#StopAbuseMen a movement intends to work for Men's welfare and strongly believe in replacing the word Men/Women by Person and Husband/Wife by Spouse in any Government law or policy.
#MenToo are Human, they also have Constitutional Right to Live & Liberty with Dignity (#Article21 ) .
#Unfairlaw or Policy can not bring Fairness in any Society, it only kills fairness in Justice System and harmony in Society. #SpeakUpMan.
Help Line for abused/distressed Men ( SIF - One): +91-8882498498.
I Proved My Innocence : It’s Not #News: My Live & Liberty with Dignity Denied!
Please share your Story , awareness is key to Stop Abuse Men.
We witness on mere allegation #MediaTrail start, but when the same Man proved his innocence in Court of Law, Main Stream #Media ignored.
#Article21 a constitutional Right of a person: Live and Liberty with Dignity snatched away but our Law Makers and Judiciary remain silent.
Twitter Id: @swarup1972
Email: swarup1972@gmail.com
Help Line for Distressed and Abused Men : 8882498498
After 3 Yrs Girl Say I was not Raped, Court Directs to Return 10 L Compensation https://t.co/klWl6adxS8 via @law_trend@HMOIndia why girls family should not file #FakeCase to get such easy money on mere filling FIR? Who will return Live, liberty & Dignity of Men termed #Rapist?
#YellowJournalism at Best: There's a false narrative being created by so called women's rights activists in India which is also being supported by Media Houses.
The narrative is that Indian Husbands do forced sex with their wives without consent and go scot FREE. They never question when wife does forced sex with her husband against his will or consent, is wife termed as a Rapist?
The logic which is given is that in modern days marriage is based on equal partnership hence wife’s will or consent is to be respected like an unmarried woman irrespective . Further a married woman’s right to say No to sexual relationship is being compared to that of a Sex worker right to say No to customer.
Fact is that India has already criminalized forced sex (#MaritalRape) with wife by Husband and provided laws such as #IPC498A & #DVAct to protect wife and punish not only husband, his relatives too. But the same protection has not been accorded to any Indian Husband as the laws are gender specific.
Forget about Sex if any Husband even Kisses his wife without her consent Husband can be sent to jail on mere verbal allegation by wife & no evidence required in #IPC498A for an FIR against family.
In #DVAct, husband can be thrown out from his Home on mere allegation by wife that husband had forced Sex with her and husband’s family is collateral damage. She gets protection order & on her single testimony husband can be sent to jail in the name of breach of protection order.
In #CrPC125, a Husband is asked to beg, brow or steal but he even has to pay his divorced wife or working wife till she's alive or she gets remarried as per recent precedents, irrespective if the breakdown of marriage is due to his or her fault.
As per #NCRB-2020 Suicide data, Husband suicide is 73093 whereas Wives suicide is 28085.
Have Judiciary or Law makers made any effort or action plan how to reduce Husband Suicide in Last 75 years?
Just a group of elite Men & Women are desperate to term Husband a Rapist for their own self-interest, nothing else !
When a wife does forced sex with her Husband without his will or consent, they will never term the wife a #Rapist. Why the will or consent of Husband should not respected by law makers/society should also be the question?
No one will understand the violation of Men's Constitutional rights under Article14, Equality before law & equal protection by law to all citizens irrespective of gender and Article 21, Life, Liberty & Dignity of a person.
The burning question is that why Man should marry at all with Indian woman when he knows marriage would give wife a #RedCard, which she can use any time and term him a #Rapist and he does not even have a #YellowCard in marriage.
As a result #MarriageStrike is the only option for common man in India till the law makers, judiciary and society do not take corrective action to make modern day marriage in India too as equal partnership in true sense and replace the word husband/wife to spouse in every law related to marriage relationship.
शौक़ नहीं मज़बूरी है #MarriageStrike ज़रूरी है !
STOP ABUSE of MEN : MEN ARE HUMAN TOO !
None will understand violation of Men's Constutional right. Must watch below to educate your self. Forget about forced sex with wife without consent, even Husband can't kiss a wife without her consent. He termed criminal via #IPC498A#DVAct do u know?https://t.co/iOtZQEW41v
"My clients r certainly not against recognising spousal sexual violence. They r sayıng it merits a separate & slightly special treatment which legislature has already done. In addition special treatment has been accorded to it in other jurisdictions also" https://t.co/RqzqX4E3Hh
#MaritalRape Exception Based On Intelligible Differentia Of Marriage: #MenWelfare Trust Argues Before Delhi HC https://t.co/LWhvQiNuzw Deepak concluded by referring to Parliamentary Committee Report which dealt with sec. 375 of IPC & international position, specifically UK law .
"in case of sexual abuse in a marriage, a "basket of remedies" is already available in law, which is different on account of difference in relationship & context, & their alleged "inadequacy" cannot be a ground to strike down the exception.#MaritalRapehttps://t.co/UQjdiBvZHD
Sexual relationships, whether marital or non-marital, stand on same footing-militates common sense & mere difference of opinion on this can't make #MaritalRape exception IPC375(2) unconstitutional. #DelhiHighCourt was told on Thursday by NGO @MenWelfarehttps://t.co/Iohmq7XtZp
Social aspects would have to be considered: #MenWelfareTrust@MenWelfare at #DelhiHighCourthttps://t.co/0GeVhwPVOo To say this has no social impact or it's not a social issue would be to truncate the entirety of particular position. Social aspects would have to be considered.
However reasonable, legally backed, research based balanced arguments we present but somebody working for th cause of men would always be portrayed as misogynist, unreasonable, patriarchal etc. This is th mind wash media has been doing to serve agendas of some foreign funded NGOs pic.twitter.com/yGxammBmJN
Be a self-supported, self-volunteer commando of @SFFNGO @MenWelfare to Stop Abuse of Men.
STOP ABSUE OF MEN !
A time will come in your life, when you will feel every thing has been lost. My friend that's the time Real Story of your life will start. Be #Misandry & #Mangina FREE ! Be a self-supported, self-volunteer commando of @SFFNGO@MenWelfare to Stop Abuse of Men. pic.twitter.com/EXWEZoWraZ
#लड़कीहूँलड़सकतीहूँ : सब के पता है। Boys be #Mangina FREE !
Abusing, Cheating, blackmailing, extortion of money from Men/Husband/BF they can do without any fear of Law in India. #NoVoteToMaleHaters who are silent #CrimeAgainstMen .
#MarriageAgeDebate: My Live discussion with @JM_NEWS_INDIA .
#MarriageAge increase is irrelevant. Without amend #ChildMarraigeAct it will lead to more sexual disease, unwanted Pregnancy, Abortion, Fake #RapeCase increase, Extortion from Boys family.
"Guzara Bhatta" - MWT talks to Honey Chourasia https://t.co/a3l2KoxYa3 via @YouTube MWT chats with the Director, Singer, Honey Chourasia @honey_chaurasia about his journey for new song, "Guzara Bhatta". Must watch & Share for awareness #GuzaraBhattaSong !!
Rubaru with Mr. Suhaib Ilyasi
(Director & Producer - Hindi Movie, "Shaadi, Dahej & Gangster")
Synopsis: Jignesh Bhai Patel (Alok Nath) is a billionaire NRI businessman living in London with his wife Sudha (Reema Lagoo) and son Harsh. Their household is highly patriarchal and strictly follows Indian traditions. Harsh decides to marry a girl from India, unaware of the conspiracy set by his prospective in-laws, Deepak Tijori and Supriya Karnik. Will an entire gang in the guise of the ‘bride’ and her relatives bring his doom?
Starring: Harsh Nagar, Alok Nath, Farida Jalal, Reema Lagoo, Deepak Tijori, Deepraj Rana, Supriya Karnik
Directed By: Suhaib Ilyasi
Amit Lakhani, a well known Men's Rights Activist and President of Men Welfare Trust (Registered NGO), part of Save Indian Family (SIF) Movement, brings to you, this interview with the man behind this movie on the misuse of dowry harassment law.
We strongly believe in the Principle of Natural Justice, that a person is innocent till proven guilty by competent Court. This Principle needs to be protected at every cost.
Those who violate it by doing accused naming/shaming, #JudgeShaming, #JudiciaryShaming via social media must be punished strongly.
Every accused has the right to have a fair trial in criminal Justice system (even in cases like that of Mumbai Terror attacks by Kasab & other convicts, this court ensured Fair Trail). That’s the protection granted by the Constitution of India and also by Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR).
We write to you in reference to the recent judgment of #TarunTejpal case. The Women Activists across the country used every tool from the “book of naming & shaming” to run smear campaigns against the Accused, many violating the court orders of no media reporting. That was all through the trial period. But once the Judgment is out and the accused was found “not guilty”, the same women activists have now directed their abusive verbal firing against the presiding judicial officer herself.
Many Women Activists & Journalists have termed the individual judge as regressive mindset & questioning her credibility. It is pertinent to mention that while a judgment can always be appealed against legally and there are proper guidelines from the Hon’ble Supreme Court on what amounts of questioning a judgment as a “freedom of speech” and what amounts as “contempt of court”, these Women Activists & Journalists are just not abusing the judgment, but the Judge herself now. Does this not amount to offence in India?
Will the Hon’ble Supreme Court step-in to save the term “Hon’ble” for Judges?
If the same defamation, online abuse is not contempt of court – then what for contempt of Court exists in our Law book?
We have witnessed several cases, where Lower court convicted or acquitted a person depending upon merits of the case & then also subsequently High Court & Supreme Court reversed the Judgments. There have been even instance of the Superior courts questioning the application of Judicial principals of the lower court judgments, but there too, the dignity of the presiding officer is not attacked. Is this attack allowed to the outside world, specially to Women Activists?
If we go through various High Courts & Supreme Court judgments, number of Lower court judgments u/s IPC 375, 354, 498A were reversed as Lower Courts wrongly convicted accused in approximately than 70% of these cases. In such cases, no one questioned the Lower court Judge’s creditability or termed them as regressive mindset or made sarcastic statements equivalent to taunting the judge itself.
Even simple bail applications are rejected in routine manner in the Lower Courts and the person has to reach upto High Court or Supreme Court only to get his merits noticed to secure the Bail.
The lower court Judges are already under humungous pressure to convict a MALE accused on mere allegations due to #MediaTrails and in very few cases they are able to conclude fare trails.
Result is, we see that in number of Judgments in HC or SC even in bail application, where the judgment needs to be completely reversed.
Present case at Hand:
A woman termed a Man ‘Rapist’ during a Lift journey of a 5-star Hotel during a company event – which is well covered with multiple CCTVs. It was a perfect case, where from the CCTV footage itself Police could have closed the case with B-report and should have initiated CrPC 182 (Attached court observations).
It could have saved so many years of just not the Judicial System / Court itself but would have also given more time to “media convicted” accused to save his little dignity, if not his whole life.
But due to the media trial & hostage of Justice by #WomenActivist group, the Investigating Officer was forced to work in a biased manner.
IO was forced to even manipulate the critical evidence and was forced to make more than 3000 pages “one sided” chargesheet with more than 150 witnesses, prosecutrix email/whatsapp etc. just to ensure to conviction the accused.
Now for the Man as an accused, only option left to prove his innocence was the fact that women refused to go for medical examination / DNA Test and since it was not possible to find truth via medical test or forensic test, had to bring on record the
hiding of material facts, coming to court with unclean hand sand contradictory statements of the Prosecutrix.
In the Judgment, nowhere it has been claimed by the Judge that the women’s statement not creditable because of her character.
Women Activists are questioning the discussion about unclean hands of victim in the judgment, but if that defense is also taken away from an accused, why to have CrPC or CPC or the Courts itself?
Because Women Activists run the law and the country, Right?
On mere allegation – it will be justified to term a person as guilty?
Will this be termed as fair trial?
A person is innocent till proven guilty, but for #WomenActivist group convicting a male accused even before a court trial begins, is a habit. This has happened in almost all the cases involving gender issue, which few women activists use as a matter of their profit. But the judiciary has maintained utter silence and has never taken any action against this.
But now, a new narrative is being established by these #WomenActivists that a male is termed guilty even when he proves his innocence in the Court. Is this justified & fair in a Criminal Justice system?
But #WomenActivist intentionally mislead people that it was victim shaming to justify their #JudgeShaming & attack on the Judge. They intentionally ignore the merits and fact and the judicial application of the mind to acquit the accused.
The male accused and his advocate had to prove the contradiction, hiding of fact and unclean hands of the prosecutrix – as there is no other option. Even the CCTV footage was ignored to not accuse him of the crime by the IO.
Not only in #TraunTejPal case, there are various other HC and SC Judgments where it can be found that the IO intentionally avoids or hide the evidence which are in favor of the justice for the accused.
Most of the #WomenActivist are well known advocates or know the law very well that the confession Law where the confession under threat or promise can’t he used to term guilty to a person (attached). Still, they hide the fact & spread #WrongNarrative intentionally that the male accused accepted the crime on an apology letter, so he should be punished, where even the women herself telling multiple times via email or whatsapp message that the accused has not accepted the crime in his apology Letter.
In such case what is the fault of the Judge?
Why #JudgeShaming & hostage of Justice System is justified?
We hereby pray that this court must take note of all of the above and must take a very strong action against such Women Activists for Attacking the Judge.
the Judge’s Chair and till date none has been punished .
We would bring to your notice that during making the Law, these #WomenActivist group termed Rape as #HeinousCrime, hence Special Evidence Act, increase punishment, even up to #HangToDeath, was made. Though, as per them, a cheerful victim just after the alleged incident, is a fact that judge should have ignored.
Then why the Rape Law should be termed as a #HeniousCrime?
Why to give Life Term/Death Sentence/Rigorous Imprisonment under this law?
We pray that then this court must direct the law makers to review and amend the current law, on immediate basis.
Prayer:
We pray that the Hon’ble Supreme Court must form an action committee to investigate the social media, Print Media and Electronic Media content to identify the offensive, disrespectful, #JudgeShaming messages/content and submit the report to itself within 15 days.
Based on the report, this court must take sumo-moto contempt action against those involved in #JudgeShaming & trying to take Justice System as a Hostage, as per their whims and fancies.
Guidelines to be issued for Criminal Investigation immediately. Two IOs must be assigned, where:
One IO is responsible to present the investigation & evidence from complainant side
Other IO is responsible to present the investigation & evidence from accused side
Strict Punishment to IO, who, conveniently and intentionally avoids or hides or destroys the evidence which are material for the case.
Additionally, the court may be pleased to issue to the notice to law makers that when woman can behave normal & cheerful after claim of Rape, why should it be termed as a #HeinousCrime and why should there be any increase on the punishment, as amended in Criminal Amendment Act 2013?
Any other or suitable order this court deems fit/suitable to stop the #JudgeShaming & hostage of Justice System by any group/persons.
Thanking you and seek your kind action at the earliest.
Yours Truly,
Swarup Sarkar
A Founder Member of Men Well Fare Trust (MWT).
(#MWT a self-supported, self-volunteered group working for welfare of Men & running helpline for Men jointly with other brother NGOs, Free of cost).
Open Letter to Chief Justice of India: #JudgeShaming & Hostage of Justice are birth right of #WomenActivist?https://t.co/45Qs690P8e Strongly believe Principal of Natural Justice: A person innocent till proven guilty by competent Court. This Principal to be protected at any cost. pic.twitter.com/2L7stuFa2q
