Monday, 12 May 2014

What Indian men should learn and act from Ankit Tiwari Rape case?

From the various news, understand Mr. Ankit Tiwari termed as Rapist by a woman, who realized he was not keen on marrying her, she lodged a police complaint. She is a divorcee with an eight-year-old daughter. He had been also denied bail and send to Jail in the name of investigation under process. 

Rape accused Bollywood singer Ankit Tiwariremanded to police custody till May 12

The Versova Police, on Friday, recorded the statements of ten persons in connection with the allegation of rape levelled against Bollywood singer Ankit Tiwari (24) by a 28-year-old woman.

Ankit was arrested on Thursday and produced in Andheri metropolitan court, which remanded him in police custody till May 12. He had allegedly raped the victim after forcing her to consume alcohol at her sister's birthday party on July 21 last year. The party was held at the victim's flat in Andheri. The ten, whose statements were recorded on Friday, were those that had attended the party.

After allegedly getting her drunk, Ankit took her to the bedroom and raped her. After the incident, he reportedly promised to marry her, which he never did. But, both of them continued to be in touch with each other.

Last August, when Ankit went to the victim's house, she and her female friend, who was present there, raised the issue of marriage. He then reportedly applied 'sindhur' on her forehead in front of the family deity's photo. However, he declined to register the marriage. When the woman realised he was not keen on marrying her, she lodged a police complaint.

She is a divorcee with an eight-year-old daughter.

"The victim has alleged that a few months ago when she insisted on marriage Ankit threatened to circulate obscene videos of her. She also said Ankit had been aware of her past before they got into a relationship" said police inspector Subhash Vele of Versova station.

"We have seized Ankit's mobile phone and are taking the help of the cyber crime cell to ascertain whether he had indeed recorded any obscene videos of the victim and had deleted it later," Vele said.

However, during interrogation Ankit told the police that he was in a relationship with the victim but that she had never told him about her previous marriage or her daughter.

According to the police, the complainant, who is an event manager and also the president of a private firm, had got divorce from her husband a few years ago.

Ankit's elder brother, Ankur, who was also arrested on Thursday for alleged criminal intimidation, was released on bail on surety of Rs 15,000.

Now just reverse the situation, Divorced men with 8 years old child make relationship with unmarried women and after that if the women refuse to marry the man, will you term the same as rape?

Case filed against Aishwarya Rai Bachchan by alleged ex ...  but the same is not breaking news , it found only few lines in some media gossip pages and will never come to limelight.

Niroshan Devapriya, a Sri Lankan man, who claims to be Aishwarya Rai Bachchan’s former lover, has filed a complaint against the 40-year-old actor, accusing her of causing him mental stress by marrying Abhishek Bachchan in 2007.

We know every one will term it unfair the case filed against Aishwarya Rai or even the man himself will be booked under IPC354 for stalking her, as a Man can’t file a Rape case against any women in India if she refuse to marry a man, if that had been the law, at least 10times more women had been termed as rapist in India.

When a women rape a man it called Love as per LAW, Society and media..right? 

Many men who demanded strong Rape LAW earlier or termed other men as wife abusers, today paying price for their blindness and support to misuse of LAW without knowing the hard reality.

Recently in  Indore  "SIF-Hope for Men" seminar,  came to Know one case, where  the women had 15 years old child, but at the time of marriage , she told him , the child is her brother !!!! The Guy goes ahead with marriage, without even given a second thought and after 6- months he came to know this is her Third marriage and the Child is not her brother it was her own child from earlier marriage. The woman is even about 8 years older than the Young guy.

They are legally married for 3- Years but no consumption of marriage till date and when husband bring her ALL past evidence and asked why she lied him before marriage, she filed 498A dowry harassment cases. She made big drama in front of men’s office, in front of men’s parent house, tried to forcefully enter in his parent’s home, though they used to stay in separate house. Now she is demanding 50 lacks and the House which husband purchased from his own hard earned money along with Bank Loan and paying EMI.

In another case a 22 year guys was forced to marry with a 28 years women, as she filed rape cases, but after 1 year now the same women filed a dowry case not against the guy, implicated his age old parents and sisters also.
Now, if you marry such women, you will get 498A after wards and if you do not marry, you will be termed as Rapist, which one as a man has to prefer?
I had always cautioned in SIF, keep safe distance form such Women, and do not fall in their trap of fake tears that how bad was their Husbands, as they are master to get sympathy from other men, from society or from Judiciary. They had a strong believe, in India they can do any crime, they can cheat any one, neither law nor Police/court have any courage to punish them.
Such women and her supporters, know very well how Indian law, media, Common men, will always support her irrespective she is right or wrong, it happened only in India, such women can have multiple physical relation with men without marriage, she can refuse to marry any men as per her wish, but if any men dare to refuse to marry her, he will be termed as rapist.

The question to be asked , is this case Mr. Ankur Tiwari rape the women or the Women had raped Mr. Ankur Tiwari by hiding her past ?

As per LAW , the verbal statement of women to be taken as true , not the statement of Ankur Tiwari. 

As we predicted at the time of Justice Verma committee reports, Many More Ankur Tiwari will be termed as rapist very soon, as they all ignored our caution when the biased, unfair anti-rape law was made, preferred to sleep with the thinking, in their life time the chances of getting a rape cases is Zero, without knowing the LAW had been tampered in such a way, today any women can term you a rapist without any evidence, only her verbal statement is sufficient to send you behind the bar.

So, Mr. Ankur Tiwari and future men like him, must thanks to Justice Verma to award you a Rapist tag for rest of the life.

But many SIF members will keep meeting with their MP/Law Makers and demand to amend the Present biased, unfair anit- rape law with a strong Punishment clause for misuse of law .

Our Proposal : 

If you really want the same should not be misused left ,right and center the way in 498A/DV act the word relative misused .
Be ready the Rape statistics will be double in next two years and it will became another extortion, blackmailing and easy money earning business for all Advocate, Police and greedy people.

Summary of our Recommendations and Request to meet your MP/MLA/Ministers and demand:
1)    Make Rape Law Gender Neutral as in other countries of the globe
2)    Relationship cheating cases should not be allowed to be converted into rape cases which suck the scare resources from genuine rape cases.
3)    False complaints of Rape cases should be punished severely, so that genuine cases like ‘Nirbhaya’, gets justice.
4)    Introduce the much required police reforms to increase conviction rates of rape cases
5)    Introduce the much required judicial reforms for speedier justice and to increase conviction rates of rape cases.

·        All references to “Man” or “Woman” must be replaced with the word “Person” or “Whosoever”
·        All references to “His” or “Her” to be must be replaced with the word “His or Her”
·        All references to  “He” or  “She” must be replaced with the word “He or She”
·        All references to the word ‘Husband” or “Wife” must be replaced with the word “Spouse”

Live-in-relationship or marriage disputes should not be included in the Sexual Assault/rape cases,  as the same already covered under Domestic Violence act.

No comments: