But unfortunately our Law Makers , Judiciary, Media and Feminist Gang never consider the same as Crime.
Inspector Says : We are duty-bound to register #Rapecase when a women cry #RapeInIndia , let it be #FakeRape case & this is how #crimeagainstwomen data increased to fool whole nation. But who cares ? https://t.co/zpBpK6SSO8
— SwarupSarkar (@swarup1972) December 20, 2019
Be #Misandry FREE @AmitShah @rsprasad @PMOIndia @UN
A Fake Story - JustMean presented by SIFAR Fight back team of Delhi.
A normal argument on road between a wannabe girl JustMean & boy SabkiJeet framed up as molestation/eve teasing charges leading to arrest of boy.
News anchor PornAb Go-Sue-Me aka god of sensationalize, en-caches the story to gain TRP for his channel.
Poor boy termed as "PERVERT" and called names by entire nation without even hearing his part of story.
The unanswered question : Why Government make such unfair law , where a men can be jailed on mere verbal allegations in the name of Investigations by Police ? Investigate the case without arrest and if he founds guilty , hang him, but why destroy some one's life on mere allegations ? This is nothing but Legal Terrorism . Where is Constitutions article 21, which gives all Live and liberty ?
A trivial disputes on road or office or in home, women/girls terming men as molester or rapist , that's the reality of today . Today terming a man or boy a rapist or molester much easier than ordering a PIZZA.
Next victim of such unfair laws can be your brother , son, husband, age old father or age old grand father too.
A Virus now arrived in India also, called "Terming Father a Rapist" by Daughter via False , fabricated rape cases .
A Virus now arrived in India also, called "Terming Father a Rapist" by Daughter via False, fabricated rape cases.https://t.co/bypICfnGKv— SwarupSarkar (@swarup1972) August 28, 2019
Proud Moment 4 all Fathers who done #BetiBachaoBetiPadhao from their heart, but in return what they get, Fake Rape case Tks 2 @MinistryWCD 👇 https://t.co/5SGRC4ScMa
Recently it was fund by court that a girl trapped her own father and mother also in fake rape and abortion cases as they not allowed her to meet with her boyfriend regularly. Their parents were put in Jail for months together.
 |
Indian Daughter filed false rape case on Father |
This is not the first case or will be last cases. The number of fake rapes cases on their own fathers is increasing rapidly in India.
 |
Wife file false rape case on father via Daughter |
Don’t forget the filling of rape, molestation, attempted to rape against Father-in-law had now become a norm in every divorce cases after SC Arnesh kumar Judgements which restrict auto arrest in 498A cases. Every advocate has modified their template of accusation, as women you have to just name the Father-in-law and by default he will be termed as molester or rapist.
Today filling a fake rape case had became as easy as ordering some PIZZA or KFC burgers. The Pizza or burgers shop have right to refuse to take your order, but our police have no right to refuse to register the FIR, even if they know the case is false and fabricated .The law had made in such a way and badly drafted, even she can claimed she had been raped 20 mins or 20 years before, there is no difference made.
There is no option but one have to keep paying price as a Girl’s father or as a Father-in-law in India, as when such unfair, biased, mindless law was made, you also refused to come out from Misandric ideology virus injected by radical feminist and media houses, except you every man is a protentional rapist in this country.
A Father spend 3- years in Jail due to #FakeRape case filed by his own Daughter 🙏https://t.co/Qtve4V9cx4— SwarupSarkar (@swarup1972) December 18, 2019
In a country when Girls are not thinking twice to even term her own father #Rapist Delhi CM want Boys to take oath #RespectWomen, but Girls are FREE to do as they wish? @UN pic.twitter.com/bxSrW3TEUv
Terming Father #Rapist by Daughter is increasing in India 👇https://t.co/sTbwvS5Tkd
— SwarupSarkar (@swarup1972) January 5, 2020
Delhi Court found the allegation against Father was not true, but the Man already end his life #RipBrother 🙏
Never ever born in such misandric country where Law makers @MinistryWCD are sick !
Where a Girl does not think twice even to term own Father & brother #Rapist : Why @unwomenindia @NCWIndia along with #LawMakers @HMOIndia @MinistryWCD should not be held responsible to make such #UnfairLaw where any Man can be termed #Rapist & jailed ? Be #Misandry Free @RSSorg pic.twitter.com/TWgZnlzVIK
— SwarupSarkar (@swarup1972) September 2, 2021
On July 29, 2009 he was picked up by the police and charged of raping a 28-year old woman sleeping at the railway bridge of Ghatkopar station. Gopal pleaded not guilty, but all his pleas fell on deaf years. The police presented his case in Sewree court and within a span of ten months of the case hearing, he was awarded seven years imprisonment.
Soon after his conviction, Gopal appealed in the Bombay High court against the lower court's judgments. On June 10, 2015, the Bombay High Court acquitted him of all charges on the basis of inadequate evidence and several loopholes in the probe.
Even after the grave injustice that was meted out to him, Gopal didn't lose hope. He is on a hunger strike at Azad Maidan, Mumbai waiting to meet Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis so that he can present his case and get the policemen who framed him punished.
Gopal, whose identity in the society is that of a rapist is not ready to live it. He wants to present his case to the CM and fight for justice. He hopes to one day bring his daughters out of the orphanage and give them a better life!
 |
Give me Back my 7 years : Gopal Shetya , Fake Rape Accused |
In a number of cases SC had convicted men by mere verbal allegation only without any medical or DNA or any supportive evidence in cases.
Today it is Gopal Shetye , tomorrow it can be any one of us victim of such Misandric mind set , because such law and order had been passed by our elected representative and higher judiciary and none of them can be held accountable in India.
We know none can return the 7 –years of Gopal Sathey like men in India , whatever loss he had faced had already gone and non-recoverable , but time to immediate attention need of our LAW makers as suggested by various HC and organizations like SIF Network:
Why a common citizen of India have to pay the price of inefficiency of Judiciary to deliver the order on time?
(l) Action in relation to False or Malicious Complaints or Giving of False Evidence:
The present Section 14 of the Sexual Harassment Bill appears to be a provision which is liable to misuse.
The above view itself confirms beyond reasonable dought the committee itself had caught red handed with their own ill intention logic towards the "Misuse" of Law is valid ground applicable to all LAW and the sufficient care should be taken to avoid the "Misuse of LAW".
Why he wants to protect the Rapist women of India?
If women do not do the rape they will not be Punished, but why they afraid to accept the same?
In case of under age child sex cases : They also conveniently given the exemption to women , where we witness so many international judgements when women had been punished for rape of child.
Section 375: Rape
375. A man is said to commit rape if he—
(a) penetrates the vagina or anus or urethra of a person with—
(i) any part of his body including his penis or,
(ii) any object manipulated by him, except where such penetration is carried out for
proper hygienic or medical purposes; or,
(b) manipulates any part of the body of a person so as to cause penetration of the vagina
or anus or urethra of another person; or,
(c) engages in “cunnilingus” or “fellatio”,
under the circumstances falling under any of the following six descriptions:—
Firstly.—Against the person’s will; or,
Secondly.— Without the person’s consent; or,
Thirdly, With the person’s consent, where such consent has been obtained by putting the
person, or any other person in whom the person is interested, in fear of death or of hurt;
or,
Fourthly.— With the person’s consent, when the man induces the person to consent to
the relevant act by impersonating another man to whom the victim would have
otherwise knowingly consented to; or,
Fifthly, With the person’s consent, when at the time of giving such consent, by reason of
unsoundness of mind or intoxication or the administration by the man personally or
through another of any stupefying or unwholesome substance, the person is unable to
understand the nature and consequences of the action to which he/she gives consent; or,
Sixthly, When the person is unable to communicate consent either express or impliedly.
Explanation I.— For the purposes of this section, “penetration” means penetration of the
vagina, anus or urethra to any extent.
Explanation II.—For the purposes of this section, “vagina” shall also include labia
majora.
Explanation III: Consent will not be presumed in the event of an existing marital
relationship between the complainant and the accused.
Explanation IV. - Consent means an unequivocal voluntary agreement when the person
by words, gestures or any form of non-verbal communication, communicates
willingness to participate in the specific act.
Provided that, a person who does not offer actual physical resistance to the act of
penetration is not by reason only of that fact, to be regarded as consenting to the sexual
activity.
Section 376B(1): Rape of an underage person: If a man has sexual intercourse with a
person below sixteen years1 of age with or without that person’s consent, he shall be
rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than ten years, but which may
extend to imprisonment for life.
Provided that the existence of a marital relationship between the accused and the
underage person shall not be a valid defence.
Explanation: For the purposes of this section, sexual intercourse shall mean any of theThe word "Men" should be replaced by the word "Person" as recommended by Law commission . If women do not do rape they will not not be punished , but protection of Rapist women is not all acceptable.
acts specified in Section 375 (a) to (c).
From the above it is clear Justice Verma committee reports not only biased , it had promoted the hidden agenda of some male hater women organizations who wants to protect the "Rapist women " of India.
We have some skewed definition of r@pe. After living for two years or so as live-in-partners and sleeping in the same bed, to accuse the male partner of r@pe if he refused to marry is the height absurdity. And police recording it as r@pe the culmination of stupidity. Such stupid definition no country all over the world have. First need to plug this loop hole first or cry for rape is increasing and increasing .
So, my humble request , law should not be on emotion and crime does not have any sex, caste or religion , so the first priority the law should be gender neutral. If women do not do rape , they will not be punished, but outright say, women do not do rape or sexual assault, is wrong and such mindset in law making process will increase the crime in society.
1) Make Rape Law Gender Neutral as in other countries of the globe
2) Relationship cheating cases should not be allowed to be converted into rape cases which suck the scare resources from genuine rape cases.
3) False complaints of Rape cases, should be punished severely, so that genuine cases like ‘Nirbhaya’, gets justice.
4) Introduce the much required police reforms to increase conviction rates of rape cases
5) Introduce the much required judicial reforms for speedier justice and to increase conviction rates of rape cases.
Indian Woman : Murder any man and demand immunity under IPC 100 saying he was trying to rape me. don't forgot to Thank#justiceverma
#ASKMWT : Those crying #ViolentCrime #Rape #SexualAssault #Murder in India is increasing, We ask why it will not increase ? @AmitShah - Japan a country which witness lowest over all crime rate as well #RapeCase but we followed Law of USA/Europe where its highest! @MenWelfare pic.twitter.com/FAusB3Z6xk
— SwarupSarkar (@swarup1972) December 18, 2019
