radical women organisations any crime done by wife and their family members against Husband or Husband family never termed as Heinous crime in India.

Wife and their family members openly demand separate home, Car , Expensive Diamond/Gold Jewelery in wife name from Husband and from their family members , but we never termed the same as Dowry or any crime in India.

Any wife suicide with in 7 years of marriage for any reason the same termed as Dowry death in India and all blame not only to Husband, his mother/sisters also send behind the bar without any investigation , but when a married men suicide , the same not termed as Dowry death or wife is responsible.

From the crime Bure report we had witness the Husband suicide per year more than 64000 compared to wife suicide 34000 and every year the gap is increasing , but still we failed to amend the law to Spouse instead of wife .

Now come to Bride Burning Issue. Any women die in Burn injury , let it be accident or other cause also , but  no one is going to believe any think the Husband and their family put behind the bar. We had witness the cases where due to accident the fire in home and Husband tried his best to save his wife , but still the Husband convected even by SC under so called Dowry death.

Now do you know how many Husbands Burnt alive in India every year ? No , you will not know as media never make it a breaking news or there is no sensitive man who can think it is also a crime in India.

As per NCRB data every year more than 3300 men had been died burnt alive , but the same never get reported as in 304B only if wife die a case can be registered , if wife kill husband burnt alive the same never termed as Dowry death.

But due to rent-less effort by all SIF vol-enters now some small papers Journalist started to report some news where Husband Burnt alive by wife. But we will be wonder still how much time will take to wake up to our big News Journalist and Men of India to Stop such Barbaric crime by wife and their family towards Husbands family and make the law gender Neutral by replace the word Husband/wife to Spouse.

In Jaipur a Husband burnt alive and the Husband's Father running from pillar to Post to even register the FIR , forget about any arrest of wife.

Another Great wife Burnt his Husband as he was Dark , witness hear.

In UP another Husband burnt alive by wife , but it takes only a small News in Local Paper Only.

We do not know till how many years we will take to recognized that crime does not have any Gender and LAW should be Gender Neutral. Media Houses Keep ignoring such barbaric act done by Wife & thier family , result more and more Husband ending their life every year the same increasing by rocket speed.

Now the harrasement of Husband's other family does not stop on Husband's death. All this Husband Killers wife and their family members are now demanding the share in Property from Husbands Family and for that cases like 498A , Domestic Violence Act filed against many dead Husband's Parents, brother , Sisters.

In SIF we witness such harrasement every day , Husband Suicide, Husband cut in pics , Husband burnt Alive but alas , the in-sentative Indian Men , Media House along with LAW makers prefer to sleep in dip silence and suppress such suffering every day.

So , if you have a slight Humanity left in your heart wake up and #StopAbuseofMen with #FakeCases and Stop #CrimeAgainstMen also by replacing the LAW Husband/wife word to Spouse.

Want to #StopAbuseofMen by #Fakecases ? Call 0-8882-498-498 to Join # SaveIndianFamily Movement.

Tuesday, 15 July 2014

Stop Abuse of Boys from WCD's malicious proposal

Crime done by Child is not UN-common , but after all consideration , UN had made rule instead of punish them like adult , such child to be reformed as their development of Brain is still under construction. Many child get abused , ill treated , forced to Child labor , their child hood had been taken away by our society , we failed to provide a basic home to many home less child . 
Cores of Fund , shelter home provided under WCD , but the same never taken seriously that if a Child had done any crime , means it is our society failed to reform him or able to provide the necessary education to them and such child instead of punishment to be send to reform home or school and bring them in flow of Normal society .

Photo by Mark : Stop de-humanizing Men or Boys for their Gender

Now for well fare of child in India also have a ministry , but it is clubbed with Women and termed as WCD ( Women and child department).
We had witness several time , WCD failed to do the real welfare of child and now the most in-human act they are doing is abuse the boys by various fake cases.

A 40 year old women and 17 year old boy have some physical relation , the whole world term the women as rapist and send her to jail, but in India , it is the Boy termed as rapist , which WCD failed to understand. 

Save Family Foundation and their associated organizations had cautioned about the loop hole in anti-rape law, where the consented relationship had been converted to rape cases and increased the rape statistic in police record. At a time when various court asked:  “Tougher rape law leading to increase in false cases?”
When Gujarat CM termed the poor uneducated boys as Rejected mall , as a WCD minister she had preferred to keep her silence , proved beyond reasonable dought, she had no concern for child in the form of boys in this country and totally doing injustice to lacks of Homeless Child's of India.
Unfortunately the same facts and figures could not get into public and before that came another burning issue pertaining to Juvenile crime.
Minister for Women and Child Development Maneka Gandhi advocating treating juveniles accused of heinous crimes like rape on par with adult offenders.
She said according to the police, 50 per cent of all sexual crimes were committed by "16-year-olds who know the Juvenile Justice Act so they can do it." But now for premeditated murder, rape, if we bring them into the purview of the adult world, then it will scare them.
We have already filed so many objections stating the facts and figures of gross misuse and utter neglect of the WCD ministry in addressing them. However, when it has become eminent to the world that that the sections of law which were formulated for the protection of women have been grossly misused, the WCD has got no options to turmoil the brains of society addressing with new agenda and in short “ABUSE OF BOYS”.

WCD minister came out with a proposal by citing a totally malicious, unclean hand, hiding the real fact of statistics without applying any fair thought, behind such statistics. Does WCD unaware that any consented relationship with a girl’s vs Boys aged below 18 years , by default the boy had termed as rapist and the same added in rape cases statistics ?
We would bring to notice of WCD : When any girl or women have any physical relationship with a boy aged less than 18years, do you term the same as rape?
If the answer is no, then why a Boy had been termed as rapist by you, when he had any physical relationship with any girl aged less than 18 years?
WCD citing the report of Police that more than 40 % cases boys are involved, without any court order, how can she term all cases as true? Why she ignored the same police report when it had says more than 90% cases are mutual consent only, which latter converted to rape?

Instead of dealing with the figures of misuse and work on it, they are preparing another platform of misuse. This can be clarified with the simple example.
A boy and a girl fall in love in a co-ed school. They had some intimate sharing with the consent of each other.  Later the girl’s parents file a rape case on the boy. This innocent who has no count of IPC and CrPC is rigorously punished. Is it justified? Even when the police figures clarify the same as 90% of cases of juvenile rape are actually a consented sex, Maneka Gandhi is hurried to get Juvenile law amended.
So, the formula used by all radical groups along with WCD, first create a loop-sided Rape LAW by which massive false/fabricated cases can be filed to increase the statistics crime against women and then again demand to amend further law saying crime is increasing, crime is increasing.
The cycle continues and the crime against women never gets reduced and their demand/funds never get stopped.
We have severe objections and lay it down as below:
  • If Juvenile Law can be changed, change age for passport, driving license and bank account, etc. If a child can be termed as adult, as he has committed a crime which he doesn’t know, then in general a juvenile can be termed adult for all these.
  • If juvenile can be termed adult, why shall he not given voting rights at early age.
  • Age for consensual sex, drinking, etc to be reduced.
  • Age for marriage and conceiving is to be reduced as the juvenile is matured enough.
  • There have been numerous cases where boys have been used as a toy for pleasure by some nymphomaniac, however no such protection of child exists. Such acts should also be considered heinous and such women termed rapist.
  • WCD ministry has failed to curb the menace of child labor which has risen by 6% in a year for boys and is at its Apex, but is ready to turn a juvenile an adult bypassing all the biology doctors’ study for years. This clearly indicates their soiled intentions and unclean hands towards ABUSE OF BOYS.
  • Before implementing the amendment, it must be ensured that juveniles know all the 511 sections of IPC and 484 sections of CrPC, which Meneka Gandhi assumes that a juvenile has knowledge before committing such a heinous crime.
With all the above, it is quite eminent that the WCD ministry is not capable of handling child issues in a gender balanced thought process and thus the Women and Child Development shall break into two different entities.
The Supreme Court and various high courts have often stressed on the need to check the rampant misuse of such gender biased laws, basis this Maneka Gandhi has come up with new solutions of breaking families and promoting misuse and targeting boys only with hiding the real fact to hide their own failure to provide a safe, healthy education to poor Childs.
In a country the Child labor is banned, but every year 6% increase of boys in child labour, but WCD had not taken any corrective action, on the other hand the Sex between girls vs Boys below 18 years not banned, but WCD want to term boys rapist for a consented sex also.

Save Family Foundation, along with all their associated NGO all over India, once again demand to Prime minister to immediately stop such malicious act by WCD by separating the Child ministry from present set up as they had no concern for poor, uneducated boys or we should be ready to pay a heavy price as such step will increase only heinous crime in society, as we witness earlier also.

Wednesday, 9 July 2014

SC:No abuse of arrests under anti-dowry law, time to make 498A bailable

The Committee fears that failure to do so might leave no option except to dilute the law by making the same non-cognizable and bailable. In this context, the Committee recommends certain additional measures as contained in the succeeding paragraphs.

No Dowry arrests till magistrate's nod: SC , why such order made ? Look at the Graph , one hand the arrest of people is increasing in 498a , but after long trail Court found more than 85% people are not guilty. 

From the supreme court July,2014 judgment , it had proved beyond reasonable dought the government and police had failed to check the misuse of 498a and so the time had came to make the same bailable , demand Save Family Foundation and their associated organizations , as from the past experience , we witness such Judgments never followed by Police or by Government.
If we go through the NCRB data of 2013 recently released , the arrest had further incresed from 1.97L to 2.2 L , where as it was expected the same will be reduced as per new provision of CRPC41.

This is the 5th time Supreme Court had highlighted the need of stop the misuse of Dowry law like #IPC498a , but Government or Police had never taken any corrective actions.
In the last Parliament committee report by Rajya Sabah , it was clearly mentioned if the misuse of 498A does not reduced they have no option but to make it bailable.
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday said women were increasingly using the anti-dowry law to harass in-laws and restrained police from mechanically arresting the husband and his relatives on mere lodging of a complaint under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
Citing very low conviction rate in such cases, it directed the state governments to instruct police "not to automatically arrest when a case under Section 498A of IPC is registered but to satisfy themselves about the necessity for arrest under the parameters (check list) provided under Section 41 of criminal procedure code".
Section 41 lays down a 9-point check list police to weigh the need to arrest after examining the conduct of the accused, including possibility of his absconding.
Expressing exasperation over rampant misuse of Section 498A, a bench of Justices C K Prasad and P C Ghose said if police arrested the accused, the magistrate should weigh the preliminary evidence against the Section 41 checklist before allowing further detention.
"The magistrate, while authorising detention of the accused shall peruse the report furnished by the police officer in terms of Section 41 and only after recording its satisfaction, the magistrate will authorize detention," the bench said.
It also said that this check-list for arrest and detention would apply to all offences, which are punished with a prison term less than 7 years. Punishment under Section 498A is a maximum of three years but it had been made a cognizable and non-bailable offence, which made grant of bail to the accused a rarity in courts.
But the court singled out the dowry harassment cases as the most abused and misused provision, though the legislature had enacted it with the laudable object to prevent harassment of women in matrimonial homes.

Writing the judgment for the bench, Justice Prasad said there had been a phenomenal increase in dowry harassment cases in India in the last few years. "The fact that Section 498A is a cognizable and non-bailable offence has lent it a dubious place of pride amongst the provisions that are used as weapons rather than shield by disgruntled wives," he said.
"The simplest way to harass is to get the husband and his relatives arrested under this provision. In a quite number of cases, bed-ridden grand-fathers and grand-mothers of the husbands, their sisters living abroad for decades are arrested," he said.
The bench quoted "Crime in India 2012 Statistics" published by National Crime Records Bureau to say that nearly 2 lakh people were arrested in India in 2012 under Section 498-A, which was 9.4% more than in 2011.
"Nearly a quarter of those arrested under this provision in 2012 were women i.e. 47,951 which depicts that others and sisters of the husbands were liberally included in their arrest net. Its share is 6% out of the total persons arrested under the crimes committed under Indian Penal Code. It accounts for 4.5% of total crimes committed under different sections of penal code, more than any other crimes excepting theft and hurt," it said.
"The rate of charge-sheeting in cases under Section 498A is as high as 93.6%, while the conviction rate is only 15%, which is lowest across all heads. As many as 3,72,706 cases are pending trial of which on current estimate, nearly 3,17,000 are likely to result in acquittal," the bench said illustrating the misuse of Section 498A as a tool to harass husband and his relatives.
Describing arrest as a humiliating experience apart from curtailing the freedom, the bench said police have not shed their colonial hangover despite six decades of independence and were still considered "as a tool of harassment, oppression, and surely not considered a friend of public".
The need for caution in exercising the drastic power of arrest had been emphasized time and again by courts but has not yielded results, the court said and tasked the magistrates to check illegal arrests.
date of order: 2 July 2014
Our endeavour in this judgment is to ensure that police  officers do not arrest accused unnecessarily and Magistrate do not authorize detention  casually and mechanically. In order to ensure what we have observed above, we give the following direction:

 (1) All the State Governments to instruct its police officers not to automatically arrest when a case under Section 498-A of the IPC is registered but to satisfy themselves
 about the necessity for arrest under the parameters laid down above flowing from  Section 41, Cr.PC;
(2) All police officers be provided with a check list containing specified sub-clauses
 under Section 41(1)(b)(ii);
(3) The police officer shall forward the check list duly filed and furnish the reasons and materials which necessitated the arrest, while forwarding/producing the accused before the Magistrate for further detention;
(4) The Magistrate while authorising detention of the accused shall peruse the report
 furnished by the police officer in terms aforesaid and only after recording its satisfaction, the Magistrate will authorize detention;
(6) Notice of appearance in terms of Section 41A of Cr.PC be served on the accused  within two weeks from the date of institution of the case, which may be extended by the Superintendent of Police of the District for the reasons to be recorded in writing;
(7) Failure to comply with the directions aforesaid shall apart from rendering the police officers concerned liable for departmental action, they shall also be liable to be punished for contempt of court to be instituted before High Court having territorial jurisdiction.
(8) Authorising detention without recording reasons as aforesaid by the judicial Magistrate concerned shall be liable for departmental action by the appropriate High Court.
We hasten to add that the directions aforesaid shall not only apply to the cases under Section 498-A of the I.P.C. or Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, the case in hand, but also such cases where offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term which may be less than seven years or which may extend to seven years; whether with or without fine.

We direct that a copy of this judgment be forwarded to the Chief Secretaries as also the Director Generals of Police of all the State Governments and the Union Territories and the Registrar General of all the High Courts for onward transmission and ensuring its compliance.

Must watch :

DD NEWS Hindi :
DD NEWS English :