Friday, 20 December 2024

Atul Subhash suicide case | Are dowry laws in India being misused against Men?



The suicide of Bengaluru techie #AtulSubhash has sparked a storm regarding dowry laws in India. The wife of deceased techie Atul Subhash and her kin were arrested by the Bengaluru Police, said reports.

The arrest of Nikita, her brother Anurag and mother Nisha, comes as the trio filed an anticipatory bail plea in Allahabad High Court, which is scheduled to be heard on Tuesday or Wednesday.

In light of this development, THE WEEK senior special correspondent Puja Awasthi speaks to Swarup Sarkar, founder of Men Welfare Trust on the state of dowry laws in India and how they are being implemented.


Ground Reality: Real face of India. Any think wrong happened to any Girl/women its Men/Boys first come on street with demand hang the Men/Boy. But when #AtulSubhash case #JusticeisDue, watch how girls run away even to talk. Boys & Men, think twice next time .


Thursday, 19 December 2024

Convert Your Fight to Our Fight: A Collective Guide to stop #LegalGenocide of Indian Men.



Navigating legal challenges and societal bias can be daunting, especially for husbands and their families who face unfair treatment. Here’s a guide to transform your personal struggle into a collective movement for fairness and awareness:

Steps to Empowerment

  1. Recognize and Prepare:
    • Acknowledge the potential biases in the law and judiciary against husbands and their families. Before marriage, conduct due diligence, including understanding the family history of your prospective partner.
  2. Build a Support Network:
    • In the event of legal threats or cases, visit courts and police stations to familiarize yourself with the process. Connect with others facing similar challenges to exchange insights and offer mutual support.
  3. Understand the System:
    • Learn how police stations and judiciary systems operate. Analyze success and failure stories to devise strategies tailored to your case.
  4. Separate Case Dynamics:
    • Clearly distinguish between your case and other family members’ cases. Approach each issue individually for better focus and resolution.
  5. Educate Yourself:
    • Read Supreme Court (SC) and High Court (HC) judgments on similar cases. Understanding precedents can provide valuable insights into legal strategies.
  6. Foster Local Support Groups:
    • Organize weekly meetings in your area to review cases, share experiences, and strategize collectively.
  7. Engage in Welfare Activities:
    • Contribute to your community by supporting underprivileged men and children. Acts of kindness amplify your cause and provide personal fulfillment.
  8. Stand Against Extortion:
    • Refuse to succumb to monetary extortion under legal duress. Uphold your integrity by insisting on fair judicial proceedings.
  9. Advocate for Change:
    • Regularly write to your local MPs and MLAs about the challenges faced by men in such situations. Advocate for systemic reform and refer them to reliable sources for understanding the issue.
  10. Live Life Fully:
    • Prioritize your happiness. Focus on activities and passions that bring joy, as life is too short to dwell on negativity. Wealth is best spent enriching your experiences and well-being.
    • Learn to live a life without such wife.



Join the Movement:

Empowering men and families requires collective action. Together, we can create a more balanced and just society. Let’s transform personal battles into a united movement for positive change.

#MensRights #JudicialReform #FamilyWelfare #LegalAwareness


Monday, 16 December 2024

MiLord Can’t there be a Section 294A for #Mentoo?

 Based on a true story from a young Man working in Indian Court ! 

A divorce case was ongoing. Today, it was finally resolved. Standing in court, the man asked the judge:

"Sir, can’t there be a ‘Section 294’ for men too?"

The judge stared at him, speechless. The man broke down in tears and continued:
"Forgive me, Sir. Everyone knows about Section 498A these days. Men like us don’t need anything that grand. Even half of it—like a ‘Section 294’—could save many innocent men in this world. Laws, I guess, are not made for men."

Was the man's statement satire or sheer despair? Holding his mother’s hand tightly, the 32-year-old man, Suman Majumdar, walked out of the court premises after the case was settled. I stood there watching them leave, my vision blurred, my heart resonating with a strange, sharp ache. I couldn't tell if it was sorrow or something else.

I've been a court clerk for three years now. During this time, I’ve witnessed numerous divorce cases unfold before me. But nothing ever left a scar on my heart like this case. I don't know this man personally, yet I felt a deep, inexplicable pain for him.

These days, the courts are filled with stories of broken relationships. Had I not been working here, I wouldn’t have known how harsh life could be.

One of the judges I work under is someone I deeply respect. He’s kind and speaks beautifully. One day, I went to his house for some urgent work. While chatting, he said:
"Rakesh, it’s time for you to get married. How long will you live alone like this?"

I jokingly replied:
"Sir, I’m doing fine. I have my job, I cook for myself, and I eat what I like. I’m happy being alone. Besides, seeing so many broken marriages in court has made me lose all interest in marriage. Living alone has its own charm—you’re your own boss."

Hearing this, the judge burst out laughing and said, "It’s your life, Rakesh, and you have every right to live it your way."

I added, "But Sir, no matter how much we say we’ll live life on our own terms, can we really? At home, my mother is pressuring me to get married. Let’s see what life has in store. But yes, eventually, we all have to settle down."

Life can put anyone in unexpected situations. Could that young man, Suman, have imagined ten months ago that his marriage of only ten months would end in such a manner?

Suman is neither my friend nor a relative, yet I feel compelled to tell his story. He isn’t a government employee but a successful businessman. After his father’s sudden passing, he took over the family business and managed it well. His family wasn’t struggling; they owned a house in Malda town.

However, just days after his wedding, Suman’s mother was diagnosed with cancer. His household consisted of his ailing mother and his wife, Nandini. All Suman wanted was a peaceful life. But peace was exactly what Nandini couldn’t offer.

Suman and Nandini’s marriage had been arranged. Before the wedding, Suman believed Nandini was the perfect match for him—a simple girl from a lower-middle-class family who would understand him. But Nandini only understood the value of money.

After Suman’s mother’s cancer diagnosis, Nandini declared she couldn’t live with a cancer patient and demanded that Suman buy her a separate flat. Suman replied,
"How is that possible? My mother is unwell. I can’t leave her in this condition."

To this, Nandini said,
"Then give me 25 lakh rupees. I’ll stay at my parents’ house."

Shocked, Suman said,
"How can you even say something like this? I can’t give you that."

From then on, the quarrels began. Nandini demanded ₹20,000 a month for her personal expenses, threatening to leave if her demand wasn’t met. Reluctantly, Suman agreed and gave her ₹20,000 for the first two months. But Nandini wasn’t satisfied. She soon demanded another ₹10,000.

"I can’t," Suman replied firmly.

"Then why did you marry me? I didn’t marry you for nothing," Nandini retorted.

The arguments escalated, and Nandini filed a case against Suman and his mother, alleging domestic violence and demanding ₹50 lakh. Ultimately, the case was settled for ₹24 lakh.

When Suman stood in court, he said:
"Sir, the money I am paying today is from my business. ₹15 lakh is from my business earnings, ₹4 lakh from my mother’s savings, and ₹5 lakh borrowed from others. If I sell my house in Malda, I could raise another ₹40 lakh. I’m willing to give her ₹64 lakh, but I refuse to live with a woman like her. Please grant me my freedom, Sir. I want to spend the rest of my life on my own terms."

What level of suffering compels a person to speak this way? I wondered how Nandini could stoop so low. I didn’t hear her side of the story, but I knew Suman was telling the truth.

Suman’s plight reminded me of my own past. Years ago, when I was a university student, I was in a relationship with a girl for five years. That girl was Nandini. Back then, I did everything I could for her—fulfilling all her wishes within my modest means. But in the end, she left me, saying,
"What’s your worth? How much money do you earn?"

Today, I finally understood Nandini’s true nature. She hasn’t changed one bit.

As I watched Suman leave, I thought about how many innocent men get trapped in false cases, losing their wealth and peace of mind.

For men, there’s no ‘Section 498A.’ There’s no court to understand their pain. Liberation, for them, comes only after losing everything—money, property, and dignity. Divorce isn’t always sorrow; sometimes, it’s the ultimate freedom.



Friday, 13 December 2024

How to stop Legal Genocide of Indian Men?



#Unfairlaw or Policy can not bring Fairness in any Society, it only kills fairness in Justice System and harmony in Society.

 

The topic of the legal challenges faced by men in India, particularly in the context of gender-based laws, is a complex and sensitive issue. Some individuals have raised concerns about what they describe as the "legal genocide" of men, particularly in relation to laws that they feel disproportionately affect men, such as those regarding dowry harassment (Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code), false rape allegations, and child custody disputes. 

However, it's important to address this matter from a balanced perspective, considering both the protection of men's rights and the need for gender equity.

Here are a few ways the issue might be discussed and addressed:

1. Reform of Gender Bias in Laws

  • Review of Section 498A (Dowry Harassment Law): Supreme Court of India argued multiple times that this law, while aimed at protecting women from dowry-related harassment, is often misused, leading to unjust consequences for men. Reforms that ensure better scrutiny of cases, as well as proper checks and balances, could be explored.
  • Balanced Laws in Family Courts: Custody battles and divorce cases often have gender biases, with women sometimes given preference in child custody, regardless of the father's situation. Family courts should aim for fairness and evaluate each case independently, based on the best interests of the child, without gender bias.

2. Education and Awareness

  • Raising Awareness of Men’s Rights: There is a need for campaigns and educational programs that raise awareness about men's rights, particularly in relation to family law, domestic violence, and false accusations. This could help remove stereotypes and ensure that both genders are treated fairly.
  • Gender-Sensitive Approaches: Promoting gender equality doesn't just mean focusing on women's issues but also addressing the challenges faced by men. Gender sensitivity training for police, legal professionals, and others can help them approach cases with impartiality.

3. Support Systems for Men

  • Establishing Support Networks: There are relatively few support systems for men in distress in India, especially when dealing with family-related issues, false accusations, or mental health. Creating more avenues for emotional, legal, and psychological support for men could provide a way to address these issues effectively.
  • Men's Helplines and Advocacy Groups: Advocacy groups that focus on men’s rights can play an important role in offering legal assistance, psychological counseling, and support in situations where men may be unfairly treated.

4. Preventing False Allegations

  • Stronger Legal Framework Against False Accusations: While laws like 498A and those related to sexual assault have been created to protect women, there are concerns about their misuse. Providing legal safeguards against false accusations and ensuring strict penalties for malicious intent could help balance the scales.
  • Objective Investigations: Law enforcement agencies and courts should prioritize objective and fair investigations to prevent wrongful convictions and ensure that the rights of the accused, whether male or female, are protected.

5. Public Discourse and Dialogue

  • Open and Constructive Conversations: Societal attitudes towards gender roles and gender-based violence can be difficult to change. Promoting open discussions about the challenges men face, while also addressing women’s issues, is crucial. This could lead to better understanding and a more equitable legal system.
  • Media Representation: The media has the power to influence public perception. Encouraging responsible and fair representation of both genders in issues of law and family dynamics can help promote gender equality.

6. Comprehensive Legal Reform

  • Revision of Laws for Gender Neutrality: A reformation of laws to ensure they are gender-neutral could be a long-term solution. This would involve crafting policies and laws that don't disproportionately benefit one gender over the other but instead focus on the merit of the case at hand.
  • Establishment of Gender-Equal Standards in Law: A thorough analysis of the impact of existing laws on both men and women, coupled with a focus on fair justice, can help avoid potential biases in legal processes.

7. Mental Health Support and Wellbeing

  • Promoting Mental Health Care: Men’s mental health often goes underreported, especially in the context of legal struggles. Addressing emotional and psychological issues in a healthy and supportive way can prevent negative outcomes, such as suicide rates among men.
  • Societal Support: A shift in societal expectations, which often encourage men to remain silent about their struggles, can play a significant role in alleviating these issues.


In summary, while laws are necessary to protect individuals from abuse, ensuring that these laws are applied fairly to both men and women is essential. Gender biases should be minimized, and legal systems should focus on justice and the specific details of each case.

Discussions around men's Constitutional right Article 21- Live and Liberty with Dignity should emphasize a balanced approach that upholds justice for all genders.




Sunday, 27 August 2023

#RedAlert: Amit Shah Implements DESHI Laws with stringent Punishment to Men & Boys Only


Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) & Bharatiya Sakshya (BS) Bill, seek to replace present IPC, CrPC & Evidence Act, respectively. Must watch the discussion at #JmNews to understand #RedAlert for Men & how every Men/Boys life will be miserable.

Wednesday, 23 August 2023

#RedAlert: New Law Coming #Sextrotions by Women to be Legal in India


#RedAlert: New Law Coming #Sextrotions by Women to be Legal in India. Law makers had taken silence of Indian Men Granted. Instead of taking corrective action against #Falsecase #AmitSaha creating new #SexLaw to promote #Sextrotion, how many of you know that? Sex on promise of marriage, provide Job/Promotion, marry hiding identity not a Gender specific Issue, both Men & women in power does same. Then why punish only Men?


Saturday, 8 July 2023

बेटी पढ़ाओ पत्नी नहीं - क्यों ? | Live with Swaroop Sarkar at 9 P.M


Husbands Like Mr. Pintu's confidence been cracked, they are under fear.
Law makers, Judiciary, women activist, Main stream Media houses instead of seeking fairness in Law & eco system, they are desperate to justify the wrong doing, adultery by wives are their birth right.


Wednesday, 28 June 2023

PMO does #UniformCivilCode will be Uniform for Husband and Wife?


Prime Minister of India Mr. Narendra Modi says, how a Home & Country will work when different Law for different Member of Family, but will he take any action to make #CRPC125 #DVACT #IPC498A #IPC304B #Adultery law uniform for Husband & Wife, who stay in same Home?
Be #Misandry Free & Stop #InJustice2Men Too.

Thursday, 12 January 2023

#InJustice2Men: Write to CJI, PMO, Law Minister, Home Minister, PMO, President of India!

You may Love it or hate it, a Law if to be amended or created to Stop #InJustice2Men , it has to be done by Law makers or Supreme Court of India.

There is no other option, but Men have to keep writing to authority for the problem they are facing as well suggestion to amend the Law.

You can write to them via Email, take print and send via Speed Post.

Further you can follow up via RTI too.

PS: Avoid to us any unparliamentary words, keep to the point short and crisp of your problem , your pray or what solution you are looking for, be specific. 


Write to Chief Justice of India :

To:

Hon’ble Chief Justice of India,

Supreme Court of India,

New Delhi-10001 , India.

Email: supremecourt@nic.in


Write to Law Minister of India:

To:

Hon’ble Union Minister of Law & Justice

Room No: 402-A

4th Floor, 'A' Wing, Shastri Bhawan

New Delhi, India.

Email: mljoffice@gov.in

Ph.NO: 01123386974

Fax. No: 01123384241

 

Write to President of India: 

To:

Hon’ble President of India

Rashtrapati Bhavan

New Delhi - 110004

Email Id: presidentofindia@rb.nic.in

Write to Vice-President of India:

To 

Hon’ble Vice-President of India

6, Maulana Azad Road,

New Delhi - 110 011
Telephone - 011-23018684
23016344, 23016422

E-Mail Id: ddo-vps@nic.in  

Write to Home Ministry: 

To:

Hon’ble Home Minister,

Ministry of Home Affairs, North Block .

New Delhi - 110001, India.

Telephone No: 23092392 

Email: jscpg-mha@nic.in : contact@amitshah.co.in

 

Write to Prime Minister of India: (Link)

To:

Hon’ble Prime Minister of India

Prime Minister's Office

South Block, Raisina Hill

New Delhi-110011, India.

Phone No: +91-11-23012312
Fax: +91-11-23019545, 23016857

Email: pmosb@pmo.nic.in: connect@mygov.nic.in


 









Saturday, 26 November 2022

How Long Men Will Be Bonded Labor In India ? #StopAbuseMen


जोर से बोलो: शौक नहीं मजबूरी है #पुरुषआयोग, जरूरी है ! • Men were Bonded Labor! • Men are Bonded Labor! • Men will be Bonded Labor? #StopAbuseMen ! #MenToo are Human !

Sunday, 20 November 2022

Law Minister #KirenRijiju On #Judiciary said what many Citizen of India Want to Say.

#SpeakUpMen with Anil Singhvi on #InternationalMensday: Wish of A Man

Saturday, 1 October 2022

CJI Must review SC Regressive Verdict on #MTPAct Linking with #MaritalRape : A Open Letter

To : 
The Chief Justice of India, 
Supreme Court , New Delhi 
India 

 Respected Sir, 

Being a responsible , law and constitution of India, abiding citizen, forced me to write this letter for your kind consideration to review the order passed by #MiLord Chandrachud, As Bopanna and JB Pardiwala. 

It was a perfect case where SC had opportunity to balance between Pro-Choice & Pro-Life by ordering or framing guidelines regarding unwanted unborn child or born child , how to take care via Women and Child Ministry Funded NGO. 

But it's pain to see that Pro-Life take back seat and pro-Choice take front seat and allow to kill a unborn child up to 24 weeks. Would like to attach the unborn Child reference Photo of 20 weeks and 24 weeks for your ready reference.


To bring your kind notice, Law makers already increased the law full right to abortion in #MTPAct from 12weeks to 20 weeks to 24 weeks for special cases, for which no one even objected. They are not just a fotues, its a life already formed. 

That's the reason maximum country are going towards Pro-Life than Pro-Choice. It's against humanity to allow kill a unborn child , rather than protecting a help less life.

Why this Judgement should be termed regressive and to be reviewed : 

1. Up to 20 weeks a women have pro-choice to decide the unborn child , does 20 weeks not sufficient for a women to decide ? If not where is end? Even just before deliver the baby or after deliver of baby also a women can claim to kill the child as per Pro-Choice and inability to take care the child, will SC allow the same too? 

2. To kill a unborn child the bench seek government support to such women to ensure safe killing of unborn child , but failed to consider same Government support should had been asked for saving the unborn child life. This not unfair ?

3. In the present case and pray by a unmarried women , there was no marriage involved, there was no forced or rape involved , still #MiLords entered in married relationship, was not uncalled for? Even on various case we asked to stick with the case at hand, where as #MiLords take a decision out of case without giving any opportunity of hearing from Husband side . Is that not Unfair? 

4. When the Rape Law is clearing mentioned any sexual relationship between Husband and wife , neither party can term other partner a Rapist, still on what basis #MiLords consider #MaritalRape should be a ground in #MTPAct ? It not entering and disrespect the Law making Process and Law makers wisdom? Is that allowed?

5. Regarding #MaritalRape Law already Delhi High Court given Spilt verdict and presently the same pending at SC. We had been reminded on multiple occasion by honorable court not to comment on sub judice case, but here #MiLords themselves giving judgment on a sub judice matters in a case which are not even related to any forced sex or rape case.  Why it should not considered an attempted to influence the on going cases in other court ?




6. After this #MTPAct order, every abortion can be termed as rape or  forced sex as in the order itself mentioned there is no requirement of any prove the claim is true or false. Is that called natural Justice? 

7. Most dangerous Part of the order: A Women (including wives) no need to prove there was any forced sex or rape . Her own word to be considered as gospel truth & she allowed to kill Unborn Child as per her wish & whims. Was #MTPAct was made for that purpose? Is that not Unfair?

With my limited submission, humble request to consider review the present order and correct the order accordingly keeping in mind the pro-life and respect the Indian existing Law .

My Pray : 


1. #MTPAct should be respected for 20weeks as per law makers wisdom and in case of special case pro-Life to considered and necessary guidelines and responsibility to Govt funded NGO to be given.

2. #MaritalRape should be removed from the Judgment as the same was never prayed in this petition and neither any submission considered why law makers don't allowed to term any sex between Husband and Wife not to be termed Rape. They have provided alternative remedy for the same to be used.

3. If Judiciary enters in law making process, does not respect law makers wisdom, then when Law makers will enters in the judiciary , it will not to be good for any citizen of India.


CC : Law and Justice Minister 
CC : Home Minister of India.

SC verdict on Abortion | #MaritalRape : Unmarried Women seek abortion of Child, no rape, no marriage, no force sex but why SC make order on #MaritalRape?
Now to give Birth a Child women may get 1-2L, but for killing unborn child may get 10 to 15L.