Judgement Madras HC in CRPC125 - Stop Treating husband like Armless Soldier.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14.07.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN RESERVED ON :07.07.2017 PRONOUNCED ON :.14.07.2017 CRL.RC. No.276 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2013.

At this juncture, it is to be stated that the trial are not to treat the husband like "armless soldier" and pass the maintenance award in on Mechanical manner.

While, arriving at quantum of maintenance for the wife and children (in maintenance proceedings), it is stated that Family Court (Judicial Magistrate Court dealing with the issue) as to take the entirety of the circumstances of the financial liability of the husband.

Admittedly, while arriving at the maintenance award for wife and children, the attitude of the trial Court especially, the Family Court awarding amount more than 2/3rd proved income is deprecated. Furthermore, it is to be stated that the fact that a husband who is a son to his father is liable to maintain the aged parents (in many case senior citizens) cannot be brushed aside lightly.

Besides, the moral obligation, there is a statutory obligation cast upon the every son to maintain the parents which is also falls under Section 125 of the CrPC and therefore, the trial Court ought to have weighed the entire circumstances as placed before the Court and to have reasonable assessment financial burden on the shoulder of the husband.

Thus, while awarding the maintenance in favour of wife and children the Court should take into consideration his responsibility to look after the aged old parents, since the husband has been fastened with statutory objections to look after and maintain not only his wife but also his parents under the very same Section 125 of CrPC.

Full Judgement : ( Click Here ) 

Will Youth ever try to remove Misandry (Male Hatered) ?

Manish( Name Changed to protect his identity ) a 25 years Bright Student of Delhi know every think about the LAW of Cricket, but totally unaware about India’s unfair, biased law like Rape, Dowry, #MaritalRape , Domestic Violence Act by which  one day he will be termed as Rapist for No fault at his end.

He was in a relationship with a Girl for 4 years but the Girl's family was not ready to accept him as Son-in-LAW, so they run away from home and got married. In return the Girl's parent file a Kidnapping and Rape case not only against him but drag all his family members like father, Brother, one close friend and married sisters also by claim they all supported her to Kidnapping the Girl.

His parents went to Jail and he had to surrender in Police station and was in police custody for 2 days and gets all treatment what is possible in Police custody. He keep repeating, he is not a Rapist, they are in relationship for last 4 years, but all go in deaf years.

At last he got the Bail from Court, but the tag of #Rapist put in his head will never go away so easily, but the girl prefer to go back to parents Home than support him and continue the married relationship.

Now the Police had closed the case and filed final reports to court it was not a rape case as both was married.

But after 3 months  the girls file, new cases under Domestic Violence and claiming residence Right of Girl's and maintenance 30K per month, one time compensations of 20 lacks.

They filed another case of 498A , with allegations that Manish refused to take her back and demanding 50 lacks as Dowry.

In a New twist she claim she had been Raped in married relationship also and every day Manish used to beat her and used to have forced sex, once he even hit him 18times in head for forced sex.

So, from a Rapist now he became Wife beater, Dowry seeker along with new term he rape his own Wife.

Once again court rejects her petitions as there was no frima face evidence and there was enough SMS, calls by her to Manish where she was asking to forget every think and let start fresh as married couple. But Manish had learnt enough and was very much hurt by the fact, for no fault why his parents and brother was send to jail? He can’t trust her 2^nd time, so best is get separated and let her start new life with some good guy than continue a relationship with a #Rapist.

Now the real Blow comes, her advocate refer a foreign funded women organizations who are desperate to send all men to Jail in #MatriaRape, the women organizations move to Supreme Court, but the SC also denied the Petition as she had already asked relief under Domestic Violence act, if there was any wrong done by Manish , he will be punished and have to pay the price under Domestic Violence act , 498A as well as Divorce with necessary alimony under section 25.

The same does not go well with Feminist groups and media Houses in India. They all geared up. By covering the face of Girls start playing the Victim Hood card and spread lie after lie that in India there is no relief to a wife if he faced #MatrialRape , so change the law.

They repeatedly hide the Vital information that in 2000 itself LAW commission made recommendation to make Rape related law like IPC375 , IPC376 should be Gender Neutral , so that irrespective men or women who ever do wrong should be Punished.

Now as a Indian men we are already full of misandary( Male Hatred) already in our mind , keep jumping in twitter and put our views how liberal we are without even knowing that 4 special law available in India fr a Wife if she face any #MaritalRape.

But the fact they also don't try to know, in India if a Husband rape his wife , she can seek relief under 4 special laws like Domestic Violence Act, CRPC125, 498A as well as Divorce. The truth is when wife do rape to Husband or to any other men in India, as per India LAW she had never punished. If the men try to tell the truth that he had been raped by women or raped by wife, instead of register any case against women/wife, the Rape cases registered against Men/Husband only.

 When a woman rapes (sex without mutual consent) our Indian Misandary( Male Hatred)  society and law colors the act with terms like loving or affectionate. Sadly some women consider such acts as their birth right over men. If a man tries to fight back or resist or even dreams of speaking the truth, he himself is labeled as rapist instead of being considered a Victim of rape.

Boys like Manish are not alone, every day many Boys had been termed as Rapist in this country and more than 70% cases court found the consented relationship converted to Rape in India.

Indian men today are filled so much misandary( Male Hatred) in their mind that they can’t foresee that the day is not too far when they all will termed as Rapist or wife beater for No fault. 

If you refuse to marry your will be termed as Rapist. If you marry then you will termed wife beater, dowry seeker and also rapist under feminist Proposed #MaritaRape .

But organizations like Save Family Foundation  who are advocating to amend the law gender neutral and promote Family Harmony reach to Delhi University Collage with a Hope , open your eyes than blindly believe the Lie spread by radical Feminist groups supported by Indian Media.

You can click for the Presentation  below : 

SIF Presents to DU College Misandry in Youth - YouTube

▶ 3:12

Want to #StopAbuseofMen by #Fakecases ? Call 0-8882-498-498 to Join # SaveIndianFamily Movement.

First make #RefusalofSex a Criminal offence then talk about #MaritalRape

Lie , lie and Lie , that’s how radical Feminist group and media fool the Indian by Playing the Victim-hood Card smartly.

• A wrong done by wives refuse to have sex without any justified reason and blackmailing Husbands , radical feminist groups termed as marital rape to hide their own wrong doing.

#RefusalofSex and #MaritalRape ( Forced Sex) both had been considered as Mental harrasement by #MiLord of SC and is an Ground for Divorce.

But radical activists want to make criminal offence only #MaritalRape but not the #RefusalofSex in marriage, which is totally #Unfair.

They say in India Husband have right to have forced or violent sex with wife and there is no relief to wives. This is a Blind lie. The truth is in India a Women or wife when rape a Men or Husband the same not termed as crime in Indian LAW.

Would request all read the law Like Dv Act ( Domestic Violence act) , where it had clearly mentioned in case of any sexual assault or Violence even a Name calling is offence . The women can get relief under DV act as protection order, compensations, and residence right. If the Men violate the protection order, he will be jailed immediately.

In addition to that, if women face sexual violence, she can seek relief under CRPC125; she can seek Divorce and alimony.

In addition under 498A also the men is Punished for doing such act.

So, there are 4 special laws exclusive for Women as a relief in case they face any sexual violence or assaults in marriage.

On the other hand , When a woman rapes (sex without mutual consent) our Indian society and law colors the act with terms like loving or affectionate. Sadly some women consider such acts as their birth right over men. If a man tries to fight back or resist or even dreams of speaking the truth, he himself is labeled as rapist instead of being considered a Victim of rape.

So the bottom line is in India , a Women have right to rape not only her Husband to any Men and the same is not crime as per LAW.

Another lie spared in NDTV show by a Feminist that Law commission had recommended to make #MaritalRape is a criminal offense.

But she had not mentioned that:

"The Law Commission in one of its Report dated March, 2000 had recommended that laws relating to rape (Sec 375 IPC) be made gender neutral.

But the recommendation was not accepted.  Why?
 

Will our Lawmaker ever take the moral responsibility and courage to replace the words “Men/women” by the word “Person” and replace words “husband/wife” by the word “Spouse”?

The Question asked why the #MaritalRape should not be termed as other Rape cases and the answer is:

1.     Where the women are not married with Men she had not given any consent to have sex as Legal Obligations.

2.     Other Women can’t seek relief under special 4 LAW which is available for a Wife.

3.     Other Women can’t restrict the man to have sex or re-marry to other women as per Constitutional Right 21 give Live and Liberty. 

4.     The present Rape Law are not gender Neutral, so every Possibility the Victim is not the women, the Victim is men.

5.     In married relation there are Consensual sex also , so you can’t determine the sex was consensual sex or forced sex by DNA or other forensic test.

6.     Most important the evidence act of present Rape law does not seek any medical exemption as prim face evidence. So , every Consual sex also can be termed as rape. 

7. Most important its not only in marriage relationship , any relationship you are in the form of marriage or love or live-in , terming your partner rapist is not only wrong, it is cheating and fraud.

Marriage LAW we have section 9 RCR - restitution of conjugal rights it is your obligations to have sex with your partner and it is the Legal right provided by Law in return it restrict your choice to have sex outside women. Even Supreme court of India mentioned in several Judgments #RefusalofSex without any medical reason is wrong and spouse have right to seek divorce.

As per our survey more than 98% cases Husband had been refused to have sex with their wife without any medical or Justified reason months after months , but feminist say , men have relief under such situation to seek for Divorce. 

Ohhh what logic, a wrong done by wife the solution is Divorce, then why same type relief a wife can’t seek like Divorce than crying foul I had been raped?

Also those feminist had not told you as soon as a Husband will seek Divorce on ground wife refuse to have sex, immediately he along with all his other family members will be termed as criminal under 498A, Dv act. Multiple litigation for maintenance will be filed as interim maintenance under CRP125, Section24 and section25.

So, a wrong done by wife but it is Husband have to pay the price and run from Pillar to Post to get Divorce ? 

So, if you really want to reduce the forced sex or violent sex the first step should be term #RefusalofSex as a Criminal offence, as during marriage it is your legal obligation and consent to have sex and you violate it. Then only there will be Domestic harmony.

No, No, now Feminist will come out with logic it is my body my Choice, I had get married to you does not mean you have right to use my body as Commodity.

100% agree with you all male hatred, but you will you buy the same logic if given by Men? If he refused to have sex with wife, will not you term him Impotent, he had done fraud, Cheating, have relationship to other women and drag him in multiple criminal cases?

Most important , if you buy any costly Diamond set or Beauty Parlor Cost by his hard earned money , why She also should not be send behind the bar under as crime under extortion or Robbery?

 

• So, next time before fall under feminist lie, must understand:

 

1.     In India if a Women face #MaritalRape she can seek relief under DV Act/CRPC125/Divorce/Section24/Section25/498A. But if she raped her Husband her Husband can’t seek any relief or Protection from her.

2. Refuse to have sex by Husband to wife without any justified reason is a offense in India as per Domestic Violence act , but the same not considered as any offense when does by wife.

3.     In India men does not have right to rape wife , if he does have to pay heavy price, but Women have all right to rape any men or her own Husband the same not crime.

3.     During marriage You have given consent to have sex with your spouse and it is your Legal Obligations as in returned you had ended his/her Choice of to have sex with other men/women outside wedlock.

5.     Terming forced Sex or violent sex as per with stranger Sex is nothing but unfair and cheating. 

6. If you are in any relationship in the name of marriage or live-in or love affairs, you can't term your partner a Rapist, first end it than cry foul rape , rape. 

7.     If you believe it is my body my Choice, then stays away from marriage and do not give false promise and obligation of marriage law. No one had put a Gun on your head to get married.

8.     If you use his money without her consent, be ready to go to Jail under extortion and Robbery cases also.

9.     A Husband can't be file rape case against Wife, let she rape you every day and then cut your body in 11 or 17 pieces.

10. A wrong done by wives refuse to have sex without any justified reason and blackmailing Husbands , radical feminist groups termed as marital rape to hide their own wrong doing.

 

 

• So, what is Solution?

 

Read the other LAW of other Country as Whole before compare a appeal to orange,

1.     Rape or Sexual assaults LAW should be Gender Neutral first. There should not be any excuses to support #RapistWomen of India.

2.     The Present relief given under Domestic Violence Law as protection first to be utilized and then see how many cases found true . Let first get the data from Court than depend on per-determined one sided biased study by funded organizations.

3.     To maintain Domestic Harmony the DV act to be made Gender Neutral like other country have.

4.     Abolish special law like 498A, 304B as no other country of the world have such decoration law.

 

The most important before believe unfair demand of #MaritalRape first make #RefusalofSex as criminal offense than only  giving a Lollypop solution to Men of Divorce , which never come without paying heavy price.

 

Related News : 

Making marital rape an offence will lead to false complaints - Deccan Herald

'Making marital rape an offence will lead to false complaints ... Business Standard

 

Refusal of Sex in Marriage : How Many time as Husband You had been refused to have Sex by Your wives without any Justified/Medical reason or in failure 2 purchase of Valuable items 4 her?
P.S. Marriage = Man forced to give up his choice 2 sex with other women Legally, #SpeakUpMan

— SwarupSarkar (@swarup1972) April 10, 2019

SERIOUS OBJECTIONS TO MARRIAGE LAW (AMENDMENT) BILL 2014.

SERIOUS OBJECTIONS TO INTRODUCTION OF MARRIAGE LAW (AMENDMENT) BILL 2014.

Click Here to Know proposed 13C/D/E/F of the Bill. Main objection to Proposed “Marriage(Amended) Bill 

With this Press Release, we members of Save Family Foundation hereby want to register very serious and strong objection to the process followed for the introduction of Marriage Law (Amendment) Bill. We have learnt from the latest news reports and from our calls to the Legislative Department of Law Ministry, and by meeting the Hon’ble Law Minster Sri. D.VSadananda Gowda that the Government is about to Introduce a new Law, Marriage Law (Amendment) Bill in this Winter Session. The draft bill is to change Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and Special Marriages Act.

Photo By Mark : Stop treat Men as Free ATM in the Name of Alimony

With this Press Release, we also wish to bring to your kind notice the CLEAR VIOLATION that Legislative Department has done while processing the new Draft. As per Pre-Legislative Consultation Policy (PLCP), decided on 10^th January 2014, it was decided, that  “The Department/Ministry concerned should publish/place in public domain the draft legislation or at least the information that may inter alia include brief justification for such legislation, essential elements of the proposed legislation, its broad financial implications, and an estimated assessment of the impact of such legislation on environment, fundamental rights, lives and livelihoods of the concerned/affected people, etc. Such details may be kept in the public domain for a minimum period of thirty days for being proactively shared with the public in such manner as may be specified by the Department/Ministry concerned.”

We bring to your attention to this Notification dated 5^th February 2014, D.O. No. 11 (35)/2013-L.I., which mandates the ministry to Publish the Draft Legislation in Public Domain for ATLEAST 30 days and in fact notify the affected people. Unfortunately, the current draft clearly violates this very important procedure laid down by the Committee of Secretaries (CoS) under the Chairmanship of Cabinet Secretary.

We also wish to submit to you that the Draft which saw widespread Public concern/panic, cannot be pushed again without having passed the Constitutional Procedures laid down in our Democracy.This is the same Draft bill which never saw the light at the end of the tunnel during previous government as BJP itself realized how disastrous this law was for Hindu Family and Hindu Men.The Bill was opposed by various segments of society and even ministries and got International-wide attention on India for proposing such a draconian law.

In spite of all the above, it is really SHOCKING and heart-breaking that the New Visionary Government, under a dynamic leadership who pledged “SABKA SAATH SABKA VIKAS” has not taken the TRANSPARENT route and is behaving same as the previous Congress led UPA Government now.

GRAVE FAR REACHING SOCIAL AND ECONOMICIMPLICATIONS OF THE PROPOSED MARRIAGE LAW AMMENDMENT BILL 2014:

1. 1. LOSS OF FAMILY VALUES AND FALL OF INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE IN INDIA

• Marriage will lose its sanctimonious purpose and become property acquiring business. Already, there is an increasing trend towards material expectations in a marriage; the amendment will have a far reaching consequence. With divorce no more being a taboo in India, the incentive of women taking divorce would work as reverse DOWRY menace where women would marry for property and not for family or love.
• China in 2010 amended a similar property annexing law when it found that it being misused extensively by women to grab property through marriages. With misuse of gender laws in India close to an all-time high, this is not the climate to introduce another dangerously draconian legislation. [1]

1. 2. SEVERE VIOLENCE AND SOCIAL UNREST IS HIGHLY PROBABALE

• Assets/Properties are acquired after years of hard work and not because of few years of matrimonial life. Losing hard earned property in case of failed marriage will lead to increase in Husband Suicide (already it is double) and Increase in Crime Rates.
• The Battle of Mahabharata was fought for five villages. With the proposed amendments the home of every Husband’s family is going to be in trouble. This Bill if passed in its current form may result in the very person sought to be benefitted/ protected becoming a victim of violence for protecting property as there is hardly any faith in the biased legal system. Will the BJP be willing to take full responsibility for this dangerous social disruption?

1. 3. INDIAN ECONOMY WOULD BE ADVERSELY IMPACTED & INDIA WILL NOT BE perceived as safe destination for FDI

• When the society is in unrest and family values are broken, the dream of “Make in India” would go for a toss. Economies like Vietnam, Thailand, Philippines, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Fijiwould grow and India would lose the unique opportunity it has to lure the world for “Make in India”.
• Indian men in fear of possible loss would stop buying properties and it would have adverse consequences to the nation’s economy.
• People would start accumulating wealth in alternate form like gold etc., which would result in a dull economy that believes in secure accumulation than investment for growth.
• With wealth and real estate not safe in India, Indian Men would surely think of investing in other countries the Black Money would be created and kept in secret. Today also in USA if a person shows $100K worth of investment to be made he is granted Green Card in no time. This way there is a brain drain and wealth drain as well.

1. 4. MASS CONVERSION FROM HINDU TO OTHER RELIGIONS

• Hindu men would want to convert to another religion to minimize their risks in matrimonial life. This mass conversion has its own extremely dire social complications.
• Hindu Men would stop marrying or do SAGOTRA VIVAH to keep the property in the gamily. This would itself create many honor killings and people taking law in their hands.

1. 5. INCREASE IN BACKLOG OF MATRIMONIAL CASES IN INDIAN COURTS

• It is an established trend and confirmed by Apex court that, in failed marriages women are grossly misusing IPC 498a and DV Act for extortion. This amendment will be another tool and further distress families.
• India has the youngest of the average population. There is a unique combination of youth and skills in this age group. Most of the relationship/marriage/family troubles occur in this age group. If this age group is not ina stable family and relationship state the productivity of INDIA would go down drastically when most are deeply immersed in litigation battles.

FLAWS OF THE PROPOSED MARRIAGE LAW AMMENDMENT BILL 2014:

1. The Bill, out-rightly violates the essence of Article 15 of Indian Constitutionwhichprohibits discrimination against any citizen on the grounds of religion or gender.  The Bill is also  unconstitutional as it takes away the basic rights of husbands, even to defend him or save his marriage, whereas the very same Bill gives the same rights only to the wives.
2. Internationally in similar law, property consideration in deciding permanent alimony is purely done on equitable financial contribution to property and duration of marriage and also based on conduct of both the parties. In present bill the contribution, duration, assets and ability of female spouse and liabilities and ability of the male spouse is completely ignored.
3. It completely ignores that a wife gets her share of inherited property from her parents under the latest Hindu Succession Acts. Blindly entitling wife for share in property at the divorce time under this no-fault divorce law is against social justice and completely not gender neutral. All men are assumed to be rich and wife is assumed to be poor which is clearly not true.
4. Even though a marriage can fail due to the fault of the husband or the wife, the bill essentially extends the “Financial Assistance” clause only to the wife and not to the husband and this is patently anti male.
5. When husbands are the petitioner for a divorce, the wife will be allowed to use the ‘Financial Hardship’ condition to block the divorce till her monetary demands are met, thereby legalizing extortion.
6. When a wife is the petitioner for a divorce, even though the husband may be in a “Financial Hardship” he will have no legal provision to claim monetary assistance from the wife or even to save his marriage.
7. This Bill would be widely misused against the husband who will be forced to “pay and buy” a divorce, reducing the institution of marriage into “Glorified Prostitution”.
8. Government’s intention of reducing back-log of matrimonial cases would not come through with this amendment, instead of letting the couple to arrive at a mutual consent it would only pressurize men and would get into an endless court battle in higher courts and would further increase.
9. Government’s logic of ending the financial hardship of a divorced wife is completely flawed as even as per government 70% of Indian population needs Food Security let alone have a house or property. In other 30% only 10% own their own homes and in those only a small percentage is Hindu that falls under this amendment. This bill is not going to bring a social change or security in any way when seen holistically.

OVERHAUL OF THE FAMILYLAWS IN INDIA IS NEEDED INSTEAD:

1. Hindu Marriage Act is conceived as an overall a gender neutral act and it must not me made gender biased in anyway.
2. The maintenance and alimony sections (HMA 24 and 25) must be brought up-to-date considering the enhanced education, earning capacity and women friendly work atmosphere in the country.
3. As women can and does inherit the property from her own parents under the present laws, women being given any direct or indirect share in in-laws property is illogical and against natural justice.
4. Consideration of any property while determining Alimony should be as per the financial contribution by husband and wife.
5. In case of non-financial contribution, devise a formula to evaluate minimum duration of marriage for applicability of property division as well as devise a formula to evaluate the contribution.
6. Pre-Nuptial Agreements should be made legal so as not to make marriage a gamble for Indian citizen and containing the risk of (breakage of) a marriage.

ALTERNATES FOR ENSURING FINANCIAL ASSITANCE & EMPOWERMENT FOR DIVORCED SPOUSE:

Marriage is an institution which if it does not work should not be a punishment for one party (husband) and a reward for another (wife). To empower women in true form, work opportunity should be provided by the state for a woman who faces grave financial hardships; adequate measures should be devised to address it, instead of penalizing husband alone.

We recommend the following measures to be strictly implemented:

• Hindu Marriage Succession Act of 2005 be strictly implemented. The woman’s share in her parent’s property should be SuoMoto given to her either at the time of marriage or at the time of Divorce is filed in the court (by either party) if the party wishes.
• In cases of unemployed women or women with long career break, State should take the responsibility of providing employment and livelihood to divorced wife, Employment for Divorced wife in line of Mahatma Gandhi NREGA must be institutionalized. A Divorced Wife Welfare Fund may also be created for financial support to them in line of the Food Security Bill.

OUR DEMANDS:

1. By attempting to create draconian marriage breaking laws like Marriage Law Amendment Bill on one hand and to legalize prostitution on another, the government has made its intentions very clear on what its wants to do with the sacred Hindu Family.  This bill needs to be immediately stopped and public opinion must be sought through an extensive public debate.
2. Issue the Draft for Public Opinion and responses on the Draft Bill.
3. Involve stake holders of similar stature in drafting procedure i.e., if there are no Men’s Rights Authority (like National Commission of Men) who are part of drafting then even Ministry of Women and Child Development and National Commission of Women MUST not be allowed to participate in this procedure.
4. Initiate the process of formation of National Commission of Men involving bodies who have been working for Men for years to bring the equitable balance back into the society in terms of Laws and Law Making process.
5. Initiate a Parliamentary Committee (Joint Select Committee) procedure to relook at the Draft and see if there is a need of such a law and if it is as per the guidelines of Hon’ble Supreme Court or being formed under pressure of some interested parties.
6. Amending section 13D and making it gender neutral and allowing both the Husband and Wife to pray for ‘Financial Hardship’.
7. Providing a clear & objective definition of “Financial Hardship’ so that this term is not interpreted in a wrong way and divorces are not sold by wives. All other maintenance cases filed by the wife, like Sec24, CrPC 125, DV etc, should not be allowed to continue, blocking the judicial dockets, as the relief sought in all of them, will also be available in this Bill only.
8. Creating objective parameters for calculating financial assistance like tenure of the marriage and relative sacrifice made by the parties in the marriage.
9. Reduce separation period from 3 years to 1 year under Section 13C – petition for divorce only after 1 year of marriage.

10.  Include condition of finishing/quashing all litigation before divorce is granted so that both parties can live peacefully and that judicial burden can be reduced.
11.  Condition of closing child custody litigation before granting divorce under Section 13C, so that rights of child to seek the involvement of both parents are not taken away from it.

Sir, we earnestly request your immediate intervention since such half-baked hastily prepared formulations, sans due consultation, & based on unfounded prejudices, have the potential to grievously imperil the social fabric of the society. This is apart from the stupendous economic impact caused by the matrimonial disputes and their offshoots including criminal cases. It is well acknowledged that Indian laws, i.e. the legal framework that enables a society to believe in justice and devote its energies to productive endeavors, has not kept pace with the times, is badly outdated and is designed more to benefit the legal fraternity than the litigating parties, howsoever pitiable and needy they may be. Strife and discord can only harm a society’s march towards improved quality of life. You have enthused the nation by giving it a vision, courage to dream big and faith in its ability to achieve the same but all this would necessarily require a healthy society where the mind is fearless. We request you to take decisions that have far reaching consequences after due thought and consideration.

Looking forward to your kind help and support and immediate action as per the Prayer .

---

[1]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/8714097/China-tries-to-stop-women-marrying-for-money-rather-than-love.html
Click Here to Know why China SC scraped such LAW.