झूठे मामलों में फंसाकर महिलायें करती मर्दों पर अत्याचार, खुदकुशी के आँकड़...

झूठे मामलों में फंसाकर महिलायें करती मर्दों पर अत्याचार, खुदकुशी के आँकड़े देख रह जाओगे हैरान ~ India News #JhalkoIndianews #Jhalko #Men_Commition #DelhiNCR #Purush_aayog #पुरुष_आयोग Jhalko India News Channel : (झलको इंडिया न्यूज़ चैनल को सब्सक्राइब करें).

Guzara Bhatta Song by HONEY CHOURASIA !

“Guzara Bhatta Song by HONEY CHOURASIA ”

Sung by HONEY CHOURASIA & SHIVANGI KELUT Directed by " HONEY CHOURASIA " Featuring MANAV DUA, PRIYA CHABRA, ADV. A.P SINGH, SIKKA, HONEY CHOURASIA exclusively on Sonotek Punjabi.

In Name of #GuzaraBhatta Wives are doing extortion of Money from Husbands as per wish & whim supported by Lawmakers

@MinistryWCD

. Feminist gang cry for #Patriarchy but refused to #LiberateMen from Provider Role-Why? #HoneyChourasia brings a song for awareness !

God had given two hand, Two Leg & one Brian to both Men & Women ! Why to force Husband for your #GuzaraBhatta ?

Be Self dependent than became a Burden on Husband & Country Too!

Say no to #GuzaraBhatta !

Jai Bhim TV 24x7 : दिवाली की पूर्व संध्या पर #HoneyChourasia #GuzaraBhatta का गाना होगा रिलीज़https://t.co/5cBWKwlSlg#JaiBhimTV24x7 #India #Hapur #CRPC125 #SIF @swarup1972 @MenWelfare @TheAmitLakhani @Jhakasbachha @sif_india @BJP4UP @BJP4MP @PMOIndia @MinistryWCD @PMOIndia

— Jai Bhim TV 24x7 (@JaiBhimTV_24x7) November 2, 2021

"Guzara Bhatta" - MWT talks to Honey Chourasia https://t.co/a3l2KoxYa3 via @YouTube
MWT chats with the Director, Singer, Honey Chourasia @honey_chaurasia about his journey for new song, "Guzara Bhatta". Must watch & Share for awareness #GuzaraBhattaSong !!

— SwarupSarkar (@swarup1972) November 2, 2021

Rubaru with Mr. Suhaib Ilyasi (Producer & Director) - Shaadi, Dahej & Gangster (Hindi Movie)

Rubaru with Mr. Suhaib Ilyasi (Director & Producer - Hindi Movie, "Shaadi, Dahej & Gangster") Synopsis: Jignesh Bhai Patel (Alok Nath) is a billionaire NRI businessman living in London with his wife Sudha (Reema Lagoo) and son Harsh. Their household is highly patriarchal and strictly follows Indian traditions. Harsh decides to marry a girl from India, unaware of the conspiracy set by his prospective in-laws, Deepak Tijori and Supriya Karnik. Will an entire gang in the guise of the ‘bride’ and her relatives bring his doom? Starring: Harsh Nagar, Alok Nath, Farida Jalal, Reema Lagoo, Deepak Tijori, Deepraj Rana, Supriya Karnik Directed By: Suhaib Ilyasi Amit Lakhani, a well known Men's Rights Activist and President of Men Welfare Trust (Registered NGO), part of Save Indian Family (SIF) Movement, brings to you, this interview with the man behind this movie on the misuse of dowry harassment law.

Shaadi , Dahej and Gangster Movie Review : Courtroom drama and melodious Songs that keeps you on edge .

Shaadi , Dahej and Gangster Movie Review : Rating 4.5 out of 5.

Shaadi , Dahej and Gangster released on OTT platform of Shemaroo on 30th July ,2021.

 

The film is written and directed by none other than former TV anchor Mr. Shuyab  who used to be a House Hold name in India for his famous crime show "India’s Most Wanted”.

 

Marriage Dowry and Gangster
A movie, a view to #misandrc society & gender biased laws .. #ShaadiDahejNGangster Watch now on #ShemarooMe app: https://t.co/rdMuof8AHG#ReemaLagoo #AlokNath #HarshNagar #FaridaJalal #DeepakTijari #SupriyaKarnik #AaliyaProductions pic.twitter.com/Te9GhXtLuL

— Shemaroo (@ShemarooEnt) July 31, 2021

The film makes for a gripping watch with a crisp runtime and top-notch performances by veteran actors like Farida Jalal , Deepak Tijori , Alok Naath , Reema Lagoo , Supriya Karnik , Zarina Wahab , Anjan Srivastav , Deepraj Raana, Legendary Ghulam Ali khan along with young Harsh Nagar , Shrishti Gautam  .

 

The film had wonder full melodious songs by Sonu Nigam , Sunidhi Chouhan , Shaan and Legendary Ghulam Ali Khan .

 

Surprise package Mr. Suhaib  as actor too in the film, it seems he is Back in action once again after almost a decade.

 

Start with a court room seen – where Public prosecutors make wild allegation and emotional argument with full of Misandry in front of lady Judge to convict a NRI husband family with IPC 498A, with commonly known as anti-dowry law or Dahej in India.

 

Within few seconds the accused advocate exposes his open lie in court with humor at best and viewers came to know a false dowry case had been filed, but they don’t know how, why and when such cases had been filed.

 

Then the accused advocate present Husband side of story with flash back from start.

 

A NRI family wants to get married their son with Indian girl, start searching bride. Match makers bring a proposal for them and during visit to the girl’s family home, the girl’s mother refused to allow meeting of boy and girl before marriage as per their traditional values.

 

This impressed the NRI family. During conversation girl’s mother asked about Dowry demand, on which the NRI family clearly said forget about any dowry demand and even all marriage cost will be borne by groom’s family.

 

They ignore many warning signs of girl’s family on blind faith and go ahead for marriage. After marriage-once a child bore out of wedlock- the girl’s mother along with an advocate cum property dealer gang up with Police officer to snatch highly valued land worth of 200 crores of NRI family which they bought for build up a Temple, Hospital, schools about 10 years back.

 

When NRI family refused to surrender on blackmailing and extortion, girl’s mother plan to file IPC 498A cases, which commonly known as Anti Dowry law or anti Dahej law in India.  NRI family got arrested and sends to jail.

Media and court trails begin.

 

While packing in various standpoints to showcase the flash back story, the screenplay also highlights how media and media trials take over a criminal case of this nature.

 

During trail and before final order passed: Why bring tears on the lady judge’s eyes?

 

 

 

Why lady judge have to say “Supreme court says there is no Law which can allow commonsense to be kept at cold storage”?

Does law allowed to judge really to deliver the justice?

 

To find such un-answered question, you have to watch the film.

 

Overall, Shaadi , Dahej and Gangstar is an audacious effort. It is a relevant film that tackles a complex issue of grossly abused Dowry Law in India which once supreme court of India also to be termed as unleash legal Terrorism if such abuse of law not stopped. The final verdict of the movie declares that will engage, inform and open up debates.

 

The most important part of the movie at end with the long list of thanks and acknowledgement mentioned large number of NGO , Activist and Helpline numbers for false accused victim to reach out for help , shows the director and production team had spent enough time and research for the film to create a much needed awareness to large public .

 

 

Our overall rating is 4.5 out of 5 and recommended to must watch irrespective of your age, family back ground ,  marital status and if you are a already victim of false dowry cases, you will not be disappointed even to watch the same 2 or 3 times too.

Watch now online Movie Shaadi , Dahej and Gangster at #ShemarooMe . ( Click to Subscribe Link ) 

TMC MP Nusrat Jahan's new law of Marriage and Divorce @JM News

A Message by MWT Volunteers : #HappyFathersDay

Open Letter to Chief Justice of India: #JudgeShaming & Hostage of Justice are birth right of #WomenActivist?

To, 

The Honorable Chief Justice of India, 

Supreme Court of India New Delhi, India. 

Hon’ble Chief Justice of India, 

We strongly believe in the Principle of Natural Justice, that a person is innocent till proven guilty by competent Court. This Principle needs to be protected at every cost. 

Those who violate it by doing accused naming/shaming, #JudgeShaming, #JudiciaryShaming via social media must be punished strongly. 

Every accused has the right to have a fair trial in criminal Justice system (even in cases like that of Mumbai Terror attacks by Kasab & other convicts, this court ensured Fair Trail). That’s the protection granted by the Constitution of India and also by Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). 

We write to you in reference to the recent judgment of #TarunTejpal case. The Women Activists across the country used every tool from the “book of naming & shaming” to run smear campaigns against the Accused, many violating the court orders of no media reporting. That was all through the trial period. But once the Judgment is out and the accused was found “not guilty”, the same women activists have now directed their abusive verbal firing against the presiding judicial officer herself. 

Many Women Activists & Journalists have termed the individual judge as regressive mindset & questioning her credibility. It is pertinent to mention that while a judgment can always be appealed against legally and there are proper guidelines from the Hon’ble Supreme Court on what amounts of questioning a judgment as a “freedom of speech” and what amounts as “contempt of court”, these Women Activists & Journalists are just not abusing the judgment, but the Judge herself now. Does this not amount to offence in India? 

Will the Hon’ble Supreme Court step-in to save the term “Hon’ble” for Judges? If the same defamation, online abuse is not contempt of court – then what for contempt of Court exists in our Law book?

We have witnessed several cases, where Lower court convicted or acquitted a person depending upon merits of the case & then also subsequently High Court & Supreme Court reversed the Judgments. There have been even instance of the Superior courts questioning the application of Judicial principals of the lower court judgments, but there too, the dignity of the presiding officer is not attacked. Is this attack allowed to the outside world, specially to Women Activists? 

If we go through various High Courts & Supreme Court judgments, number of Lower court judgments u/s IPC 375, 354, 498A were reversed as Lower Courts wrongly convicted accused in approximately than 70% of these cases. In such cases, no one questioned the Lower court Judge’s creditability or termed them as regressive mindset or made sarcastic statements equivalent to taunting the judge itself.

Even simple bail applications are rejected in routine manner in the Lower Courts and the person has to reach upto High Court or Supreme Court only to get his merits noticed to secure the Bail. The lower court Judges are already under humungous pressure to convict a MALE accused on mere allegations due to #MediaTrails and in very few cases they are able to conclude fare trails. 

Result is, we see that in number of Judgments in HC or SC even in bail application, where the judgment needs to be completely reversed. 

Present case at Hand: 

A woman termed a Man ‘Rapist’ during a Lift journey of a 5-star Hotel during a company event – which is well covered with multiple CCTVs. It was a perfect case, where from the CCTV footage itself Police could have closed the case with B-report and should have initiated CrPC 182 (Attached court observations). 

It could have saved so many years of just not the Judicial System / Court itself but would have also given more time to “media convicted” accused to save his little dignity, if not his whole life. But due to the media trial & hostage of Justice by #WomenActivist group, the Investigating Officer was forced to work in a biased manner. 

IO was forced to even manipulate the critical evidence and was forced to make more than 3000 pages “one sided” chargesheet with more than 150 witnesses, prosecutrix email/whatsapp etc. just to ensure to conviction the accused. Now for the Man as an accused, only option left to prove his innocence was the fact that women refused to go for medical examination / DNA Test and since it was not possible to find truth via medical test or forensic test, had to bring on record the hiding of material facts, coming to court with unclean hand sand contradictory statements of the Prosecutrix. 

In the Judgment, nowhere it has been claimed by the Judge that the women’s statement not creditable because of her character. Women Activists are questioning the discussion about unclean hands of victim in the judgment, but if that defense is also taken away from an accused, why to have CrPC or CPC or the Courts itself? 

Because Women Activists run the law and the country, Right? 

On mere allegation – it will be justified to term a person as guilty? 

Will this be termed as fair trial? 

A person is innocent till proven guilty, but for #WomenActivist group convicting a male accused even before a court trial begins, is a habit. This has happened in almost all the cases involving gender issue, which few women activists use as a matter of their profit. But the judiciary has maintained utter silence and has never taken any action against this. 

But now, a new narrative is being established by these #WomenActivists that a male is termed guilty even when he proves his innocence in the Court. Is this justified & fair in a Criminal Justice system? 

But #WomenActivist intentionally mislead people that it was victim shaming to justify their #JudgeShaming & attack on the Judge. They intentionally ignore the merits and fact and the judicial application of the mind to acquit the accused. 

The male accused and his advocate had to prove the contradiction, hiding of fact and unclean hands of the prosecutrix – as there is no other option. Even the CCTV footage was ignored to not accuse him of the crime by the IO. 

Not only in #TraunTejPal case, there are various other HC and SC Judgments where it can be found that the IO intentionally avoids or hide the evidence which are in favor of the justice for the accused. 

Most of the #WomenActivist are well known advocates or know the law very well that the confession Law where the confession under threat or promise can’t he used to term guilty to a person (attached). Still, they hide the fact & spread #WrongNarrative intentionally that the male accused accepted the crime on an apology letter, so he should be punished, where even the women herself telling multiple times via email or whatsapp message that the accused has not accepted the crime in his apology Letter.

In such case what is the fault of the Judge? Why #JudgeShaming & hostage of Justice System is justified? 

We hereby pray that this court must take note of all of the above and must take a very strong action against such Women Activists for Attacking the Judge. the Judge’s Chair and till date none has been punished . 

We would bring to your notice that during making the Law, these #WomenActivist group termed Rape as #HeinousCrime, hence Special Evidence Act, increase punishment, even up to #HangToDeath, was made. Though, as per them, a cheerful victim just after the alleged incident, is a fact that judge should have ignored. 

Then why the Rape Law should be termed as a #HeniousCrime? 

Why to give Life Term/Death Sentence/Rigorous Imprisonment under this law? 

We pray that then this court must direct the law makers to review and amend the current law, on immediate basis. 

 Prayer: 

• We pray that the Hon’ble Supreme Court must form an action committee to investigate the social media, Print Media and Electronic Media content to identify the offensive, disrespectful, #JudgeShaming messages/content and submit the report to itself within 15 days. 
• Based on the report, this court must take sumo-moto contempt action against those involved in #JudgeShaming & trying to take Justice System as a Hostage, as per their whims and fancies. 

• Guidelines to be issued for Criminal Investigation immediately. Two IOs must be assigned, where: 

• One IO is responsible to present the investigation & evidence from complainant side 
• Other IO is responsible to present the investigation & evidence from accused side 
• Strict Punishment to IO, who, conveniently and intentionally avoids or hides or destroys the evidence which are material for the case. 

• Additionally, the court may be pleased to issue to the notice to law makers that when woman can behave normal & cheerful after claim of Rape, why should it be termed as a #HeinousCrime and why should there be any increase on the punishment, as amended in Criminal Amendment Act 2013? 

• Any other or suitable order this court deems fit/suitable to stop the #JudgeShaming & hostage of Justice System by any group/persons. Thanking you and seek your kind action at the earliest. 

Yours Truly, 

Swarup Sarkar 

A Founder Member of Men Well Fare Trust (MWT). 

(#MWT a self-supported, self-volunteered group working for welfare of Men & running helpline for Men jointly with other brother NGOs, Free of cost).

Open Letter to Chief Justice of India: #JudgeShaming & Hostage of Justice are birth right of #WomenActivist?https://t.co/45Qs690P8e
Strongly believe Principal of Natural Justice: A person innocent till proven guilty by competent Court. This Principal to be protected at any cost. pic.twitter.com/2L7stuFa2q

— SwarupSarkar (@swarup1972) May 30, 2021

Wellbeing of Men - A Panel discussion on International Men's Day

Discussing live with Swarup Sarkar on International Men's Day and Purush...

Men Welfare Trust Activities 2018 19

Gender Neutral Law & Policy: Irrespective of Caste , Religion or Sex

Since independence many political party Formed Government, made multiple Laws / Policy  by misuse/abuse the provision of our Constitution Article 15 (3) & (4) .

As we witness Unfair law or Policy in the name of caste, religion or gender, had never bring fairness in society, it destroyed the harmony in society, result violence , crime increasing. Respect to each others, trust to each others had reached to lowest level in India.   

Political party busy to work out the policy or law keeping in mind there Vote Bank only and keep making new law which leads to #LegalTerrorism only and Judiciary had been became nightmare , overburdened unnecessarily for same relief multiple cases filed and huge fake cases filed every day.

We propose the below Changes for A dream Country to bring real harmony and equality in Society :

National Policy of India ( NPI) : ( To be updated ) 

Constitution Amended : 

1. Article 15 (3) should read as  : Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any special provision for economic Backward person irrespective of their caste , religion or gender.  Article 15 (3) & Article 15 (4) to be merged . 

2. Article 51(A) (e) should read as : to promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood among  all the people of India transcending religious, linguistic and regional or sectional diversities; to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of any Person.

Classification of Citizen on Basis of Economic Ground only : 

a. Below Poverty ( Yearly income per person in family : From XXXX to XXXX)

b. Poor : ( Yearly Income per person in family : from XXXX to XXXX) 

c. Middle  : ( Yearly Income per person in Family : from XXXX to XXX).

d. Rich : (Yearly Income per person in family: form XXXX to XXXX)

e. Supper Rich ( Yearly Income per person in family above : XXXX)

Criminal Law Amended ( CRPC ) :

1. CRPC..XXXX: After complete the Trail of any Criminal offence the judges should be bound to order under 3- category:

a. The accused had been found Guilty behind reasonable dought - Punishment to accused as per IPC Law and compensations to complainant. 

b. The accused had been acquitted on benefit of dought or prosecution had failed to prove his guilty : Accused should be compensated .

c. Accused had proved beyond reasonable dought the compliant was filed against him was false or malafied intention  by complainant : Punishment to complainant same as per IPC case filed and compensations to accused.

IPC LAW Amended : 

1. In any law the word Men or Women to be replaced by Person , Husband and wife to be replaced by spouse , He and She should be replaced by word "he or she".

Judaical adjournments :

1. More than 3- adjournments should not be allowed to either complainant or accused .  

Jury System for Civil Laws and petty crime: 

1. Establish Jury System for Civil Laws offence and petty crime.

Income Tax Policy :

1. Personnel Income tax : To be abolished ( as we already paying tax on purchase goods and services). 2. Corporate Taxes : Should be maximum 20 % ( To make India attractive for Investment) .

Shelter Home for Men and Women :

1. Every state should establish one Shelter Home for Men and Women separately, maximum stay up to 6 months .

Government Subsidies Canteen for Men and Women : 

1. Every Town or Village should have at least one subsidies canteen for Food should be established .

Pre-neptual Agreement for Marriage : 

 1. Those are interested to go for pre-neptual Agreement before maraige, it should be legalized in all Marriage related laws , to avoid multiple litigation and hassel free Divorce Process.


We would request to all, to send your suggestions  to summaries and update accordingly.

Video presentation of SIF - Hyderabad in 10th National Conference

Domestic Violence Against Men - Short Film

Don't get fooled by #MeToo gang . #SpeakUpMan to Stop #MeToo4Publicity

Unfair Law or Policy can't bring any Fairness in Society .There is No Law in India to Punish any Girls or Women who Rape, Molest Man, as the law is not Gender Neutral . So , when a Man try to say his assault , instead of consider him as Victim , he himself had been termed as Molester , Rapist. More than 35 country have gender neutral Work Place Harassment LAW , but in India its does not Protect Men or women when the assault done by Women. Result all Rapist Women are moving freely in India , as the same not crime for them in India.

Don't get fooled by #MeToo gang . #SpeakUpMan to Stop abuse of Men and Demand Gender Neutral law. If Women do not do such crime , why they afraid for Gender neutral Law?

#CrimeByWomen : युवती ने कपड़े फाड़कर झूठे आरोप में फंसाने की धमकी दी थीhttps://t.co/pAgUTM9Ms2
जूहिता ने कपड़े फाड़ने और अश्लील हरकत करने का आरोप लगाते हुए एफआईआर दर्ज कराने की धमकी दी। लांछन से परेशान होकर आंनद ने सुसाइड कर लिया। #UnfairLaw like #Rape making Men life Hell !

— SwarupSarkar (@swarup1972) August 6, 2020

Pool Result : Terming Husband a Rapist via Marital Rape Law

Question for Married Men only : Would you have got married to your present wife ,knowing that she can term You a Rapist ? #MaritalRape

— SwarupSarkar (@swarup1972) August 29, 2017