Vodafone win Case in Supreme Court , But what about 20Crs+ Indian Married Men?
Nearly five years after the Indian taxman issued the first notice to
Vodafone international on September 2007 for failure to withhold tax on
payments made to Hutchison Telecom, Chief Justice of India SH Kapadia
and Justice KS Radhakrishnan pronounced their judgement.
(Click here to read the detailed Supreme Court order)
Vodafone had argued India doesn't have jurisdiction to tax the Hutchison
deal because it was structured as a transaction between two overseas
entities. The tax department had said it has authority because the
underlying asset was Indian.
1. If wife file the Divorce after 3-years separation, husband can't oppose on ground Financials Hardship.
2. Without proving any Fault of Husband wife can Claim Share in Husbands ( before or after marriage hard earned) Immovable+movable assets +Compensations , even court have to consider the Husbands Inherited & inheritable assets Value to order such compensations.
3. Husband is going to loose the Child as well as run behind the court next 10 to 20 years for 498A, DV act, CRPC125 etc.
4. Let wife had 100Crs Movable+movable assets ( some may you gifted her) along with her inherited or inheritable property in lacks , but husband will not have Rs.1 claim on that.
RS approves Husband Killer Property Garbing LAW in name of Easy Divorce to Women.
D. Proposed Amendment: 13F and 28D:( Special provisions relating to disposal of property in proceedings under 13C)
Without prejudice to any customs or usage or any other law for the time being in force, the court may, at the time of passing of the degree under section 13C on a petition made by the wife, order that the husband shall give for her and children as defined in section 13E, such compensation which shall include a share in his share of the immovable property ( other than inherited or inheritable immovable property) and such amount by way of share in movable property, if any, towards the settlement of her claim, as the court may deem just and equitable, and while determining such compensation the court shall take into account the value of inherited or inheritable property of husband.
But this 13C along with 13F take away that power form Indian husbands, let the fault lie in your wife, but it is you have to pay.
They got married under one LAW and suddenly one day Govt wake up and Say , Hey Men this is your New LAW of Hindu MarriageNow you can't even fight in Court like Vodafone done , as SC will be hiding under article 15(3) and their repeated stand will be repeated, not interfere in Parliament LAW making process, let be against any Public interest or Country's Interest.
Let wait and see how this Hindu Marriage amended LAW change the total dimension of marriage system in India.
Hence the sword hanging over the Hindu Married men the way the sword hanging over Vodafone in spite they win the case in SC.
Main objection to the Proposed “Marriage Laws (Amended) Bill,2010,