Constitution Article 21: Live & Liberty a person with dignity considered to be supreme! But our Law makers for Vote bank politics and fool Indian Men always grossly abused/misused article 15(3) of Constitution , result Men had been deprived from their constitution right provided under Article 21.
Till the time clause like 15(3) in our Constitution exist, how many time Prime Minister of India shout from Top : " Sab ka sath sab ka vikas" , it will never can be achieved !Time to #ScrapArticle15_3 #MenToo are Human !
Mr. Y.P. Singh from Lucknow , well know Men right activist says : 15(3) is wrongly interpreted , misused and implemented.
Unfortunately #MiLord of Supreme Court is also blindly doing wrong in the name of women sensitization and is also not doing their duty.
15(3) is made to do the Provisions for the weaker section to bring them in the main stream of society, not the Law.
There is a big difference between Provision and Law :
Laws are applicable to all and have punishment clause, while provisions for some group and no punishment to others. Like : Providing wheal chair for disabled is a provision for which 15(3) was made.
Constitution makers were not such fools that, one article is overruled by the next one.
If so then, why they use two words law, provision in constitution ?
Why not they use same word in both Articles 14 & 15(3) ?
Japan Follow :— SwarupSarkar (@swarup1972) December 18, 2019
1. The Word Person instead of Men/Women in LAW.
2. Civil Damage cases even in case of Rape also!
3. Low poverty levels and low jobless Person (Men/Women).
4. More Police surveillance for safety of Person ( Not discriminate Men/Women).
5. Reasonable Jail with Work!
No comments:
Post a Comment