| ''Do
you know what is difference between 66A and 498A? SC earlier termed
misuse of 498A as Legal terrorism , but government had not taken any
action. So first 498A to be scraped. Make a Google search 498A, who do
not know the same.66A At least you need some evidence, 498A you do not
need any evidence, only verbal aligation is sufficient to term any
tom/dick/harry criminal , let he 3-years old child or 92 yrs old women ,
let he stay near by your home or stay in Uk or Us or Pakistan.All LAW
the arrest should be stopped on the basis of compliant , let you prove
your aligation and punish them or hang them, what is the problem? why to
arrest some one only on the basis of compliant? Scrab all such law
which allow police to arrest any one on the basis of compliant , let the
same is false fabricated or true.''
|
The bottom line is :
Act
66A to register a Man/women need to be write some think which can be assumed offensive, but for 498A
to register or arrest some one there is no need to write any think,
whatever a wives writes assumed to be True and the Husbands , his
mother , sisters, small child all can be arrested , irrespective their age, location of stay in the name of relative.
Act 66A can be misused against you , but it can't be misused against your father, mothers, sisters, brothers or child, but 498A can be misused against all your relative as mentioned above.
Several time several person bring it , to the Notice of
Supreme court and supreme court them self at least 4- times given
Judgments about the misuse of 498A and government every time prefer to
sleep with the Justification misuse of law is not a ground to amend the
law.
Result the misuse of LAW spade like Cancer in society and as
Supreme court never interfere to LAW making process, our LAW makers
even pass the LAW without any debate as per their wish and common men
suffered.
Now as we cant expect any remidey from the Goverment ,
the Supreme court must review all the LAW where the complint can be
registered with assumption and arrest can be possible must be termed nul
and Void , let the goverment go back to thier calss room and rewrite
the law and stop making duplication of law.
Supreme court must
put guidelines and it is time to act as they had given enough chance to
govement but they are silent on the ground of misuse of law in this
country :
1. A person can't be punished twice for the same offense , so if any law made with duplication to be termed as nul and void.
2.
Any law which allow registration of compliant on assumption should be Bailable only. Let the assumption proved in court and then Arrest them , if required for Investigation .
3.
When any case it had proved beyond reasonable dought the compliant came
to court in unclean hand and abuse the process of LAW to gain his own
other interest, they must be punished by default at any stage of cases.
4.
More and more admissible of technology like voice recording, mobile cal
details, video recording, any documentary evidence to be consider as
evidence than some verbal allegations or witness statements as prima
face evidence.
5. Stop misuse of constitution 15(3) in the name of
positive discrimination allow any section to do the crime and get Scot
free. Law should be gender neutral and crime based instead of any case,
religion or sex.
or
As i already said earlier whole world
will make fun of our criminal justice system, where we can't book a real
criminal , but can arrest any Tom/Dick/Marry on some assumption based
criminal law as the same is Non-bailable.
Join SIF Team
to Stop this legal terrorism of India and demand to replace the word
Husband/wife to Spouse to all marriage related LAW or policy like all
over world follow instead of making assumption that all wives born in
Raja Harish Chandra family ( never lie) and all husbands born in
Criminal family.
We wonder Whose life is in More Danger in India : Men or Women
Crime Bure data 2005 : Married Men Sucide : 52k vs Married Women Sucide 28K.Still there is no LAW to Protect Men why?
2006 Crime Bure Data : Married Men Sucide:55452 vs. Married Women Sucide:29869.
2007 Crime Bure Data : Married Men Sucide:57593 vs. Married Women Sucide:30064.
Will
Our LAW Maker change the LAW 304B( dowry death) to 304C( Sowry Death)
and 498A ( harassment to wife) to 498B ( Sowry harassment by wife)
| Details of Dowry Law Cases for the year 2007 (Source - NCRB) |
|
|
|
|
| S. No. | Description | 2007 | %age |
|
|
|
|
| 1 | No. of Person Arrested under (498A +304B)* | 215733 | 100% |
|
|
|
|
| 2 | Child- Under 18 Years | 457 | 0.21% |
|
|
|
|
| 3 | Senior Citizen-Above 60 Years | 6764 | 3% |
|
|
|
|
| 4 | Women | 40451 | 19% |
|
|
|
|
| 5 | No of Persons arrested under 304B* | 28193 | 13% |
|
|
|
|
| 6 | No of persons arrested under 498A | 187540 | 87% |
|
|
|
|
| 7 | No of persons chargesheet | 165040 | 77% |
|
|
|
|
| 8 | No of persons arrested but not chargesheeted | 8857 | 4% |
|
|
|
|
| 9 | Under investigation | 41836 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 | No of persons under trial * in 498A and 304B IPC | 750736 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 | No of persons who have completed the trial (498A + 304B) | 104745 | 49% |
|
|
|
|
| No of persons completed trial only in 304B | 16816 |
|
|
|
|
|
| No of persons who have completed trial only in 498A | 87929 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 | No of persons convicted under 498A and 304B | 18827 | 18% |
|
|
|
|
| 13 | No of persons convicted under only 304B | 5580 | 33% |
|
|
|
|
| 14 | No of persons convicted only in 498A** | 13247 | 15% |
|
|
|
|
| 15 | No of persons whose case acquitted / discharged only in 498A | 74682 | 85% |
|
|
|
|
| 16 | Only 498A case of living women court found guilty after trail ( 87-85)% |
| 2% |
|
|
|
|
| 17 | No of persons whose cases have been compounded or withdrawn | 13739 | 6% |
|
|
|
|
| % of Person found not guilty vs Arrest in 498A on average |
| 94% |
| *Total no of persons under arrest including those in previous year |
|
|
| ** Person convicted under 304B are also convicted under 498A |
|
|
| hence, those convicted only in 498A is 12-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hightlights : |
|
|
| 1. 94% of the people arrested were found not guilty (pre & post trial). |
|
|
| 2. 85%
found not guilty after the completion of the trial - but these 85% were
also arrested without any investigation. Maximum convection in 498A in
case of 304B( 18827 trial), where the person allready spend more than 1
year Jail, but proved their innocence in 304B, but convected in 498A by
defult to neturilise the Jail term. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Source : | http://ncrb.nic.in/cii2007/cii-2007/table12.htm |
