Today is the 5th
time SC Judges once again recognized the misuse of Law 498A, but what SC had
been done? Have they really interested to protect the Live and liberty of
Indian Men, which is back bone of Indian Constitution and its responsibility
was assigned to SC to protect for every citizen, irrespective of their caste,
religion or sex (gender).
Court Says :
It is propounded in a court of law that the penal provision is abused to an unimaginable extent, for in a cruel, ruthless and totally revengeful manner, the young, old and relatives residing at distant places having no involvement with the incident, if any, are roped in. Thus, the abuse of the penal provision has vertically risen. When the implementation of law is abused by the law enforcing agency, the legislature introduces a protective provision as regards arrest. Needless to say, the courts have ample power to grant pre-arrest bail or popularly called anticipatory bail and even to quash the criminal proceeding totally to stabilize the lawful balance because no court of law remotely conceives of a war between the two sexes. The courts remain constantly alive to the situation that though no war takes place, yet neither anger nor vendetta of the aggrieved section should take an advantage of the legal provision and harass the other side with influence or espousing the principle of sympathy.
SC 3-bench Judge,
acknowledge the Misuses of Law once again, but as solution says AB is available,
but failed to understand the getting AB is not some thin ordering Pizza or a
cup of tea. When abuse the power of
arrest happens, do you think Police is fool to give the time the person to go
for Court to apply for AB? Who will stop the extortion, Blackmailing happen in
court , police station in the name of AB ?
Solution given by SC: Training
to Police personals. What a Solution, as last 50 years no training was given to
them in spite so many SC guidelines and Judgments.
SC: Solution to stop abuse of arrest is Training. Really ? |
In spite of having Blackmailing
and extortion Law , Government make special law 498A , which even term mental cruelty
to wives as criminal offence ( which all over country deal by gender neutral Civil Law ).
But any mental cruelty by wives to Husband is not crime in India. Such was the Unfair law in this country, where even silence of any Husband or his long relative members can be termed as criminal and as its non-bailable offence , the person can be put in Jail irrespective the allegation latter found true or false.
One Have to understand why
Rajesh Sharma Judgment was have to come in picture to form Family Well fare Committee
to verify 498A complaint, before refer to court or Police.
Advocates/Judges/Government may say to abuse arrest 41A/Various SC judgment was there to avoid immediate arrest, But Practically it had been witness, none had given any respite for abuse of power of arrest.
When police arrest someone,
technically prim face you can’t say its abuse, as it was non-bailable offence
and Police, as they can’t refuse to register FIR. On the spot also police can arrest
the Husband, if opposite party power full or use influence, so, the abuse of power
of arrest was not curbed nor register of FIR with long list of people was
stopped.
The intention of Rajesh Kumar Judgments was to curb automatic register of FIR and abuse the power of arrest, only think they have to record the reason and Justify. Means abuse of power of arrest was continue in spite of 41A/various Sc Judgments. Rajesh kumar Judgment was tried to given a way to filter the complaint via Family well fare committee to get time Husband to get AB, which had been reversed.
Second think getting the
AB does not remove person name from the list of Criminal or provide the Live
and Liberty of a person provided under article 21 , many rights had been
restricted as soon as your name in list of any criminal offence start from free
moment to get Passport, Job and many more.
Hence, SC- 3- Judge failed to curb the Misuse the 498A and protect the constitutional right of article 21 of innocent persons, though they acknowledge the same, but failed to take any corrective action.
The justification given
CRPC41A and AB available as per law, so no need any other remedy. In the same logic,
if any women face so called dowry harassment, she can file case as blackmailing
and extortion also, but why special law 498A? Why the demand of Money/property
by wife family from Husband not termed as Dowry ?
The solution given by SC
Misuse to be dealt with AB is nothing but their failure to take corrective
action. Result the innocent people have to suffer, which SC judges itslef termed earlier as unleash Legal terrorism.
Wonder our SC is for to take only note of Misuse or give corrective action? Even after 5th time , still they have not courage to #Scrap498a .
The justification SC- Judges
given , it’s not their Job to correct in loophole in Law , but in case of
Vishaka case to order internal committee ( already sexual assault law was there)
, 66A scraped for Misuse , 377 modified to stop abuse the law , but when comes
to 498A , their contracted stand surprised me.
So , it’s clear beyond reasonable
dought that in India none is interested to protect Men’s Live and Liberty right
provided by Constitution article 21 by making multiple unfair Law by government
, the laws will be abused by Police, advocates. SC Judges also un willing to
take any corrective action. So, what option as Men in India you have?
Injustice somewhere is threat of Justice every where!!!
#SpeakUpMan before its too
late,as no other bandage solution except #Scrap498A , otherwise future generation is not going to forgive you for your silence, as today Marriage it self is became Crime for Men in India.
5 comments:
Perfect... Getting married is becoming crime for men in India.
Having kid is even bigger problem where wife can literally bind you psychologically by harrassing men and even kids by keeping them apart to prove women dominance.
Now a days forget about men harrasinha women if they do not listen to women like a slave they get 498A.
The abuse of 498A will increase.
A day will come where nobody would like to get married and society and culture will get spoiled.
Looks like no one specially law and law protectors do not care about society and culture. The situation even in developed countries was not as bad as India when those countries took women empowerment steps.
Indian social fabric is disintegrating due to misuse of gender biased law. My wife used to threat me openly about false cases for even very minor issues. I have divorced that girl and now i am scared to get married again to another women because of gender biased laws
well written......
#SpeakUpMan #Scrap498 #crimehasnogender #Purushaayog
@SFFngo @Menwelfare
सुप्रीम कोर्ट जब अपने फैसले खुद बदलने लगे तो समझ लीजिए की हमारे देश में न्यायिक व्यस्था में संवैधानिक समझ का ह्रास है।
ये केवल एक फैसला है जो संविधान में मिले समानता के अधिकार को नकारता है और समाज को सुचारू रूप से चलाने और सुगम जीवनशैली को स्थापित करने के लिए न्यायिक तंत्र की व्यवस्था की मूल परिकल्पना की तिलाजंलि है। अतः इस फैसले को न्याय नहीं कहा जा सकता।
प्रथम तो इस फैसले में सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने दहेज उत्पीड़न के मुकदमों के दुरूपयोग के विषय में अपनी चिंता तो जाहिर की है किंतु न तो उन दुरूपयोगों के मूल कारणों का उल्लेख किया है और न ही दुरुपयोग रोकने की कोई कारगर व्यवस्था बताई। पुलिस ट्रेनिंग तो पहले से ही होती है। विवेचनाधिकारी की ट्रेनिंग की बात करके सुप्रीम कोर्ट प्रशासनिक और न्यायिक भ्रष्टाचार को ही उजागर कर रहा है जो जगज़ाहिर है, इसमें कुछ नया नहीं है।सब जानते हैं किस प्रकार की ट्रेनिंग होगी।
दूसरे सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने इस तरह के फैसले देते वक्त कभी इन जेंडर स्पेसिफिक कानूनों पर ये टिप्पणी नहीं कि ये सभी गैर-संवैधानिक हैं और संविधान का खुला उल्लंघन करते हैं। इन कानूनों से संविधान के अनुच्छेद 14 का उल्लंघन होता है और उसकी प्रासंगिकता खत्म होती है।
तीसरे सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने सिर्फ महिला संगठनों के चश्में से देखकर इस फैसले को दिया है जिसको सिर्फ पति और पति के परिजनों की गिरफ्तारी से सुकून मिलता है। उस गिरफ्तारी की आड़ में कितने गैर-कानूनी धंधे पनप रहे हैं इस तरफ से सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने आंखे मूंद ली हैं। ये फैसला सिर्फ गिरफ्तारी को केंद्रित करके दिया गया है न कि रिश्ते बचाने या बनाने के लिए। मतलब साफ है कि सुप्रीम कोर्ट चाहता है कि वैवाहिक संस्था बचे न बचे धंधा बचा रहना चाहिए। ठीक है फिर सरकार से मांग करनी चाहिए कि इसे भी व्यापार मानते हुए जी इस टी के दायरे में लेकर आये।
किसी भी तरह के आतंकवाद, बीमारी, महामारी या प्राकृतिक आपदा से इतनी मौतें नहीं होती हैं जितनी इस कानूनी आतंकवाद से। इस तथ्य को सुप्रीम कोर्ट न तो सुनना चाहता है और न ही मानना।
वास्तविकता यह है कि सत्ता पक्ष की दादागिरी के आगे सारा समाज, विधायिका और न्यायिक तंत्र अंधा, गूंगा और बहरा बना हुआ है जो पुरुषों पर हो रहे अत्याचारों को न तो देख, सुन और बोल रहा है बल्कि मौन रहकर अपना समर्थन भी दे रहा है।
मेरा घर ऊंचा है इसलिए बाढ़ में नही बहेगा, ऐसा सोचने वाले ये ध्यान रखें कि जिस जमीन पर आपका घर बना है वहां की मिट्टी भी बाढ़ ने पोपली कर दी है। बाढ़ में भले ही आपका घर न बहे लेकिन गिरेगा ज़रूर।
Post a Comment