Saturday, 1 October 2022

CJI Must review SC Regressive Verdict on #MTPAct Linking with #MaritalRape : A Open Letter

To : 
The Chief Justice of India, 
Supreme Court , New Delhi 
India 

 Respected Sir, 

Being a responsible , law and constitution of India, abiding citizen, forced me to write this letter for your kind consideration to review the order passed by #MiLord Chandrachud, As Bopanna and JB Pardiwala. 

It was a perfect case where SC had opportunity to balance between Pro-Choice & Pro-Life by ordering or framing guidelines regarding unwanted unborn child or born child , how to take care via Women and Child Ministry Funded NGO. 

But it's pain to see that Pro-Life take back seat and pro-Choice take front seat and allow to kill a unborn child up to 24 weeks. Would like to attach the unborn Child reference Photo of 20 weeks and 24 weeks for your ready reference.


To bring your kind notice, Law makers already increased the law full right to abortion in #MTPAct from 12weeks to 20 weeks to 24 weeks for special cases, for which no one even objected. They are not just a fotues, its a life already formed. 

That's the reason maximum country are going towards Pro-Life than Pro-Choice. It's against humanity to allow kill a unborn child , rather than protecting a help less life.

Why this Judgement should be termed regressive and to be reviewed : 

1. Up to 20 weeks a women have pro-choice to decide the unborn child , does 20 weeks not sufficient for a women to decide ? If not where is end? Even just before deliver the baby or after deliver of baby also a women can claim to kill the child as per Pro-Choice and inability to take care the child, will SC allow the same too? 

2. To kill a unborn child the bench seek government support to such women to ensure safe killing of unborn child , but failed to consider same Government support should had been asked for saving the unborn child life. This not unfair ?

3. In the present case and pray by a unmarried women , there was no marriage involved, there was no forced or rape involved , still #MiLords entered in married relationship, was not uncalled for? Even on various case we asked to stick with the case at hand, where as #MiLords take a decision out of case without giving any opportunity of hearing from Husband side . Is that not Unfair? 

4. When the Rape Law is clearing mentioned any sexual relationship between Husband and wife , neither party can term other partner a Rapist, still on what basis #MiLords consider #MaritalRape should be a ground in #MTPAct ? It not entering and disrespect the Law making Process and Law makers wisdom? Is that allowed?

5. Regarding #MaritalRape Law already Delhi High Court given Spilt verdict and presently the same pending at SC. We had been reminded on multiple occasion by honorable court not to comment on sub judice case, but here #MiLords themselves giving judgment on a sub judice matters in a case which are not even related to any forced sex or rape case.  Why it should not considered an attempted to influence the on going cases in other court ?




6. After this #MTPAct order, every abortion can be termed as rape or  forced sex as in the order itself mentioned there is no requirement of any prove the claim is true or false. Is that called natural Justice? 

7. Most dangerous Part of the order: A Women (including wives) no need to prove there was any forced sex or rape . Her own word to be considered as gospel truth & she allowed to kill Unborn Child as per her wish & whims. Was #MTPAct was made for that purpose? Is that not Unfair?

With my limited submission, humble request to consider review the present order and correct the order accordingly keeping in mind the pro-life and respect the Indian existing Law .

My Pray : 


1. #MTPAct should be respected for 20weeks as per law makers wisdom and in case of special case pro-Life to considered and necessary guidelines and responsibility to Govt funded NGO to be given.

2. #MaritalRape should be removed from the Judgment as the same was never prayed in this petition and neither any submission considered why law makers don't allowed to term any sex between Husband and Wife not to be termed Rape. They have provided alternative remedy for the same to be used.

3. If Judiciary enters in law making process, does not respect law makers wisdom, then when Law makers will enters in the judiciary , it will not to be good for any citizen of India.


CC : Law and Justice Minister 
CC : Home Minister of India.

SC verdict on Abortion | #MaritalRape : Unmarried Women seek abortion of Child, no rape, no marriage, no force sex but why SC make order on #MaritalRape?
Now to give Birth a Child women may get 1-2L, but for killing unborn child may get 10 to 15L.




  

 

at

No comments:

Post a Comment