Wednesday, 23 January 2013

Justice Verma Report Biased to protect the Rapist women

The Justice Verma Reports put blame to every institution start from police, citizen of India, army, politicians left, right and center, except the Judiciary. 

He had totally failed to make Judges responsible for delay in judgements and unable to give justice UN-biased way , result the real victim avoid to go to court for justice  but innocent people dragged in court in false and fabricated cases years together by greedy , money minded people , who use the law as extortion tool , which even Supreme court termed as "Legal Terrorism " in the cases of 498A.

The double standard of Justice Verma Committe exposed and contracted statement made in Workplace harassment bill demanding through  recommendation that the said provision be deleted:
(l) Action in relation to False or Malicious Complaints or Giving of False Evidence:
The present Section 14 of the Sexual Harassment Bill appears to be a provision which is liable to misuse.

So, on the ground of "Misuse" they want the same to be deleted, but on the other hand there are several LAW and SC judgments mentioned "Misuse" of any provision of LAW is not a ground for scrap or delete a LAW.

Unable to understand why they are in such double standard and contracted view expressed.

The above view itself confirms beyond reasonable dought the committee itself had caught red handed with their own ill intention logic towards the "Misuse" of  Law is valid ground applicable to all LAW and the sufficient care should be taken to avoid the "Misuse of LAW".

The most surprising Justice Verma Reports refuse to acknowledge the need of make the Rape law Gender Neutral, which is followed by all over the world. He gives enough examples of international LAW and Justice system , but we unable to understand what restrict him to accept the LAW commission Reports to make the Rape LAW gender Neutral?

Why he wants to protect the Rapist women of India?

If women do not do the rape they will not be Punished, but why they afraid to accept the same?

We had given enough examples the women rape child , rape on men and then kill them , cut in 11pics , 17 pics , but he totally ignored the same in IPC 375.

In case of under age child sex cases : They also conveniently given the exemption to women , where we witness so many international judgements when women had been punished for rape of child.

7. Section 375 shall be replaced as suggested below by Justice Verma Committee:

Section 375: Rape
375. A man is said to commit rape if he—
(a) penetrates the vagina or anus or urethra of a person with—
(i) any part of his body including his penis or,
(ii) any object manipulated by him, except where such penetration is carried out for
proper hygienic or medical purposes; or,
(b) manipulates any part of the body of a person so as to cause penetration of the vagina
or anus or urethra of another person; or,
(c) engages in “cunnilingus” or “fellatio”,
under the circumstances falling under any of the following six descriptions:—
Firstly.—Against the person’s will; or,
Secondly.— Without the person’s consent; or,
Thirdly, With the person’s consent, where such consent has been obtained by putting the
person, or any other person in whom the person is interested, in fear of death or of hurt;
Fourthly.— With the person’s consent, when the man induces the person to consent to
the relevant act by impersonating another man to whom the victim would have
otherwise knowingly consented to; or,
Fifthly, With the person’s consent, when at the time of giving such consent, by reason of
unsoundness of mind or intoxication or the administration by the man personally or
through another of any stupefying or unwholesome substance, the person is unable to
understand the nature and consequences of the action to which he/she gives consent; or,
Sixthly, When the person is unable to communicate consent either express or impliedly.
Explanation I.— For the purposes of this section, “penetration” means penetration of the
vagina, anus or urethra to any extent.
Explanation II.—For the purposes of this section, “vagina” shall also include labia
Explanation III: Consent will not be presumed in the event of an existing marital
relationship between the complainant and the accused.
Explanation IV. - Consent means an unequivocal voluntary agreement when the person
by words, gestures or any form of non-verbal communication, communicates
willingness to participate in the specific act.

Provided that, a person who does not offer actual physical resistance to the act of
penetration is not by reason only of that fact, to be regarded as consenting to the sexual

12. A new Section 376B defining and punishing rape of an underage person shall
be added:
Section 376B(1): Rape of an underage person: If a man has sexual intercourse with a
person below sixteen years1 of age with or without that person’s consent, he shall be
rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than ten years, but which may
extend to imprisonment for life.

Provided that the existence of a marital relationship between the accused and the
underage person shall not be a valid defence.

Explanation: For the purposes of this section, sexual intercourse shall mean any of the
acts specified in Section 375 (a) to (c).

From the above it is clear Justice Verma committee reports not only biased , it had promoted the hidden agenda of some male hater women organizations who wants to protect the "Rapist women " of India.
The word "Men" should be replaced by the word "Person" as recommended by Law commission . If women do not do rape they will not not be punished , but protection of Rapist women is not all acceptable.

The Verma Committee is totally silent to plug the loop whole of Indian rape law :

We have some skewed definition of  r@pe. After living for two years or so as live-in-partners and sleeping in  the same bed, to accuse the male partner of r@pe if he refused to marry is  the height absurdity. And police recording it as r@pe the culmination of stupidity. Such stupid definition no country all over the world have. First need to plug this loop hole first or cry for rape is increasing and increasing .

The most dangerous is 2. Amendment to Section 114A , where the women verbal statement is sufficient to term any Tom/Dick/harry is Rapist.

This must be deleted or there will be promotion of injustice and many innocent people will be convected , as we all know women does not born in Raja Harish Chandra Family ( never lie).

For section 114A of the Evidence Act, the following section shall be substituted,

‘114A. (1) In a prosecution for rape under sub-section (2) of section 376 or for gang rape
under Section 376C of the Indian Penal Code, where sexual intercourse by the accused is
proved and the question is whether it was without the consent of the other person
alleged to have been raped and such other person states in his/her evidence before the
court that she or he did not consent, the court shall presume that she or he did not
Explanation.—In this section “sexual intercourse” shall mean any of the acts mentioned
in clauses (a) to (c) of section 375 of the Indian Penal Code.

So, my humble request , law should not be on emotion and crime does not have any sex, caste or religion , so the first priority the law should be gender neutral. If women do not do rape , they will not be punished, but outright say, women do not do rape or sexual assault, is wrong and such mindset in law making process will increase the crime in society.

Our Proposal : 

If you really want the same should not be misused left ,right and center the way in 498A/DV act the word relative misused .
Be ready the Rape statistics will be double in next two years and it will became another extortion, blackmailing and easy money earning business for all Advocate, Police and greedy people.

Summary of our Recommendations and Request to meet your MP/MLA/Ministers and demand:

1)    Make Rape Law Gender Neutral as in other countries of the globe
2)    Relationship cheating cases should not be allowed to be converted into rape cases which suck the scare resources from genuine rape cases.
3)    False complaints of Rape cases, should be punished severely, so that genuine cases like ‘Nirbhaya’, gets justice.
4)    Introduce the much required police reforms to increase conviction rates of rape cases
5)    Introduce the much required judicial reforms for speedier justice and to increase conviction rates of rape cases.

·        All references to “Man” or “Woman” must be replaced with the word “Person” or “Whosoever”
·        All references to “His” or “Her” to be must be replaced with the word “His or Her”
·        All references to  “He” or  “She” must be replaced with the word “He or She”
·        All references to the word ‘Husband” or “Wife” must be replaced with the word “Spouse”

Live-in-relationship or marriage disputes should not be be included in the Sexual Assault as the same already covered under Domestic Violence act.

Danger for Future Child & Men :

Justice Verma Committee had seen only one side of the coin with biased view , though they give big lecture of international law and Justice system, but failed to identify the real problem and totally keep blind eye of suffering of Men and child in the hand of  "Rapist women" along with "False/fabricated Rape" cases.

A man or child can't be file rape case against women , let she rape you every day and then cut your body in 11 or 17 pieces.

The final punch :

Indian Woman : Murder any man and demand immunity under IPC 100 saying he was trying to rape me. don't forgot to Thank

Must read : 

When a women rape a man it called Love as per LAW, Society and media..right?

1 comment:

Anonymous said...